Hi all,
I've recently been packaging xgboost for Fedora. It's a C++ project using
cmake, with a python module on the side (all in one source tarball):
https://nathans.fedorapeople.org/xgboost/
The dependent dmlc-core package is here:
https://nathans.fedorapeople.org/dmlc-core/
Everything is
Hot news:
We added new license LicenseRef-Not-Copyrightable that should be used for packages like foo-filesystem that e.g., create
just directories and does not have copyrightable code nor content.
The process of adding the licenses on list is still very slow recently.
I made an error when
Congratulations for the PyTorch package!
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch
I hope someone will announce this great achievement to the Fedora
community too, and update the following page too.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/PyTorch/packagingStatus
Jun
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231206.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231207.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 174
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
chromium-120.0.6099.62-1.el7
netdata-1.44.0-1.el7
Details about builds:
chromium-120.0.6099.62-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-259055935d)
A
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
chromium-120.0.6099.62-2.el8
java-latest-openjdk-21.0.1.0.12-1.rolling.el8
netdata-1.44.0-1.el8
Details about builds:
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-12-07/fesco.2023-12-07-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-12-07/fesco.2023-12-07-17.00.txt
Log:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253501
Bug ID: 2253501
Summary: perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Cookies
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 3:26 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
> I'd advise to create PR - wait week or 2,
> if left without response - create BZ for the specific PR as not
> everyone watches PRs and PR notifications, and wait week or two,
> if left without response - send a direct mail to the package
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-12-07 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
First, let me apologize for the short notice on this. We've been
discussing it at the public ELN meetings over the last month, but I
only just now realized that I forgot to send out one of these general
announcements.
Over the last few months, you've probably seen a number of Fedora ELN
packages
First, let me apologize for the short notice on this. We've been
discussing it at the public ELN meetings over the last month, but I
only just now realized that I forgot to send out one of these general
announcements.
Over the last few months, you've probably seen a number of Fedora ELN
packages
Am 02.12.23 um 09:46 schrieb Michal Schorm:
In my experience through the years, I've found very little proven
packagers that would work in what *I would see* as the right way.
I fully agree with you but I wanted to mention Miro + the Python team. From my
experience in the Python packaging
Because not everyone is active on discourse, I thought it makes sense to
link this here for people from the area in or close to London:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/local-meetup-london-2024/98029
--
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 11:21 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> Asking individual maintainers for trivial changes does not scale. The
> alternative would be not to address FTBFS and other build issues, maybe
> file bugs, and rely on active maintainers instead.
The alternative we want to achieve is:
(1)
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:36 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> IMHO all changes should be opened as merge requests in pagure. This gives
> the regular package maintainers a window of opportunity to review the
> change before it is merged. If there's no response from the package
> maintainer after a
* Kevin Kofler via devel:
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
>> I am sick of this. Really. I am so sick of this way of stomping on each
>> others' feet.
>
> My pet peeve is provenpackagers or comaintainers who add unwanted
> automagic (autorelease, autosetup, autochangelog) to my packages. I do
> not want
mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Add reverse test for perl-Devel-Cover`
that you are following:
``
PR is prepared for the situation when we increase the version of Perl.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/10
--
This wsdd update contains a potential breaking change and systemd
service file errors. I have filed a bug report at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253415.
On 07/12/2023 02:43, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following:
``
Add reverse test for perl-Devel-Cover
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/10
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl` that
you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Add reverse test for perl-Devel-Cover
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/9
--
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253383
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
23 matches
Mail list logo
