Re: PEP-668, cmake FindPython Python_SITEARCH and rpm_prefix

2023-10-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 5:18 PM Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > Since some time, Fedora's cmake FindPython will return > Python_SITEARCH=/usr/local/lib64/pythonX.Y/site-packages, which results in > possible failure to find python libraries below the system site packages dir > (aka shipped by RPMs

PEP-668, cmake FindPython Python_SITEARCH and rpm_prefix

2023-10-24 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi Since some time, Fedora's cmake FindPython will return Python_SITEARCH=/usr/local/lib64/pythonX.Y/site-packages, which results in possible failure to find python libraries below the system site packages dir (aka shipped by RPMs). A workaround(?) is to call EXECUTE_PROCESS(COMMAND ${Python

Heads-up: updating python-trimesh to 4.0.0 in Rawhide

2023-10-24 Thread Ben Beasley
In one week, 2023-10-31, or slightly later, I plan to update the python-trimesh package in Rawhide to version 4.0.0[1]. No dependent package upper-bounds its version, and a COPR impact check[2] did not reveal any incompatibilities. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-trimesh/pull-req

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-10-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, Oct 24 2023 at 08:06:12 AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: The two tools don't have incompatible ideas of valid metadata, we intentionally don't do strict validation. Well for one example incompatibility, you can review that issue: https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/476 Michael ___

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-10-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 01:03:08PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 22:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > I'm not sure at all that it would be possible to do at compose-time... > > > composes are taking around 3.5-4hours an

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-10-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 7:54 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25 2023 at 09:15:37 PM -0400, Neal Gompa > wrote: > > There was no switching. Both appstream-util and appstreamcli are > > considered conformant. > > > > Ultimately, the only way we can stop relying on appstream-glib is if >

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-10-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Sep 25 2023 at 09:15:37 PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: There was no switching. Both appstream-util and appstreamcli are considered conformant. Ultimately, the only way we can stop relying on appstream-glib is if appstream-builder[1] was reimplemented on top of libappstream-compose. Long a

Fedora 39 compose report: 20231024.n.0 changes

2023-10-24 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-39-20231023.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20231024.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231024.n.0 changes

2023-10-24 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231023.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231024.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 31 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 24.00 MiB Size of dropped packages