On 4/20/11 1:59 PM, Jerry James wrote:
I'm packaging a library that does some heavy mathematical
computations. The build system tries to cleverly determine whether an
Intel CPU with vector instructions is being used. Until I can
convince upstream to do this at runtime, I'll need to build
On 4/20/11 5:57 PM, Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
The least capable processor we've gone out of our way to fix things for is
the AMD Geode GX, which has MMX and 3DNow, but is also slightly less than a
proper Pentium Pro in that it
On 4/13/11 11:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
In the interests of general public enlightenment, it would've been nice
if you'd answered KK's question what am I missing, i.e., where's the
magic bit which makes llvmpipe the default? Knowledge is always a good
thing :)
The specfile contains this
On 4/13/11 5:14 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
On 04/12/2011 06:12 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
ast, ati, cirrus, fbdev, geode, intel, mga, nouveau, openchrome,
qxl, sis/xgi, vesa, vmware
Would this affect the way KVM and specifically qemu-kvm in it's default
setup for video using the cirrus driver
On 4/13/11 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
... should we work on making qemu/kvm default to something more modern/sane?
(qxl, vmware?) Does it not end up mattering (or do we need cirrus for
legacy OS support)?
It ends up being a function of the guest OS - vmware's Windows driver
will refuse
On 4/13/11 11:02 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
On 04/13/2011 03:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 4/13/11 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
... should we work on making qemu/kvm default to something more
modern/sane?
(qxl, vmware?) Does it not end up mattering (or do we need cirrus for
legacy OS
On 4/13/11 10:25 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 12.4.2011 18:12, Adam Jackson napsal(a):
negative.) The list of video drivers that see any actual use is
probably something like:
ast, ati, cirrus, fbdev, geode, intel, mga, nouveau, openchrome,
qxl, sis/xgi, vesa, vmware
A word from
On 4/12/11 11:58 PM, John Reiser wrote:
On 04/12/2011 09:12 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Basically all of this hardware is, ahem, inept. The most featureful
device supported by these drivers would be the MGA G550, which just
barely manages to do DirectX 7 (comparable to a Radeon 7000 or GeForce
2
On 4/13/11 5:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Will F16 finally ship the llvmpipe as the default software renderer?
If by F16, you mean F15, then yes.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Xorg
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 4/13/11 7:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
On 4/13/11 5:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Will F16 finally ship the llvmpipe as the default software renderer?
If by F16, you mean F15, then yes.
Hmmm, really?
I don't know. Let's ask the machine:
synephrine:~% DISPLAY=:0
There are two major package classes in Fedora that provide graphics
drivers: xorg-x11-drv-*, and mesa-dri-drivers-*.
In F15, mesa-dri-drivers now only includes drivers with DRI2 support
(radeon, nvidia, intel) and the software renderer; if you want all the
older drivers you have to install
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 09:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
And input is even briefer (evdev, synaptics, wacom, vmmouse). I'd like
to chop the -drivers metapackage down to just this set, and either make
a new metapackage in optional
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:23 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Jackson (a...@redhat.com) said:
So that's the rough plan. Comments appreciated if I'm overlooking
anything.
The question would be how we ensure that these additional drivers are in the
install image, or in the installed
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:48 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:38 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
But then, if we had _that_, comps could grow a fourth class for
as-needed and we'd just list all driver packages there, including cups
and webcam drivers and etc. Install
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:16 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
While I don't care about accelerated X support, this hardware darned
well better continue working in an it works 2D display mode. VESA or
whatever is fine.
You'll notice I included vesa in the standard list. Not that vesa works
very
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:00 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Hi,
just tried -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections on F15 xulrunner and got
libxul.so 24947928 - 23631640 (5.28% gain) and it still works.
ld.gold --icf is a different optimization but that one requires gold.
Are there some
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 22:13 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Thanks! 2.9 rc1 is in Rawhide (F16), so feel free to try building Mesa
and report any problems. If they're LLVM bugs rather than packaging
bugs, it helps to know ASAP, because unless upstream delays the final
release, it'd be
On 3/19/11 8:12 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
OK, we're most likely sitting out on LLVM 2.9 for F-15 final: OpenGTL is
hard-coded to work only with LLVM 2.8 (and they hard-coded their
previous releases too), and ldc also does not build. pure is the only
dependent package we can expect to
On 3/11/11 8:01 AM, Christian Weiß wrote:
Since AIGLX is a Fedora project, I hope that anyone here is able to
provide me with further technical information about the protocol and
the architecture - haven't found anything so far. As mentioned,
whatever comes out of this I'll gladly contribute
On 3/8/11 8:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
The biggest issue I see in that is that most thin style corp
deployments now days are moving towards (or at least looking closely
at) a VDI style deployment and most of those techs don't support 3D
either.
