> FHS, even version 3, has mostly missed the evolution of Linux systems
> that has happened in the last few decades. In particular, it
> completely missed the usr-merge, and obviously the merge of bin and
> sbin… Just looking at the contents table, it is full of outdated
> stuff, it talks about /mn
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 7:11 PM Carl George wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 12:01 PM Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 11:10 AM Jan Stanek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 4:37 PM Stephe
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 7:11 PM Carl George wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 12:01 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 11:10 AM Jan Stanek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 4:37 PM Stephen Gallagher
> > > wrote:
> > > > Also be aware that you'll need to figure ou
On Sat, Aug 2 2025 at 03:11:46 PM -05:00:00, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
It just so happens that I was about to start building a new WebKit
update anyway (update to 2.49.4). I will use your side tag.
Done.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 12:01 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 11:10 AM Jan Stanek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 4:37 PM Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > > Also be aware that you'll need to figure out what to do about `npm`
> > > and other tools that are bundled wit
Hi there,
this is half a question and half a remark. python-PyMuPDF started to
FTBFS recently with a weird error message:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/21026539
python-PyMuPDF uses swig generated python bindings from the package
mupdf. After staring at the error and koschei's list of c
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 10:04:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-07-29 at 09:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 09:37:44AM +, Frantisek Krenzelok wrote:
> > > First of all apologies for this mess.
> > > I have thought this would be actually a good way to do
The meeting was called due to lack of voting members present.
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @nirik:matrix.scrye.com at 2025-08-05 17:00:02
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 03:18:45PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> The FSH standard 3.0 was introduced in 2015.
> The changes in FSH 3.0 seem to me as a natural evolution, and
> clarification of existing practices after the 2.3 version.
>
> I believe we should officially adopt the 3.0 version and up
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 11:10 AM Jan Stanek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 4:37 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Also be aware that you'll need to figure out what to do about `npm`
> > and other tools that are bundled with the interpreter. They might need
> > their own subpackages.
>
> Yeah, we
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 4:37 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Also be aware that you'll need to figure out what to do about `npm`
> and other tools that are bundled with the interpreter. They might need
> their own subpackages.
Yeah, we are aware, but here it will depend on what the actual use
cases
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 9:41 AM Andrei Radchenko wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As a part of the big nodejs packaging overhaul [0][1][2], and exhausting all
> other 'alternatives' solutions, current idea is having separate streams e.g.
> nodejs22 nodejs24 etc, with their corresponding swappable -bin packa
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 12:46 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 7/29/25 2:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 6:30 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Jul 24, 2025, at 7:02 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Wiki -
> >>> https://fedoraproject.or
Marián Konček wrote on 2025/08/05 22:36:
There are currently about 7 packages that started to fail during the build, one
example is this https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=135172280.
Dependency changes: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/20927381
I suspect this may be bas
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 6:19 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> The FSH standard 3.0 was introduced in 2015.
> The changes in FSH 3.0 seem to me as a natural evolution, and
> clarification of existing practices after the 2.3 version.
>
> I believe we should officially adopt the 3.0 version and update the
Hello,
As a part of the big nodejs packaging overhaul [0][1][2], and exhausting
all other 'alternatives' solutions, current idea is having separate streams
e.g. nodejs22 nodejs24 etc, with their corresponding swappable -bin
packages pointing to versioned binaries. Additionally, to have a
meta-pack
There are currently about 7 packages that started to fail during the
build, one example is this
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=135172280.
Dependency changes: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/20927381
I suspect this may be bash 5.3 change. However I am unable to test
Hi Fedorans,
In the unlikely chance that you maintain a TCL package, that depends on
tcllib, and doesn't have support for TCL9 (okay, that last one is likely),
there is now a tcl8-tcllib compat package in rawhide/f43.
hth,
~spot
--
___
devel mailing li
The FSH standard 3.0 was introduced in 2015.
The changes in FSH 3.0 seem to me as a natural evolution, and
clarification of existing practices after the 2.3 version.
I believe we should officially adopt the 3.0 version and update the
Fedora Packaging Guidelines text accordingly.
Drop the obsolete
On 8/5/25 12:51, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello,
You can try to find what changed from Koschei:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/python-qcustomplot-pyqt?collection=f43
Other than that, the error seems rather simple to fix.
Hi,
It's not related to Python 3.14 - I'd guess there w
Hello,
You can try to find what changed from Koschei:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/python-qcustomplot-pyqt?collection=f43
Other than that, the error seems rather simple to fix.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hello,
I have just been going over the Filesystem Layout section[0] of the
packaging guidelines and I have noticed we are linking the Filesystem
Hierarchy Standard[1] as a whole and not a general version of it. At the
moment there are two versions mentioned on the linked website. These being
v2.3
I don't know why but my package has building error for rawhide (f43):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=135721579
There are extra files (build.log)
The package was building ok for F40..43, but recently something happened
for F43.
Did I miss something?
--
__
No objections were noted anywhere, so the package is now retired in rawhide.
--
Jan Stanek
Software Engineer
Red Hat
IM: @jstanek
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapro
Hi Sandro, happy to help, but though I have been a fedora contributor for
twenty years I have never done a review!
Do remind me if I'm slow responding, I sometimes lose track of important
tasks.
On Tue, 5 Aug 2025, 09:25 Sandro Mani, wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to bring freecad back into Fedora, i
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:31 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hi folks,
> we have published a release criteria change proposal at Fedora Discussion:
>
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-drop-intel-based-macbook-dual-boot-release-criterion/160525
>
> This is a notification to make sure every
Hi
I'd like to bring freecad back into Fedora, it was retired some time ago
due to incompatibilities between pyside2 and python3.12 (i think). Now
that freecad 1.x officially supports Qt6/pyside6, I'd like to revive the
package.
The review request is at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On 7/29/25 11:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:46 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FoomaticRipRejectsUnknownValues
I've got feedback about turning RPM scriptlet into systemd service to
have the change applied even on immutable systems, l
On 7/29/25 2:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 6:30 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Jul 24, 2025, at 7:02 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Hardlink_identical_files_in_packages_by_default
Discussion thread -
https://di
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250804.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250805.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages
30 matches
Mail list logo
