On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 08:20:25PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Lennart Poettering writes:
> > That said, I would certainly enjoy more if glibc would natively
> > fallback to /usr/lib/glibc/nsswitch.conf or something like that if
> > /etc/nsswitch.conf does not exist.
>
> glibc has an internal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243747
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-259055935d
chromium-120.0.6099.62-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
nodejs-16.20.2-1.el7
I'd like to get WWW::Mechanize::Chrome into Fedora. I've packaged the
dependencies, and the deps of deps, and build deps of deps... that's 20
new packages total (8 are just build/test deps). I can make a bunch of
new package tickets, but I'd rather have some help with maintaining
these (and have
Lennart Poettering writes:
> That said, I would certainly enjoy more if glibc would natively
> fallback to /usr/lib/glibc/nsswitch.conf or something like that if
> /etc/nsswitch.conf does not exist.
glibc has an internal default for nsswitch.conf if one isn't found.
Putting a custom
Please keep your replies on the public mailing list where the
conversation started.
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:39 PM Rafel Amer Ramon wrote:
> As a first attempt, I didn't use the patches beacuse a lot of them failed.
> Today I have revised and modified some of the patches and I can apply 20
> of
Hi Rafel,
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:35 PM Rafel Amer Ramon wrote:
> I'm trying to rpmbild sagemath 10.1 on Fedora 38, but I gave an error.
> See the attached files sagemath.spec and sagemath.log.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
I see you threw away all of the patches. I think you're going
On Fr, 08.12.23 10:25, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> That being said, there are files like /etc/nsswitch.conf,
> /etc/pam.d/*
So for /etc/nsswitch.conf (and some degree of /etc/pam.d/) a
short-term half-way fix is this I guess:
On Fr, 08.12.23 17:23, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
> * Stephen Gallagher:
>
> > That being said, there are files like /etc/nsswitch.conf, /etc/pam.d/*
> > and /etc/fstab which are both API *and* sometimes see manual updates.
> > These are some of the cases that are going to make
With the approval of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildWithDNF5 it seems like a
good time to move Lorax over to using dnf5 to create the boot.iso. My
current plan is to merge my dnf5 branch do a new build on Monday
(12/11). You can preview this here:
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:38 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;(
>
> Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this?
Yeah, honestly, I'm not sure a Change is the right way to go about
this, it seems like it could just be
I'm definitely in favor. I hit this broken step a while back myself. ;(
Hopefully the current maintainers are on board with this?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 13:18 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Can we retire the mailx package, and then update s-nail with:
> >
> > Provides: mailx = %{version}-%{release}
> >
> > (this would work fine because mailx is at 12.5 and s-nail forked
> > from
> > that and is now at 14.9, so upgrading
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 05:23:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Stephen Gallagher:
>>
>> > That being said, there are files like /etc/nsswitch.conf, /etc/pam.d/*
>> > and /etc/fstab which are both API *and* sometimes see manual updates.
>> > These are some
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:34 PM Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
>
> Today I learned (the hard way) that Fedora's mailx package (aka
> Heirloom mailx) is ancient and buggy. Upstream has been dead for over
> a decade and features documented in its man page don't work. The good
> news is that Fedora (and
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> There is a long-term goal of moving packaged files out of /etc,
I will note that I'm opposed to this goal as a goal per-se.
If you want an empty directory, "mkdir /etc2" should work for you.
I fear this will end like the /tmp fiasco where one /tmp became
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243747
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Today I learned (the hard way) that Fedora's mailx package (aka
Heirloom mailx) is ancient and buggy. Upstream has been dead for over
a decade and features documented in its man page don't work. The good
news is that Fedora (and RHEL and CentOS) already have s-nail, which
was forked from it ages
On Friday, December 8, 2023 11:57:55 AM EST Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 11:49 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Friday, December 8, 2023 11:23:29 AM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >
> > > But yeah, there'll always be a few "special" files. But that's fine,
> > >
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 11:49 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday, December 8, 2023 11:23:29 AM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > But yeah, there'll always be a few "special" files. But that's fine,
> > we have mechanisms to handle those. For the other 99%, we should
> > move them out
On Friday, December 8, 2023 11:23:29 AM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> But yeah, there'll always be a few "special" files. But that's fine,
> we have mechanisms to handle those. For the other 99%, we should
> move them out of /etc.
The problem is that there would need to be a standard
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 05:23:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen Gallagher:
>
> > That being said, there are files like /etc/nsswitch.conf, /etc/pam.d/*
> > and /etc/fstab which are both API *and* sometimes see manual updates.
> > These are some of the cases that are going to make
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:25:34AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:58 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a long-term goal of moving packaged files out of /etc, so that
> > only actual local configuration remains in /etc. This has some
* Stephen Gallagher:
> That being said, there are files like /etc/nsswitch.conf, /etc/pam.d/*
> and /etc/fstab which are both API *and* sometimes see manual updates.
> These are some of the cases that are going to make getting to an empty
> /etc very hard to finish off. There's a lot of
On Friday, December 8, 2023 12:41:59 AM EST Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> Congratulations for the PyTorch package!
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-torch
>
> I hope someone will announce this great achievement to the Fedora
> community too, and update the following page too.
>
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:26 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:58 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a long-term goal of moving packaged files out of /etc, so that
> > only actual local configuration remains in /etc. This has some
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 9:58 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There is a long-term goal of moving packaged files out of /etc, so that
> only actual local configuration remains in /etc. This has some advantages:
>
> - Local configuration, i.e. the result of local administrative
Hi,
There is a long-term goal of moving packaged files out of /etc, so that
only actual local configuration remains in /etc. This has some advantages:
- Local configuration, i.e. the result of local administrative actions,
is nicely split from static configuration that is part of package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253501
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
Re-adding Fedora Devel for awareness.
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 7:35 AM Michal Pospíšil (he / him) <
mposp...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Does this mean that any changes in rawhide after the rebuild will not get
> into CentOS Stream 10? I wanted to add a new subpackage to pcs next week
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Cookies` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.11 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Cookies/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Cookies` that
you are following:
``
6.11 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Cookies/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253501
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 4:05 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> Hello team,
>
> I am looking for a packager to review the package rsms-inter-fonts used as
> default by Blender 3D software.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253619
>
> The spec is straightforward as it uses the fonts
Hello team,
I am looking for a packager to review the package rsms-inter-fonts used
as default by Blender 3D software.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253619
The spec is straightforward as it uses the fonts template.
Thanks in advance
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
On 08-12-2023 07:22, Nathan Scott wrote:
ValueError: Globs did not match any module: xgboost
This sounds like the module is not installed where you think it is. In
other words %{pyproject_files} would be empty because the glob (xgboost)
after %pyproject_save_files doesn't match anything.
36 matches
Mail list logo
