On 1/5/24 5:18 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 8:05 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>>
>> Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-18
>>
>> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-60e0cc89b7
perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.6600-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8eb8988cb8
exim-4.97.1-1.el7
The following
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c87fdba1fc
perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.6600-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-155a6ac298
putty-0.80-1.el8
1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256784
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256784
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Term-Completion-1.02-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256992
Bug ID: 2256992
Summary: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Authentication-0.24 is
available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-Completion` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.02 bump (rhbz#2256705); Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-Completion/pull-request/1
--
___
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-Completion`
that you are following:
``
1.02 bump (rhbz#2256705); Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-Completion/pull-request/1
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256687
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256687
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
As required by the Package Retirement Process[1], this email announces
that I plan to unretire the rust-libdeflater and rust-libdeflate-sys
packages. Both were retired because they were “no longer needed,” but
they will be in the dependency tree of a new python-cramjam package
needed for the
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > >
On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test
builds here [1],
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test
> > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 40 RC 20240105.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 1:01 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi again,
> with the problem on the rawhide, I managed to build evolution-data-
> server update for F39 with no problem, but the chain-build [1] to
> wait for the f39-build refresh/update to have the new eds. It waited
> for 2 hours,
Hello!
Does anyone know how to contact @lcts, the maintainer of rear?
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256943
I see no activity in dist-git, Koji or Bugzilla for more than a year.
There is currently an urgent bug in rear which must be fixed.
Otherwise, the tool is practically
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:16 AM Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> I'm just wondering why my packages under rawhide suddenly need gettext as a
> dependency ?
>
> should i set an if condition for rawhide ?
>
> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 40
> BuildRequires: gettext
> %endif
This shouldn't be conditional. If you
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 8:05 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-18
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be
I'm just wondering why my packages under rawhide suddenly need gettext as a
dependency ?
should i set an if condition for rawhide ?
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 40
BuildRequires: gettext
%endif
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hello Dominik,
Thank you again.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 10:45 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 28 December 2023 at 10:27, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>
> Done. I put @scitech_sig as the default bugzilla assignee for EPEL.
> Can you change the default assignee for Fedora
Hi again,
with the problem on the rawhide, I managed to build evolution-data-
server update for F39 with no problem, but the chain-build [1] to
wait for the f39-build refresh/update to have the new eds. It waited
for 2 hours, which is quite a lot of time.
For what it's worth:
$ koji
> Dne 05. 01. 24 v 11:10 Milan Crha napsal(a):
>
>
> There certainly were these changes:
>
> https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/0560a3a63dfdd6642724c8fad4db9dc...
>
> https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/6592accb2541aa637844cabef16b7ad...
>
>
> Vít
I don't think zlib-ng is the
Dne 05. 01. 24 v 11:10 Milan Crha napsal(a):
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 10:35 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
Not sure whether it's a regression in zlib-ng or something to be
changed in evolution-data-server though
Neither do I. The eds check uses information from pkg-config output for
On 05-01-2024 01:50, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for a
review in this thread.
It's perfectly fine asking for a review. But that should go into its own
mail to the list or, preferably, to <${package}-maintainers@fp.o>.
Currently,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256485
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Doc Type|---
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 10:35 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> Not sure whether it's a regression in zlib-ng or something to be
> changed in evolution-data-server though
Neither do I. The eds check uses information from pkg-config output for
gio-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libxml-2.0 and libsoup-3.0.
On Wednesday, 27 December 2023 at 23:26, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello!
> I intend to hand over primary maintainership of the following packages
> or orphan them if nobody steps up:
> arpack
> chemtool
> cp2k
> elpa
> inchi
> python-colorspacious
> python-fypp
>
Hello, Alexander.
On Thursday, 28 December 2023 at 10:27, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello Dominik,
>
> For the time being I will take inchi, if nobody else wants it. I
> haven't used EPEL in a very long time, so I'm only interested in the
> Fedora branches.
Done. I put @scitech_sig as the
Or just latest zlib-ng update -- upstream change
https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/6592accb2541aa637844cabef16b7adbb4cec4e1
got to fedora with update to 2.1.5 (Dec 27) and koschei started to fail Dec
28: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/evolution-data-server
Not sure whether it's
zlib-devel-1.2.13-4.fc39.x86_64 vs zlib-ng-compat-devel-2.1.5-1.fc40.x86_64
Just guessing. I might be completely wrong.
Vít
Dne 05. 01. 24 v 9:59 Milan Crha napsal(a):
Hi,
this is new to me. I'm trying to build evolution-data-server in a side
tag for rawhide and the build [1] fails
On čtvrtek 4. ledna 2024 19:20:46 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On středa 3. ledna 2024 8:46:22 CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I plan to enable the
> > BuildWithDNF5 change in Fedora Copr as soon as the new Rawhide compose
> > gets distributed to mirrors.
Hi,
this is new to me. I'm trying to build evolution-data-server in a side
tag for rawhide and the build [1] fails in the CMake phase with error:
-- Performing Test HAVE_GPOWERPROFILEMONITOR
CMake Error: Parse error in command line argument: WITH_GZFILEOP
Should be:
35 matches
Mail list logo
