Minutes:
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-09-03/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-09-03-15.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-09-03/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-09-03-15.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbo
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:51:38PM +0200, Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
...snip...
>
> The idea I'm considering: maintain identical Go versions across all active
> Fedora releases. Ideally, starting with the next Fedora release, every new
> stable release will have the latest Go version. For exam
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 10:38 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> Also, for packages
> that use quic-go, they need manual dependency updates for new Go
> versions.
FTR, this used to be the case, but no longer is, as of v0.41.0 of
quic-go and Go 1.21:
https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/releases/tag/v0.41.0 (se
Hi,
Thanks for writing up the proposal, Alejandro.
Sep 3, 2025 2:00:52 PM Fabio Valentini :
On the other hand, I've frequently seen Go compiler updates
introducing new bugs, new lints / vet things that break compiling
existing packages.
Pushing these compiler updates to stable releases frequen
* Debarshi Ray via devel:
> This tendency of Go modules (used as dependencies) to keep updating the
> required Go version has started to bother me in recent times. It
> doesn't look like the Go toolchain strictly enforces the version,
> because I remember trying to build with an older version and
On 9/3/25 9:25 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Typically Fedora hosts have shown remote names in terminal windows
when sshed in but I've notice in a number of cases this no longer
happens on remote F-43 hosts.
Is this an expected change? I'm not even siure whether this is openssh
or if it's provided b
On 9/3/25 1:21 PM, Osama Albahrani wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 8:15 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
So, somehow, shells stopped setting PS1?
No, it is just set differently:
% podman run --rm -it fedora:42
[root@8c16d98d812e /]# echo $PS1
[\u@\h \W]\$
% podman run
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 8:15 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
> So, somehow, shells stopped setting PS1?
No, it is just set differently:
% podman run --rm -it fedora:42
[root@8c16d98d812e /]# echo $PS1
[\u@\h \W]\$
% podman run --rm -it fedora:43
bash-5.3# echo $PS1
On 9/3/25 10:25 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hey Folks,
Typically Fedora hosts have shown remote names in terminal windows
when sshed in but I've notice in a number of cases this no longer
happens on remote F-43 hosts.
Is this an expected change? I'm not even siure whether this is openssh
or if it
Hey Alejandro Saez Morollon,
My concern is different Go versions with diff Fedora versions, it'll be
great in a sense where one Go version is there in each Fx versions, this
makes us little worry when it comes to check the security patches review.
Thanks and regards,
Aditi
On 9/3/25 6:21 PM,
Hey Alejandro,
On Wed, 2025-09-03 at 14:51 +0200, Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
> Hi everyone, I'm contemplating a change to how we handle the Go
> releases in Fedora and would like community feedback before moving
> forward with a formal proposal.
+1 from me, as a maintainer of a non-trivial bu
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2025-09-04 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern
At meet...@fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/11103/
--
___
devel mailin
I think this is a known issue, but I couldn’t find the Bugzilla for it
again. Last I checked, it happens on a newly created F43 container too.
Osama
On Wed, 3 Sep 2025 at 5:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> Typically Fedora hosts have shown remote names in terminal windows
> when ssh
Hey Folks,
Typically Fedora hosts have shown remote names in terminal windows
when sshed in but I've notice in a number of cases this no longer
happens on remote F-43 hosts.
Is this an expected change? I'm not even siure whether this is openssh
or if it's provided by another component to know whe
Hi everyone, I'm contemplating a change to how we handle the Go releases in
Fedora and would like community feedback before moving forward with a
formal proposal. Currently, each Fedora release ships with a different Go
version. For example, right now:
- Fedora 41: Go 1.23 (upgraded to 1.24, se
OLD: Fedora-43-20250902.n.0
NEW: Fedora-43-20250903.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.21 MiB
Size of dropped packages:539.79 KiB
Size
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 8:36 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> It is possible to request Fedora to sign it. You will probably need
> to make some packaging changes to support it, but it can be done.
>
Ah cool. I didn't know that we had made any progress on upgrading the
signing process and adding our own ke
No longer need the package, upstream activity is minimal. It is only used by
python-pytest-watch which is not required by anything else.
Benson
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250902.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250903.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:42
Upgraded packages: 166
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 7.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages
19 matches
Mail list logo