From a (very) cursory look at Windows 7,
On 3/7/11 9:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1
cmp C2 to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
These seem to be associated with code that does 'if
On 3/7/11 10:35 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Below is how the failure line expands(!)
Thanks, I needed a laugh this morning.
If I do this as a minimal testcase:
---
#include string.h
#include stdio.h
int
do_rm_rf (const char *path)
{
int r;
char *buf, *err;
if (!strcmp(path, /))
On 3/7/11 11:15 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Shame on me.
I forgot string.h and -Wall ;-)
With the former and -O3, I do see your warning.
Shame on me as well, -O1 or better would be needed since otherwise
you're never going to hit the simplification logic that would introduce
this message.
I
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan libgle
Taken.
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
David Boles wrote:
For some reason Fedora has serious problems with my old CRT monitor
is connected to my test machine. Fedora see 'nothing' while another
distro that shall be nameless sees 1600x00 but not the maker. Since
Fedora removed system-config-display I can no longer get a good 2D
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 11:46 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:42:12PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
What sort of attack would this enable?
Wait... any unprivileged process can create
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 13:52 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
That's precisely what I want to tell people: don't use the abstract
socket namespace, unless you really know what you do. The only cases
where it really makes sense to use it is if you have a privileged
service that i sstarted
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 13:38 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
The deeper problem is that clients authenticate themselves to the
server, but then simply trust that the server is the server they were
hoping for. If you don't have a process
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:10 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
(And of course what we're doing here is protecting against a malicious
attacker who already has enough privileges to run code on your system,
which means you're pretty far
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 16:33 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 15:25 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
I don't have any of those. If the X server is running as root (like in
the gdm case) then I can put the socket wherever I want. If it's Xvfb,
then where do I put this directory
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:11 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Misusing are ICE, X11, nspluginwrapper at least, since they do not use a
random socket name but a fixed one, hence opening the door to DoS attacks.
X's socket name isn't fixed. It's a function of whatever display name
you asked for
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 22:59 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 20.12.10 19:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu)
wrote:
this isn't exactly correct.
in /dev/shm on linux we have:
(a) unix-domain sockets for non-RT communication with the server
(b)
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 13:07 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
I would like to bring to the attention of the list another current usage
of the tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm in Fedora packages:
Jack (the Jack Audio Connection Kit, jackaudio.org) has been using the
file api (apologies if my
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:50 -0500, James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
3) Reporting to bugzilla is a mistake.
Not discounting the idea, but just looking for more detail. What
alternatives would you want to see? More kerneloops-like aggregate data
Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own,
but please keep the gratuitous me tooing to a minimum.
1) The generated reports contain far too little information for library
owners. Consider this report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658013
I get the
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
2) I really dislike that local trace generation and retrace server
are discussed as though they're the only options. If nothing else, for
many non-trivial apps where abrt is potentially of the most use the core
you're uploading can
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 15:06 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:01 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Yeah, general discovery. From the top of my head:
- Pulseaudio sinks and sources
- libvirt instances for virt-manager
- VNC desktops for Vinagre
- local web pages (think SOHO
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:05 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
I'm not going to be able to make this, I'll be on the road for
Thanksgiving.
- ajax
--
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 15:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 16:33:59 -0500, Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/17/2010 03:41 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 21:46:09 +0100, François
Camifdc-li...@fcami.net wrote:
IIRC broken
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 16:59 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:35:33PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
What kind of attack are you trying to prevent, and how do you envision
that interacting with the window system?
The classic is a hostile remote binary which secretly maps
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 08:00 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7794
RK guess you pulled that somewhere else.
fedpkg co xorg-x11-drv-intel; less xorg-x11-drv-intel/*spec
2.13.901 wasn't
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
+1 for bringing these points up. No offense to krh (because it's nice
technology) but you can pull my genuine networked applications from my
cold dead hands. I agree that I see this ongoing trend to move toward
things that are fluffy and
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 11:44 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I think we'd like to see the Fedora community figure out its position
on the subject— so that it can tell the Wayland developers If you
continue on this track, then as things stand, Fedora will not be
making it a part of the default
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:40 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
I'm wondering of I'm reading this correctly. The downsides that have
been described are quite severe in contrast to the possible benefits.
It is, of course, possible that a mistake has been made, and the acute
loss of functionality is
was a non-issue because GTK/QT apps would support both wayland and X.
Here you're saying that wayland will have network transparency?
I'm Adam Jackson. That was Adam Williamson. We look a bit alike over
ASCII I suppose, but in meatspace my hair is more likely to be
interesting colors.
And I'm saying
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 10:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:43 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
- All my X apps have to be ported! Yes, if they want to be native
wayland clients, they do.
Minor correction (I think?) - the apps don't really need to be ported
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:34 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com said:
- We lose network transparency! Well, sure, the protocol doesn't have
that directly. You can still do vnc-like things trivially and with a
VNC-like remoting is a significant loss
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:55 +, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Remoting a wayland application is _trivial_. Either to an X or to a
wayland view system. It's hard to make wayland remoting less flexible
than X over the network
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 16:26 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
The UX will probably be somewhere between ssh -Y, vncserver(1), and:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651591
Hopefully with a better security model than 'ssh -Y
I've got some stuff that I can't really give proper attention to, and
I'd rather not even get the bugmail. I just packaged them because I
wanted to consume them, not because I wanted to own them. So, free to a
good home:
bing
bootchart
powertop
wdfs
Already orphaned in pkgdb for rawhide, first
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 19:58 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
Basically summarizes the situation, and as far as I know nothing has
changed ... with default compilation options, getting callgraph
profiling on x86_64 really requires a
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 11:33 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 11/01/2010 09:12 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this
week; this is going to be a little painful, since there are some api
changes that will require minor adjustment of
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:11 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
As far as I can tell, none of the callers to pynotify.init() pass any
named arguments, so nothing should notice the lack of attach=. I only
searched for explicit calls to pynotify.init, if someone's doing like
foo = pynotify
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (2:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
NOTE: Matthew Garrett, Steven Parrish, Bill Nottingham and Matthias Clasen
are all
We've been carrying a patch to libOSMesa for far too long now to fix the
soname at .6, since there was no actual ABI change between .6 and .7.
I'm tired of porting the patch so it'll be libOSMesa.so.7 in the next
Mesa build in F15.
The only affected packages seem to be vtk and paraview, so I'll
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 17:07 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
BTW, it's annoying that rpm allows only 1 %files -f.
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.8.0
%files now accepts multiple filelists through -f (ticket #70,
RhBug:475359)
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 12:12 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Please fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635865 while you're at
it, or paraview won't build. Thanks!
Done (upstream, even), thanks!
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 01:39 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Er, really? I don't see where I offered any insult or un-excellent-ness.
I just meant it as a vaguely humorous way of wondering why Kevin was
replying to an email I sent over a week ago in a discussion which I
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 15:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to
illustrate the benefits. That way we can evaluate feasibility and
overall value add before we dive
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 11:46 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
I don't blanket label everything with open code as free software.
Some stuff bundles things which make it non-free. Code open-ness !=
free. You can call Firefox open source if you want, but it's not free
software.
You certainly have the
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 15:13 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:48:34AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Say you ship with 50 bugs in a package. As you update it through the
lifetime of a release, that number should decrease more or less
monotonically. The bugs that take
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 08:39 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:45:30PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:21 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
This here sounds strange:
| The update rate for any given release should drop off over time,
| approaching zero near
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:18 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 22.09.2010 22:45, Adam Jackson wrote:
Again: if we kept updating everything to the very latest thing all the
time, why even bother doing releases. Everyone would just run rawhide.
Right?
No, because with rawhide you get
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 22:21 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
This here sounds strange:
| The update rate for any given release should drop off over time,
| approaching zero near release end-of-life; since updates are primarily
| bugfixes, fewer and fewer should be needed over time.
This essentially
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:42 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Apologies, I won't be able to make this, I'll be on a plane headed to
France for XDS.
-
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:58 -0700, Carl Byington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a package (ghemical) which requires a courier 12 font for use in
its xwindow gui. I clearly need some dependency that will drag in
xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi
or
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
(Is it actually impossible for the vesa driver to work after
KMS has kicked in, btw, or is it just something that doesn't work at
present?)
Right now, it may work or it may not. Typically the vesa bios assumes
it's the only thing
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/26/2010 01:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If
someone else feels like owning it, go wild.
This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so, do
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic
configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a set as
default button.
Uh…
1. Not everyone uses GNOME.
Demonstrably true, but I
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:59 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic
configuration
I don't have time for it, and I think it's fundamentally misguided. If
someone else feels like owning it, go wild.
This will probably also require access to the upstream repo, so, do
speak up if you take it so we can sort that out.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 14:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is it OK to use 'git rebase -i' to compress my mistakes together into
a single working Fedora git commit? (Provided I don't push things in
between or otherwise try to rewrite public history)
Yes.
I'm a bit confused by whether
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 08:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 23:06 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
BOOTUP
- System boots successfully to GUI, when configured.
- System boots successfully to text mode, when configured.
- System properly handles being passed [1-5],
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:48 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 20:37 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Given the degree to which sysadmins are religious about MTA choice, I'd
suspect that a large proportion of people who run an MTA on Fedora are
probably already swapping it out
On Fri, 1994-08-19 at 16:22 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I want none of that useless crap, thank you very much! Applications should
be written as applications, delivered through our package repository, in a
compiled language. Web sites should just be web sites and have as little
code as
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 15:01 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
If we tolerate any non free software then what's the point? Why not
just run Windows or OSX?
Received: from mail-fx0-f45.google.com (mail-fx0-f45.google.com
[209.85.161.45]) by smtp-mm1.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:43 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at said:
I tried many things, even running for FESCo and getting voted in. As you
can
see, it didn't achieve anything either.
Is it impossible for you to accept the fact that not
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 15:00 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
EDID DDC are mere conveniences unnecessary to the function of the device. I
really couldn't care less whether EDID/DDC exists, much less works. What
matters (works just fine) from a display, which may have been manufactured
before the
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 15:13 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
For the benefit of those few, and there will likely always be some, for whom
automatic isn't, some tool is needed upstream in Xorg, possibly SaX2 or SCD
at least as a starting point. A wider call for a maintainer of SaX2 or SCD or
some
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:20 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote:
If support for text mode installation is dead (or dying), recent
traffic on the test develop list indicates that there's still a
strong need to have a fall-back installation mode. Just in case the
your particular version of Radeon, NVidia,
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 23:12 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:41:33PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
This is almost certainly the root of the problem. We don't try to set
up SDVO devices if they're not listed in the VBT, but not having a VBT
means nothing's gonna be listed
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 22:18 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 03:26:16PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org would be the place to go for this. As a
guess, you've got LVDS attached over SDVO and we screwed that up again.
I'm happy to do that, but I
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
$ i386 fedpkg local --arch=i686
...
+ ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --program-prefix=
--disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/bin
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
is much more faster and resource efficient.
With my fd.o hat on: Our experience with cgit hasn't been completely
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 11:31 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
A mass rebuild would be recommended as the new compiler will produce
faster code. I believe everything will benefit and it's worth looking
into. For example I noticed a significant difference on the OpenSUSE
distro when GCC was upgraded
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:56:50PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 16:49 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:28:16AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
* The desktop default update manager must not periodically check for
updates when the system is booted live, but must periodically check for
updates when running on
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:47 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:37 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
I can't speak to Trever's case, but I can say that it's pretty
irritating to need debuginfo for every compiler in gcc when all I really
need is debuginfo for libgcc
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 10:56 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 05/07/2010 08:48 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Although I don't agree with many of them in a
lot of places, I strongly support Kevin's, Ralf's and others position
that the current development is very harmful to the development of
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:21 -0400, James Laska wrote:
= kernel =
* 587171 kernel (a...@redhat.com) NEW - Intel kms leads to an all
black display
Upon closer reading, I think this fixed by the same patch as fixed
584229; they're still separate bugs, but that just means the logic
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 07:43 +0200, Valent Turkovic wrote:
How to recompress data already on btrfs partition?
find / -xdev -type f | while read i; do
cp $i /tmp/tmp
rm $i
mv /tmp/tmp $i
done
Obviously, don't actually run that.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 16:56 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
I did some investigation, and find a way to completely modularize
whole Erlang package. In a few words - main package consists of purely
virtual 'erlang' package and a dozens of sub-packages (from
erlang-appmon to erlang-xmerl - one
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 20:40 -0400, Mail Lists wrote:
On 04/08/2010 08:56 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
nouveau has powered down the nvidia if it's not in use for some time
now.
Ah that is good news ... which kernel are we speaking about here and
are you saying this will happen even
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 10:17 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
So I got convinced that libcrypto.so.* should be moved back to /lib in
the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559953 The libssl.so.*
will stay in /usr/lib though.
I will do that change in F14 packages. Till Maas asked me for this
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 18:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:14:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
FWIW, I figure the support is currently reasonably useless for NVIDIA
chips, as there's nothing for which nouveau-on-NVIDIA is actually faster
than intel-on-Intel in
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 13:56 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
So, how is the select of which VT X is to run on supposed to work in
F-13? It appears that kdm can get it wrong, my guess is a race between
kdm and mingetty startup. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577482
Do gdm
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 06:38 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone could enlighten me about why does --as-needed
make a difference here? (let alone the order in which -lGL appears).
Because order matters.
Linker arguments are positional. Object files are walked left to
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 01:50 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle?
* The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a
single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was
replaced with LXDM, but
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 11:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:40 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote:
from my point of view, the vast majority of users uses man to show the
wanted man-page content (the reason to add the dependency).
Agreed.
Actually, I am having problems to
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:20 +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 17:14:41 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I tried to install this new Goddard thing on my laptop and it seems to be
b0rken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572243
Any chance to get graphical
501 - 600 of 619 matches
Mail list logo
