https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257225
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-43a0920f12 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257224
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-f060b59d26 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-7a1c939a17
editorconfig-0.12.7-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-88820507e6
upx-4.2.3-1.el8
6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257224
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-a8b1cd8e52 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d9102d9191
clojure-1.8.0-3.el7
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-1f6e851537
trafficserver-9.2.4-1.el7
5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257225
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-2843f37353 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate RC-1.13 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
I was noticing a missing file, titled a logfile, (Who did the inspection when,
and was it OK)
Leslie Satenstein
On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 10:05:34 a.m. EDT, David Cantrell
wrote:
On 4/9/24 17:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:55:41PM -0400, David
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 12:50 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate RC-1.12 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello Pythonistas,
>
> Python 3.13 has an experimental JIT compiler:
>
> https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.13.html#experimental-jit-compiler
>
> Enabling it is a configure (hence build-time) option.
>
> How do we handle this in Fedora?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 8:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Pythonistas,
>
> Python 3.13 has an experimental JIT compiler:
>
> https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.13.html#experimental-jit-compiler
>
> Enabling it is a configure (hence build-time) option.
>
> How do we handle this in Fedora?
>
Hello Pythonistas,
Python 3.13 has an experimental JIT compiler:
https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.13.html#experimental-jit-compiler
Enabling it is a configure (hence build-time) option.
How do we handle this in Fedora?
- We can keep it disabled, as it is experimental.
- We can enable
>[1] https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/395#issuecomment-535875379
> .
>If that was part of zstd or even actively being looked at, then yes.
I mean, per your own comment on that thread, the API *is* available and it's in
zstd, but no frontend supports it yet.
And per the maintainer's
As discussed in previous meetings, we are having elections for EPEL
Steering Committee members with the Fedora 40 election sessions.[1] We
will be voting on 4 committee seats this election, but after looking at the
logs, I am only seeing 3 people who have volunteered for re-election.
- Pablo
On 10. 04. 24 17:30, Sandro wrote:
On 10-04-2024 12:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 04. 24 19:30, Sandro wrote:
Therefore, I'm thinking of introducing pynose as a drop in replacement of
deprecated nose. Pynose uses the same namespace as nose, but provides
python3dist(pynose). Thus adding
On 10-04-2024 12:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 09. 04. 24 19:30, Sandro wrote:
Therefore, I'm thinking of introducing pynose as a drop in replacement
of deprecated nose. Pynose uses the same namespace as nose, but
provides python3dist(pynose). Thus adding Provides: for nose would
make it a
On 10-04-2024 11:57, Lumír Balhar wrote:
This sounds like an interesting idea for one more reason. We are
currently working on the update of pytest to version 8 and that version
no longer runs nose setup/teardown functions/methods which, as far as we
know now, is a change that breaks a lot of
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 14:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:55:41PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am looking for multiple people to help be upstream stewards of the
> > rpminspect-data-fedora project. This is a project that contains config
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257224
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-6ebc36e81d (perl-Clipboard-0.29-1.el9) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-6ebc36e81d
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257224
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-f060b59d26 (perl-Clipboard-0.29-1.el8) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-f060b59d26
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257224
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-a8b1cd8e52 (perl-Clipboard-0.29-1.el7) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-a8b1cd8e52
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257225
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-2843f37353 (perl-Clipboard-0.29-1.fc40) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-2843f37353
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257225
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-43a0920f12 (perl-Clipboard-0.29-1.fc39) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-43a0920f12
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273832
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257224
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Clipboard-0.29-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257225
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 02:55:36PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [08/04/2024 09:02] :
> >
> > Well, you and Kevin see "salami tactics" (whatever that may be),
>
> FTR, I have no idea what "salami tactics" is.
>
> > while I see normal engineering practice: some new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257225
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273832
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257224
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On 10/04/2024 15.52, Timothée Ravier wrote:
Due to a bug in rpm-ostree, the /etc/shadow, /etc/shadow-, /etc/gshadow and
/etc/gshadow- files in Fedora CoreOS, IoT, Atomic Desktops have the
world-readable bit set.
== Affected versions ==
All Fedora CoreOS nodes installed starting from the
OLD: Fedora-40-20240409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 8
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Thank you! I have a couple other people who have expressed interest, so I will
send an email to all of you about the next steps (location of the repo, etc,
those sorts of logistics).
Thanks,
On 4/9/24 18:47, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> I would like to contribute. Will be an
On 4/9/24 17:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 01:55:41PM -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am looking for multiple people to help be upstream stewards of the
>> rpminspect-data-fedora project. This is a project that contains config
>> files and rules for running
Due to a bug in rpm-ostree, the /etc/shadow, /etc/shadow-, /etc/gshadow and
/etc/gshadow- files in Fedora CoreOS, IoT, Atomic Desktops have the
world-readable bit set.
== Affected versions ==
All Fedora CoreOS nodes installed starting from the following versions are
impacted:
- stable:
According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate RC-1.12 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:02:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:38:07PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > In particular:
> > > - local builds work, I do them all the time, with 'fedpkg local' or
> > > through an srpm.
> >
> > Using rpmbuild directly
ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
Indeed. perl-Devel-NYTProf is fullarch. @jjames, what's the problem with
flamegraph?
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst/pull-request/1
--
On 09. 04. 24 19:30, Sandro wrote:
Therefore, I'm thinking of introducing pynose as a drop in replacement of
deprecated nose. Pynose uses the same namespace as nose, but provides
python3dist(pynose). Thus adding Provides: for nose would make it a drop-in
replacement for packages currently
Hi.
This sounds like an interesting idea for one more reason. We are
currently working on the update of pytest to version 8 and that version
no longer runs nose setup/teardown functions/methods which, as far as we
know now, is a change that breaks a lot of packages we previously
migrated
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.31 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
flamegraph is noarch too.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel
Remi Collet venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-09 10:23:57:
> Le 08/04/2024 à 18:43, Michael J Gruber a écrit :
>
> > How absurd!
>
> That is rude, and ONLY your PoV.
>
>
> To summarize, there is no agreement on a unique
> workflow, and having one to become the only allowed
> seems to me as a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274032
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Sys-Virt-10.2.0-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274032
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Dne 09. 04. 24 v 19:06 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 12:57:33PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 12:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:41:01AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 04. 24 v 10:43 Zbigniew
ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
perl-Task-Catalyst is noarch. What's the point of ExcludeArch? Preventing from
building it on i686 builders because perl-Devel-NYTProf requires flamegraph
which wont be there? Could you please write
47 matches
Mail list logo
