https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273751
Bug ID: 2273751
Summary: perl-Imager-1.024 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Imager
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 10:41:19PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> If you really don't mind jumping through multiple hoops just because
> you want to use "fedpkg local" instead of "fedpkg mockbuild", then I
> guess I can't stop you.
>
> All I *can* do is tell you that you're not going to like the
Peter Boy wrote:
> Well, a switch from Gnome to KDE would require a lot of changes in
> everyday applications, e.g. Mail. That is not required when you update
> from Gnome 2 to Gnome 3.
Well, in principle, GNOME applications will usually work under Plasma and
the other way round. But in practice
Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote:
> The Cellphone user is very comfortable with Gnome. So much so, that I
> believe that if he was given KDE as the interface, two things would
> happen. a) The user will switch to Gnome, or b) The user will find a way
> to add his favourite applications to the
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> GNOME (Mutter) maximizes windows if they initially take 80% of more
> screen space.
And I believe that that, too, was a refinement added in later releases.
IIRC, GNOME 3.0 just maximized everything.
Kevin Kofler
--
___
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-07e8f5f1f0
libopenmpt-0.7.6-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d9102d9191
clojure-1.8.0-3.el7
1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272408
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-PDL-2.086 is available |perl-PDL-2.087 is
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Pytest_8
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Pytest_8
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if
Hi folks,
We are fast approaching the end of the F40 Final Freeze and the F40
Go/No-Go meetings will start real soon. There are a number of bugs,
both accepted and proposed, filed against F40 Final, so your help in
troubleshooting and potentially finding a fix for those would be
greatly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Test-mysqld-1.0020-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=115938838
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691
Bug ID: 2273691
Summary: perl-Test-mysqld-1.0020 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-mysqld
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273691
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2025459
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2025459=edit
Update to 1.0020 (#2273691)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2024-04-05 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
=
#
Hi devel!
I'm Sean (FAS: seaninspace). I've been working professionally in Linux
Sysadmin/Engineering positions for over a decade now, and would like to
help out more :)
I've spent most of my Fedora time in QA with the installer, specifically
the XFCE Live ISO. Additionally, I have
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 7:35 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:51 AM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> > Is there any other set of packages which we package like that?
>
> Probably golang ... maybe Haskell, OCaml?
Not OCaml, no. The OCaml packages can be installed and used for
OLD: Fedora-40-20240404.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240405.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Am 05.04.24 um 12:20 schrieb Vít Ondruch:
Dne 04. 04. 24 v 17:32 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
Neal Gompa wrote:
By default, GNOME only presents the close window button. The other
buttons are missing, and there isn't really an intuitive way to
discover the other window management actions.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:16 PM Emanuel Lima wrote:
>
> I'm not sure this helps, but I maintain a Rust and Go package that builds
> fine with fedpkg local. If you want to take a look at the spec:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kata-containers/blob/rawhide/f/kata-containers.spec
This is a
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:51 AM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> So you're saying that those packages are in the repos for everyone but
> not meant to be installed by anyone (besides mock chroots), and that is
> how and why they are packaged.
Yes. That is the best we can do given how cargo + Rust
> Am 05.04.2024 um 14:16 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel
> :
>
> Peter Boy wrote:
>>>
>>> . . .
>>
>> This is an absolute no-go! It would break everyone’s usage of Fedora
>> Workstation
>
> It would be a major change, yes. Though not really different from the
> aforementioned upgrade to
I'm not sure this helps, but I maintain a Rust and Go package that builds fine
with fedpkg local. If you want to take a look at the spec:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kata-containers/blob/rawhide/f/kata-containers.spec
--
___
devel mailing list
I am an old geezer with about 60 years of IT experience, from mainframe to
cellphone.I am self-convinced that dropping gnome for KDE as a default would be
BAD.Why?Today, everyone who ones a cellphone, has on his phone a set of icons.
Some are there by default, some are there as extra
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:20:51PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 04. 04. 24 v 17:32 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > By default, GNOME only presents the close window button. The other
> > > buttons are missing, and there isn't really an intuitive way to
> > >
We didnt withdraw it because, well to be completely honest, we are afraid
that, if we do that, in the eyes of the community at least, we will abandon
the idea completely and any subsequent effort would be undermined as a
result.
It’s kindof a case of « damned if you do and damned if you don’t »…
Peter Boy wrote:
> I'm probably not the right person to comment on this, because I completely
> abandoned Fedora Desktop when it was hit (badly) by Gnome 3. That
> destroyed my daily workflow and work routines and made it unusable (for
> me), or at least barely usable for serious professional work
I wrote:
> That is exactly the problem with autotools code, almost nobody understands
> what the heck it does, almost everybody just copies and pastes somebody
> else's snippet hoping it does not do bad things. And gnulib is a
> particularly ugly piece of the puzzle.
PS: Here is a pretty good
I'm probably not the right person to comment on this, because I completely
abandoned Fedora Desktop when it was hit (badly) by Gnome 3. That destroyed my
daily workflow and work routines and made it unusable (for me), or at least
barely usable for serious professional work not related to
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 04:26:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 18:35 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
Dne 04. 04. 24 v 17:32 Kevin Kofler via devel napsal(a):
Neal Gompa wrote:
By default, GNOME only presents the close window button. The other
buttons are missing, and there isn't really an intuitive way to
discover the other window management actions.
I agree that there are no other
Hi Lumir,
Hau idatzi du Lumír Balhar (lbal...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2024
api. 4(a), og. (09:57)):
>
> It might look like simple bump but you are upgrading from 4.1.1 to 6.0.0
> and there are some breaking changes between those releases.
By "simple bump" I meant no other changes in the
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from EUPL 1.2 to EUPL-1.2.
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected packages:
AusweisApp2
rust-tpm2-policy
dbus-parsec
Unless somebody stop me, I will do this change directly in dist-git after a
week.
I have the tooling in place. Very
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 40 RC 20240405.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
Dne 28. 03. 24 v 12:40 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I will do the change only for:
./bitstream-vera-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
./bpg-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera
Fabio Valentini venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-04 22:41:19:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 9:42 PM pfed--- via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:51:31AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > > The short answer is: No, "fedpkg local" is not expected to work for
> > > > > Rust packages, and
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 04:26:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 18:35 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:21:36AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > > So here are
36 matches
Mail list logo
