Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-11 Thread Jason Tibbitts
> Maxwell G writes: > IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired. Yes, it was in Fedora 33 but orphaned for some time and then retired. The last version packaged was 1.0.4. The final spec doesn't look very complicated but of course it's tough to say how that would apply to

Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-11 Thread Maxwell G
On Sun Sep 10, 2023 at 22:04 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a package that has begun to use the nimble language in its new > version: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693 > https://nim-lang.org/ > > It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and

Re: PDC replacement proposal

2023-09-11 Thread Adam Williamson
mpose check report" emails. WORKAROUND: fedfind has a hideous alternative implementation of this which involves just blindly trying possible decrements and seeing if they exist. e.g. if you ask for the compose previous to Fedora-39- 20230911.n.1, it will try 20230911.n.0, if that doesn&#x

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230911.n.1 changes

2023-09-11 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:16 PM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > = ADDED PACKAGES = [snip] > Package: python-sphinx_reredirects-0.1.2-2.fc40 > Summary: Handles redirects for moved pages in Sphinx documentation projects > RPMs:python3-sphinx_reredirects > Size:21.18 KiB This appears

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230911.n.1 changes

2023-09-11 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230910.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230911.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 86 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 485.92 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

2023-09-11 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 11.09.2023 um 18:14 schrieb Neal Gompa : > > What it did do was make my life harder trying to build up and sustain > the pagure contributor community. > > Thankfully, pagure development *isn't* dead and after the mailman > stack stuff is sorted out, I can go back to working on Pagure 6.0.

Re: Anyone interested in packaging + maintaining the nimble language?

2023-09-11 Thread Michel Lind
Hi Ankur, On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 10:04:18PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a package that has begun to use the nimble language in its new > version: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181693 > https://nim-lang.org/ > > It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is a

Re: F40 Change Proposal:PHP 8.3 (Self Contained)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
The discussion thread to provide feedback on this proposed change can be found here https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-php-8-3-self-contained/89611/1 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

F40 Change Proposal:PHP 8.3 (Self Contained)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php83 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by t

Re: F40 Change Proposal:Passim Peer-to-Peer Metadata (Self Contained)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
The discussion thread for feedback on this change proposal can be found here https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-passim-peer-to-peer-metadata-self-contained/89608/1 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproj

Re: F40 Change Proposal:Switch pam_userdb from BerkeleyDB to GDBM (System Wide)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
The discussion thread is now available for feedback on this proposed change here https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-switch-pam-userdb-from-berkeleydb-to-gdbm-system-wide/89606/1 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@l

F40 Change Proposal:Passim Peer-to-Peer Metadata (Self Contained)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Passim_P2P_Metadata This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if

F40 Change Proposal:Switch pam_userdb from BerkeleyDB to GDBM (System Wide)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PamBerkeleyDBtoGdbm == Summary == pam_userdb was built with support for BerkeleyDB, but this project is no longer maintained as open source, so it is replaced by GDBM. == Owner == * Name: [[User:ipedrosa| Iker Pedrosa]] [[User:fjanus| Filip Janus]] * E

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Dropping sshd.socket file (Self Contained)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
The discussion thread is now available for feedback at https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-drop-sshd-socket-self-contained/89604/1 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: PDC replacement proposal

2023-09-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:08:50PM +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > Sorry for the confusion with work that is already done, > We can drop the critpath thanks Adam! > > > As it goes for EoL and package retirement we for the past few releases we > are saving EOL date in bodhi. > So getting EOL for speci

F40 Change Proposal: Dropping sshd.socket file (Self Contained)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
== Summary == The sshd.socket behavior may cause the remote DoS and require a manual intervention to make the server accepting the ssh connections back. sshd.service doesn't have these downsides == Owner == * Name: [[User:Dbelyavs| Dmitry Belyavskiy]] * Email: dbely...@redhat.com == Detailed De

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

2023-09-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:43:55AM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our > > Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both > > Pag

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

2023-09-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2023-09-11 at 11:43 -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our > > Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both > > Pagure, no

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Drop Delta RPMs (System-Wide)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
The discussion thread is now available a thttps://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-drop-delta-rpms/89601/1 for feedback ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-ann

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

2023-09-11 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:44 AM Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our > > Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both > > Pagure, n

F40 Change Proposal: Drop Delta RPMs (System-Wide)

2023-09-11 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Delta_RPMs == Summary == Stop producing Delta RPMs during the compose process, and disable deltarpm support in the default configuration of DNF / DNF5. == Owner == * Name: [[User:decathorpe| Fabio Valentini]] * Email: decatho...@gmail.com * Tar

Re: PDC replacement proposal

2023-09-11 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 11/09/23 15:08, Tomas Hrcka ha scritto: > Sorry for the confusion with work that is already done, > We can drop the critpath thanks Adam! > > As it goes for EoL and package retirement we for the past few releases we are > saving EOL date in bodhi. > So getting EOL for specific release is not a

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

2023-09-11 Thread Solomon Peachy via devel
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 07:58:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our > Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both > Pagure, not GitLab. It is open source. https://lwn.net/Articles/817426/ https://

perl-CBOR-XS license corrected

2023-09-11 Thread Petr Pisar
I corrected perl-CBOR-XS license from: GPLv3+ and (BSD or GPLv2+) to: GPL-1.0-or-later AND (BSD-2-Clause OR GPL-2.0-or-later) -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

Re: Dropping of sshd.socket unit

2023-09-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 21.08.23 11:07, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > On Do, 17.08.23 08:25, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said: > > > Yes, and if this is not what you want, then disable the > > > ratelimit. That's what I am saying? > > > >

Re: PDC replacement proposal

2023-09-11 Thread Tomas Hrcka
Sorry for the confusion with work that is already done, We can drop the critpath thanks Adam! As it goes for EoL and package retirement we for the past few releases we are saving EOL date in bodhi. So getting EOL for specific release is not a problem once the release is out. For storing the orph

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

2023-09-11 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Sep 11 2023 at 08:00:29 AM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: Not to retread old drama, but doesn't Fedora now rely on a proprietary version of Gitlab? No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. The

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

2023-09-11 Thread Solomon Peachy via devel
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:35:50AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > +1, Fedora MUST NOT rely on proprietary infrastructure. IMHO, it is a > mistake that Red Hat is doing so, and Fedora should not follow that > unfortunate move. Not to retread old drama, but doesn't Fedora now rely on a pro

Re: Potential changes to systemd RPM macros

2023-09-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 08:34:59AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:06:45AM -0400, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:15:42AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > %systemd_postun_with_restart, so adding %systemd_postun_with_relo

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 11 September (today)

2023-09-11 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 11 September at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: IRC: https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro (We