According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate RC-1.13 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the c
I was noticing a missing file, titled a logfile, (Who did the inspection when,
and was it OK)
Leslie Satenstein
On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 10:05:34 a.m. EDT, David Cantrell
wrote:
On 4/9/24 17:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:55:41PM -0400, David Cantrel
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 12:50 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate RC-1.12 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.o
>[1] https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/395#issuecomment-535875379
> .
>If that was part of zstd or even actively being looked at, then yes.
I mean, per your own comment on that thread, the API *is* available and it's in
zstd, but no frontend supports it yet.
And per the maintainer's co
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 14:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:55:41PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am looking for multiple people to help be upstream stewards of the
> > rpminspect-data-fedora project. This is a project that contains config
> > file
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 02:55:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [08/04/2024 09:02] :
> >
> > Well, you and Kevin see "salami tactics" (whatever that may be),
>
> FTR, I have no idea what "salami tactics" is.
>
> > while I see normal engineering practice: some new
On 10/04/2024 15.52, Timothée Ravier wrote:
Due to a bug in rpm-ostree, the /etc/shadow, /etc/shadow-, /etc/gshadow and
/etc/gshadow- files in Fedora CoreOS, IoT, Atomic Desktops have the
world-readable bit set.
== Affected versions ==
All Fedora CoreOS nodes installed starting from the foll
OLD: Fedora-40-20240409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 8
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Thank you! I have a couple other people who have expressed interest, so I will
send an email to all of you about the next steps (location of the repo, etc,
those sorts of logistics).
Thanks,
On 4/9/24 18:47, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> I would like to contribute. Will be an e
On 4/9/24 17:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:55:41PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am looking for multiple people to help be upstream stewards of the
>> rpminspect-data-fedora project. This is a project that contains config
>> files and rules for running
Due to a bug in rpm-ostree, the /etc/shadow, /etc/shadow-, /etc/gshadow and
/etc/gshadow- files in Fedora CoreOS, IoT, Atomic Desktops have the
world-readable bit set.
== Affected versions ==
All Fedora CoreOS nodes installed starting from the following versions are
impacted:
- stable: 38.2023
According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate RC-1.12 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the c
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:02:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:38:07PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > In particular:
> > > - local builds work, I do them all the time, with 'fedpkg local' or
> > > through an srpm.
> >
> > Using rpmbuild directly need
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.31 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Remi Collet venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-09 10:23:57:
> Le 08/04/2024 à 18:43, Michael J Gruber a écrit :
>
> > How absurd!
>
> That is rude, and ONLY your PoV.
>
>
> To summarize, there is no agreement on a unique
> workflow, and having one to become the only allowed
> seems to me as a terrible
Dne 09. 04. 24 v 19:06 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 12:57:33PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 12:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:41:01AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 04. 24 v 10:43 Zbigniew Jędrzejews
16 matches
Mail list logo
