* Kevin Kofler via devel:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> But those are hand-written directives, no? That approach doesn't scale at
>> all.
>
> Handwritten unwinding information for handwritten assembly. C code has
> compiler-generated unwinding information.
And if you don't manipulate the stack pointer,
On July 8, 2025 6:16:21 AM GMT+02:00, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>Hello team,
>
>Upstream luxcore made a change to their 2.10 version release requiring a new
>luxcoredeps dependencies via conan build manager. Can someone help to
>effectively build a packaged version?
Just ignore the luxcoredep
tried to ping him in #foss-sthlm on Libera for you
Den tis 8 juli 2025 kl 02:04 skrev David Auer :
>
> Forgot the CC addresses, sorry. The email addresses are both from
> bugzilla, the gmail.com is displayed but when you right click and copy
> it, you get the other one.
>
> --
> __
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250707.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250708.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 37
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hello team,
Upstream luxcore made a change to their 2.10 version release requiring a
new luxcoredeps dependencies via conan build manager. Can someone help
to effectively build a packaged version? Spec file attached for the purpose.
Thanks in advance
Reference:
Contribute to LuxCoreRender/
Arrow packages include libarrow*.rpm parquet*.rpm (libparquet*), and
python-pyarrow*.rpm. Updating to Arrow 20.0.0
side-tag f43-build-side-113972 has been created for rebuilding the
dependent packages:
* ceph (for which I am the maintainer)
* gdal
* groonga
* myst-nb
* python-dask
* python
Forgot the CC addresses, sorry. The email addresses are both from
bugzilla, the gmail.com is displayed but when you right click and copy
it, you get the other one.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Nikita Popov writes:
> I haven't looked into this, but I suspect LLVM will want to disable
> this due to the size of our libraries. llvm-static is a dependency of
> llvm-devel, and it's already close to 400MB when installed. [...]
I see what you mean. I've tried to gather this data about llvm
Neal Gompa wrote:
> But those are hand-written directives, no? That approach doesn't scale at
> all.
Handwritten unwinding information for handwritten assembly. C code has
compiler-generated unwinding information.
Kevin Kofler
--
___
devel ma
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:43 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa writes:
>
> > [...] So my semi-naive interpretation of the problem here is that
> > glibc is special in that it doesn't provide any support for real-time
> > tracing or profiling. [...]
>
> Note that glibc does support unwindi
Neal Gompa writes:
> [...] So my semi-naive interpretation of the problem here is that
> glibc is special in that it doesn't provide any support for real-time
> tracing or profiling. [...]
Note that glibc does support unwinding-based tracing/profiling via the
.cfi directives even in assembly co
Hello,
following to the non-responsive maintainer policy I'm writing to this list to
ask if anyone knows how to contact the maintainer kushal. In addition to the
contact attempts through bugzilla I also wrote an email to a different address
found in a commit on Github (mail@[...].in).
I notice
Gary Buhrmaster writes:
> There were an estimated 400,000 devices
> that have been harvested as worker bots
> in Brazil alone (some of which appear to be
> poorly maintained IoT devices, and some
> others are pirate IPTV boxes) which have
> also been used in various DDOS attacks,
> but the botnet
License tag for gitg has been updated from
GPL-2.0-or-later
to
GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT
Additional licenses were found after code review.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logi
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 11:55 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> wrote:
> > Wiki -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StaticLibraryPreserveDebuginfo
> > Discussion thread -
> >
> https://dis
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StaticLibraryPreserveDebuginfo
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-lets-preserve-debuginfo-in-static-libraries-system-wid
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2025/07/04 4:03:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 43 approximately one week before branching,
i.e. 2025-08-05.
5 weekly reminders are required, this is the first one (delayed a bit
On Fri, 2025-07-04 at 14:10 +0200, Maxwell G wrote:
> It sounds like an infra issue, so
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Hi,
thanks, I opened:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12634
Bye,
Milan
--
__
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250706.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250707.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages
19 matches
Mail list logo
