On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 12:01 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 12.9.2011 11:26, Alex Hudson napsal(a):
I view this as entirely equivalent to having a rule about not breaking
trunk in version control: I don't know anyone who seriously argues that
breaking a project compile is a good thing
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 13:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
If something fails to COMPILE, this actually hinders development. In fact,
I'm one of the first ones to yell if package builds in Rawhide are broken
(due to some dependency breakage or whatever). Something failing to RUN is a
wholely
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 09:57 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
What do the people who are using rawhide day-in/day-out expect out of
the channel?
My expectation is something that basically works. Like others have said,
I expect occasional breakage, but my rawhide criterion is latest
version
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:52 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/08/2011 04:43 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Given that several changes are needed, it's probably best for one of
the Pino maintainers to make the update (I'd not feel comfortable
doing anything more than just adjusting for
Hi all,
I apologise if this sounds like a bit of an extended whinge; it's not
meant to but I'm not sure how better to raise these issues.
I've spent a half-hour this morning going through various bits of pino
and raising appropriate bugs, as I'm now using F15 as my full-time
system (and I'm a
Adam,
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote:
I apologise for bringing this up so late in the beta cycle - I'm sure
the beta is spinning as I type - but I honestly don't think it can ship
in this state.
As far
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 07:05 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
So, back in the good old days, one could just type this:
Just to try to get the interface left alone.
Isn't the way just to put NM_CONTROLLED=no in the relevant interface
config file? Even if you're not statically configuring an actual
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 11:04 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
I'm orphaning the following packages:
* json-glib
I'm not sure if this would be better maintained alongside glib, but I
use this library and would happily [co]maintain it.
Thanks
Alex.
--
This message was scanned by Better
Hi everyone,
I have a small issue with the review of the v8 package that I'm
currently looking at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634909#c18
The short story is this; the packaging guidelines state that for every
architecture a package doesn't build on, the .spec should list
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:09 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
This is the problem: The database migration could take a really long time. I
have testing data with 56 entries (nodes) - exporting (slapcat) is quite
fast,
but importing (slapadd) takes around 10 seconds.
Imagine you have a large
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:00 +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
You mention gnome shell but not nouveau, how do you enable the missing
3d support for Nouveau?
There's an Mesa package labelled experimental you need to install.
I don't know what the subset of hardware it works for is, but my Quadro
NVS
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 03:42 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I think Kevin's proposal is written fairly with the given information.
Still, I believe that the stable update guide needs to be relaxed for
software that doesn't affect anything other than itself. There are
single library packages that
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:35 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Alex Hudson fed...@alexhudson.com wrote:
I think there's one thing missing: some discussion about the guiding
principles about where these rules came from.
Well, there is the Boards vision that this came out of:
https
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 22:21 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 19:07 +0100, Alex Hudson a écrit :
The i18n situation is also pretty sad from my point of view too. If you
use pretty much any design app, OO Writer and Inkscape being the ones
which cause me pain
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 11:03 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm interested in font installing, but I think it might be better to
integrate this with app-install rather than packagekit, as app-install
has a pointer to a screenshot URL we can show in the preview window.
I'm not sure why this should
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 13:49 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 12:24, Alex Hudson a écrit :
What you really want is a font store which has functionality like this:
http://code.google.com/webfonts/preview#font-family=Cantarell
What you do not realize
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 15:05 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 14:29, Alex Hudson a écrit :
.TTF fonts (as an example) just aren't very big. I tried a sample font
in my .fonts directory, it's 75K and five lines of varied The quick
brown fox.. in PNG format comes out
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 09:18 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
Just to be clear. When users want a to get a new font what is the
ideal software interaction path you expect them to take to find fonts?
It's not clear that app-install is what you expect them to interact
with. I do sort of expect normal
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 18:49 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:47 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote:
I think it would be much better for Fedora to decide what it *should* be,
specifically what the Fedora userspace should be, and excel at that.
Don't follow the market or worry about
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
We probably need to attack this trend more aggressively, like putting
expiration dates into the installer after which it'll just refuse to
install
Honestly, that's just a great way to turn more people off.
There are plenty of valid
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 16:10 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
Matěj, as I'm sure you know, we could find a lawyer who would tell us
just about anything we wanted to hear. I consulted with Red Hat Legal,
and the conclusion that we came to was that it was not possible for the
copyright holders to
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 06/03/2010 11:54 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
And slightly weird that it's okay for Red Hat to distribute it
themselves, both commercially and as open source from jboss.org, but
it's questionable for Fedora.
I can't speak on what
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 15:09 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
The argument that everyone else is doing it, so it must be fine is
also completely false. As my mother eloquently put it to me at age 6,
If everyone jumped off a bridge, would you?.
That's not the argument I'm putting forward.
The
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 02:20 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
But if you want to see the kind of change to FESCo I'd like to see,
it'll take a faction of at least 5 people to make it happen.
Surely this is the point: if there are not sufficient candidates with a
particular point of view, that's hardly
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 19:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Alex Hudson wrote:
I think it's a bit disingenuous to talk about prevailing opinion of the
mailing list otherwise; to me a lot of the discussion looks an awful lot
like a vocal minority
I think it's quite cheap to write off
I don't usually throw in my 2p on subjective issues like this, but...
On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
Most of us really take pride in making sure what we push out to
the community has been tested and will not be disruptive
or destructive. Then there a small group of people that simply
26 matches
Mail list logo
