F43 Change Proposal: Package specific RPM Macros For Build Flags (system-wide)

Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_specific_RPM_Macros_For_Build_Flags Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-package-specific-rpm-macros-for-build-flags-system-wide/154987 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represe

Re: Observation: 'acpi=off' kernel param breaking BIOS installations

Hi Michal, On 2-Jun-25 15:28, Michal Schorm wrote: > I maintain a fleet of very old 64-bit laptops in various conditions > for events for youth. > I use a set of custom installation and configuration scripts to > install Fedora + Cinnamon DE. > > When debugging an issue on two machines, I discove

Re: dnf "no match for group package" on upgrade...

thanks -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedorapr

F43 Change Proposal: Remove DNF modularity support from Anaconda (system-wide)

Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_DNF_modularity_support_from_Anaconda Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-remove-dnf-modularity-support-from-anaconda-system-wide/154988/2 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document repre

F43 Change Proposal: Golang Packages Vendored By Default (system-wide)

Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GolangPackagesVendoredByDefault Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-golang-packages-vendored-by-default-system-wide/154986 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change

F43 Change Proposal: Erlang 27 (self-contained)

Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Erlang_27 Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-erlang-27-self-contained/154985 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals a

Observation: 'acpi=off' kernel param breaking BIOS installations

I maintain a fleet of very old 64-bit laptops in various conditions for events for youth. I use a set of custom installation and configuration scripts to install Fedora + Cinnamon DE. When debugging an issue on two machines, I discovered that using 'acpi=off' as a kernel parameter breaks every BIO

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250602.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250601.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250602.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 14 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 53 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 173.25 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: F42 Elections Voting is now Open!

Hi folks, We are in our final hours of voting for this election cycle. Voting closes today @ 23:59 UTC so if you have not done so already, you still have time to vote. Kindest regards, Aoife Aoife Moloney Fedora Operations Architect On Tue, May 20, 2025, 9:16 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > The c

Re: speed-dreams-2.4.2: How to determine the cause of a SIGSEGV signal

i think the current backtrace log [1] is also useless. [1] ]https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/gdb2.txt Yes, i used on the koji buidl this Option: '-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release' -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: RPM %doc directive

On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 10:39, Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I'm struggling with RPM's %doc directive... I have a package which > installs a doc file in the buildroot, so I want to mark it as > documentation. > > According to the RPM guide [1], the %doc directive

Re: speed-dreams-2.4.2: How to determine the cause of a SIGSEGV signal

Those options look ok, I note your koji build used '-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release' -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.f

Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250602.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250602.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: speed-dreams-2.4.2: How to determine the cause of a SIGSEGV signal

is this correct or is there something missing to the options: %build %cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=RelWithDebInfo \ -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=OFF\ -DOPTION_DEBUG:STRING=ON \ -DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed" \

Re: Tekton pipeline for Fedora RPM builds in Konflux

Florian Weimer wrote: > * Ralph Bean: > > I think you're interpreting the situation correctly. Upstream, we > > documented a decision to build those artifacts from source in > > https://konflux-ci.dev/architecture/ADR/0046-common-task-runner-image.html, > > discussed > > https://github.com/konflux-

Re: speed-dreams-2.4.2: How to determine the cause of a SIGSEGV signal

Check your build flags to make sure '-g' is included and cmake doesn't strip during build. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://d

Re: Tekton pipeline for Fedora RPM builds in Konflux

* Ralph Bean: > I think you're interpreting the situation correctly. Upstream, we > documented a decision to build those artifacts from source in > https://konflux-ci.dev/architecture/ADR/0046-common-task-runner-image.html, > discussed > https://github.com/konflux-ci/architecture/pull/217. Downstr

speed-dreams-2.4.2: How to determine the cause of a SIGSEGV signal

Hi, I have installed speed-dreams-2.4.2 and noticed that a SIGSEGV, segmentation fault [1]. occurs when exiting the program. Unfortunately, the thread in question (speed-dreams-2) does not display any function names, which is probably due to missing symbols: in the upstream ticket https://for

Re: Tekton pipeline for Fedora RPM builds in Konflux

I think you're interpreting the situation correctly. Upstream, we documented a decision to build those artifacts from source in https://konflux-ci.dev/architecture/ADR/0046-common-task-runner-image.html, discussed https://github.com/konflux-ci/architecture/pull/217. Downstream in RH, we're trac

Re: speed-dreams-2.4.2: How to determine the cause of a SIGSEGV signal

speed-dreams-debuginfo-2.4.2-1.fc42.x86_64 is already installed. Regards Martin -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorap

Re: rpm 4.1 x 4.20 and custom debuginfo packages

* Jiri Vanek: > Florian, I saw you were playing with advanced debuginfo macros in past. Maybe > you may know? > > TY! > J. > > On 5/30/25 17:12, Jiri Vanek wrote: >> Hello! >> We had recently changed how we handle debuginfo in JDK: >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-r

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: Monday, 02 June 2025 (today) at 13:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday, 02 June at 13:00 UTC. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over on Matrix in the Fedora Meeting channel: https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org You can use th

Re: speed-dreams-2.4.2: How to determine the cause of a SIGSEGV signal

On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 10:09:43AM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed speed-dreams-2.4.2 and noticed that a SIGSEGV, segmentation > fault [1]. occurs when exiting the program. > Unfortunately, the thread in question (speed-dreams-2) does not display any > function names, whi

Re: rpm 4.1 x 4.20 and custom debuginfo packages

Florian, I saw you were playing with advanced debuginfo macros in past. Maybe you may know? TY! J. On 5/30/25 17:12, Jiri Vanek wrote: Hello! We had recently changed how we handle debuginfo in JDK: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/147#request_diff

Re: Tekton pipeline for Fedora RPM builds in Konflux

* Pavel Raiskup: > I'm happy to share that we now have a Konflux Pipeline for building Fedora > packages. Ralph wrote a blog post about it today on the containers-sig: > > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/konflux-fedora-update-may-2025/154784 > > The code lives here: > > https://

Fedora 43 Python 3.14 rebuild in a side tag starts today

Hello, We are starting the Python 3.14 mass rebuild in the side tag for Fedora 41 with Python 3.14.0b2. Please, follow the original instructions when planning to build your Python packages. We'll let you know when we'll plan to merge the side tag. And... keep your fingers crossed :) Karolina