On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 8:47 PM Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2024, at 9:22 AM, Byoungchan Lee via devel wrote:
> > In well-maintained Fedora packages, the use of the FetchContent module
> > is generally discouraged because dependencies are already available in
> > the Fedora repositories
On Mon, May 27, 2024, at 9:22 AM, Byoungchan Lee via devel wrote:
> In well-maintained Fedora packages, the use of the FetchContent module
> is generally discouraged because dependencies are already available in
> the Fedora repositories.
>
> While it's uncertain if build workers in Fedora have i
In well-maintained Fedora packages, the use of the FetchContent module is
generally discouraged because dependencies are already available in the Fedora
repositories.
While it's uncertain if build workers in Fedora have internet access, to
improve security, I believe it is recommended to entire
On Sun, 2024-05-26 at 21:29 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On 21/05/2024 15:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > tl;dr I screwed up and accidentally made two critical mistakes:
> >
> > 1) Node.js 22 got into Rawhide as the default early. I'm not sure
> > of
> > how to back that out safely.
> > 2
On 21/05/2024 15:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
tl;dr I screwed up and accidentally made two critical mistakes:
1) Node.js 22 got into Rawhide as the default early. I'm not sure of
how to back that out safely.
2) A change made in Node.js 20 to split out two libraries
(cjs-module-lexer and undici)
> On 25-05-2024 16:56, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Two more packages depend on it currently:
>
> $ fedrq wrsrc -Xs noopenh264
> ffmpeg-6.1.1-13.fc41.src
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.24.3-1.fc41.src
> qt6-qtwebengine-6.7.1-1.fc41.src
Ah, right. Qt6-webengine also uses Chromium's Blink and WebRTC.
T
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 8:15 AM Byoungchan Lee via devel
wrote:
>
> While this is okay
> for Google, as they likely have a license agreement with other patent
> holders
>
While I do not think it has ever been officially
confirmed, it has been widely conjectured that
Google just pays the maxi
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2024-05-27
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Greetings testers! It's meeting time again.
Here is a handy
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 9:29 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in the Fedora Rust channel on Matrix, I am planning to do
> a mini-mass-rebuild of all Rust applications (that are co-maintained
> by the Rust SIG), likely by the end of this week. I estimate that it
> will involve
On Sun, May 26 2024 at 08:13:52 AM +00:00:00, Byoungchan Lee via devel
wrote:
From what I understand, even with noopenh264, Chromium and WebRTC's
codebase will still need modification to use Fedora's OpenH264 or
noopenh264 package.
What do you think?
I'm not familiar with Chromium or libwebrt
On Sun, May 26 2024 at 06:09:06 AM +00:00:00, Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
I see you have created noopenh264 just for wrapping openh264, would
it worth to use ffms2 (which wraps more codecs) instead?
The two things we care about are gstreamer1-plugin-openh264 and
mozilla-openh264, neither of
As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-day(a)libera.chat
https://pubfonts.com
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240525.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240526.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 50
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
> On Sat, May 25 2024 at 12:55:05 PM +00:00:00, Byoungchan Lee via devel
> Yes!
Thanks for the confirmation, Michael!
> No. That's an example of what you no longer need to do now that
> noopenh264 is available in Fedora. Previously, dlopen() was required
> since you cannot build depend on the
14 matches
Mail list logo
