[Bug 2256404] perl-DateTime-Format-Atom-1.4.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256404 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-DateTime-Format-Atom-1.4.0-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74903

[Bug 2256405] New: perl-DateTime-Format-RFC3339-1.4.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256405 Bug ID: 2256405 Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-RFC3339-1.4.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Format-RFC3339 Keywords:

[Bug 2256405] perl-DateTime-Format-RFC3339-1.4.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256405 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2006783 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2006783=edit Update to 1.4.0 (#2256405) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2256405] perl-DateTime-Format-RFC3339-1.4.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256405 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',

[Bug 2256404] perl-DateTime-Format-Atom-1.4.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256404 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2006782 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2006782=edit Update to 1.4.0 (#2256404) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2256404] New: perl-DateTime-Format-Atom-1.4.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256404 Bug ID: 2256404 Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Atom-1.4.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Atom Keywords:

Re: rpmbuild core dumps

Stephen Smoogen writes: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/ 2826>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2826 And thanks for opening a bug. I will watch to see what happens.  I'm genuinely curious. Am I really the only one seeing this? The bug seems

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-735fe09bcb perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.6600-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing perl-Finance-Quote-1.5900-1.el9

Re: rpmbuild core dumps

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 17:24, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Stephen Smoogen writes: > > > I am trying to figure out the logic of this section: > > > > > > ``` > > > > static char * lastUname = NULL; // So lastUname is NULL > > static uid_t lastUid; > > > > if (!thisUname) { > >

Re: Are package-owner mail addresses working?

Sergio Pascual wrote on 2024/01/01 21:36: Hello and happy new year. Are package-owner mail addresses working? I have send mails to several and they return a 550 error message, for example: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table Best, Sergio --

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240101.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231231.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240101.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 8 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 81 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 5.02 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Are package-owner mail addresses working?

Hello and happy new year. Are package-owner mail addresses working? I have send mails to several and they return a 550 error message, for example: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table Best, Sergio -- ___ devel