Fedora eln compose report: 20250909.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250908.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250909.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 10 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Unorphaning ularn

I think I've got a patch that should fix the build issue, I'll take it over. --Wart -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fe

Re: Crash related to python 3.14 in Rawhide

On 9/8/25 11:59 AM, Scott Talbert wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2025, Steven A. Falco wrote: I maintain the KiCad packages.  We have a new bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2393850 Here is the gist of it: Fatal Python error: _Py_CheckRecursiveCall: Unrecoverable stack overflow (

Re: F44 Change Proposal: Mitigate vulnerabilities/attacks by enabling kernel.kptr_restrict and net.core.bpf_jit_harden by default, and by obsoleting a package that risks to accidentally disable kernel

Corrected discourse link (broken in the last mail due to hyperkitty copy/paste): https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f44-change-proposal-mitigate-vulnerabilities-attacks-by-enabling-kernel-kptr-restrict-and-net-core-bpf-jit-harden-by-default-and-by-obsoleting-a-package-that-risks-to-accidenta

Re: Reviewing smtprelay (Go SMTP Relay)

Hi Mikel, On 2025-09-07 17:20, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: I'll take it. Thank you so much for reviewing my package. I can happily review another package in exchange. I've a few, pick anyone: - chezmoi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2386221 - minify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: Crash related to python 3.14 in Rawhide

On Mon, 8 Sep 2025, Steven A. Falco wrote: I maintain the KiCad packages. We have a new bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2393850 Here is the gist of it: Fatal Python error: _Py_CheckRecursiveCall: Unrecoverable stack overflow (used -406047 kB) while calling a Python o

Re: deprecating libatomic_ops

On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:19 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > Hi, > > with the rebase of libatomic_ops to the latest upstream release 7.8.4 I > went through the consumers of this library and reviewed the need for > libatomic_ops there. Upstream discourages the use of libatomic_ops in > new(er) projects, bec

Re: F44 Change Proposal: NTSYNC (system-wide)

On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 2:38 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > What can we do to make sure these gaming use cases work well on Fedora, even > if they're not coming from our RPM repos? If we don't want the kernel module > to be enabled by default, is there a different way to allow it to work > out-of-the

Re: F44 Change Proposal: NTSYNC (system-wide)

On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 3:39 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > > If someone can go > > through the effort to grab a patched Proton, they can load a kernel > > module. > > > > Hmm, can a user-space program load a kernel module during runtime

help needed reviewing new pkg "seergdb"

Hi team, Could you help advise what I need for this review? thanks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392647 in review template, 1. For the license part, now all files in the prep'd directory have a license. Or all files within the source tarball should have a license --- means I wil

deprecating libatomic_ops

Hi, with the rebase of libatomic_ops to the latest upstream release 7.8.4 I went through the consumers of this library and reviewed the need for libatomic_ops there. Upstream discourages the use of libatomic_ops in new(er) projects, because better alternatives exist in form of C11 or C+ +14 standa

Re: F44 Change Proposal: NTSYNC (system-wide)

On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 12:38 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 3:39 PM Justin Forbes wrote: >> >> If someone can go >> through the effort to grab a patched Proton, they can load a kernel >> module. > > > Hmm, can a user-space program load a kernel module during runtime, without >

Re: Update to systemd-0:257.9-2.fc42.x86_64 ends with a failure

On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 01:43:54PM +0200, Peter Boy Uni wrote: > I just updated one of my servers and got: > > > > - - - - - - - - - - - < > … > >>> Running %triggerin scriptlet: systemd-0:257.9-2.fc42.x86_64 > >>> Finished %triggerin scriptlet: systemd-0:257.9-2.fc42.x86_64 >>> Scriptlet outp

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2025-09-09)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2025-09-09 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: guile30 maintainer is non responsive

Tomas Korbar schreef op ma 08-09-2025 om 07:53 [+0200]: > If you would be willing to help, I would be really glad to add you as > a maintainer. Sure, no problem. Where can I find a write up of the paperwork involved in making that happen? Thanks, Paul Bolle -- _

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250908.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250907.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250908.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 31 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.96 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B