On 19:36 Tue 10 May , Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
>
> > On 10/05/2022 15:29, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> This is initial step to move JDKs to be more like other JDKs, to build
> >> proper transferable images, and to lower certification burden of each
> >> binary.
> >
> >
On 01:07 Wed 11 May , Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Summary ==
> > This is initial step to move JDKs to be more like other JDKs, to build
> > proper transferable images, and to lower certification burden of each
> > binary. Long storyshort, first step in:
> >
On 10:37 Wed 11 May , Omair Majid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > One way to reduce this burden is to not introduce new JDKs to all
> > existing Fedora streams, only add it to rawhide so certification is
> > only needed once.
> >
> > Having said that I'm still not clear on
On 17:20 Wed 11 May , Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 10:37:31AM -0400, Omair Majid wrote:
> >> AFAIK, even if you rebuild the exact same sources with the exact same
> >> toolchain with the exact same compiler flags, you still can't claim TCK
> >>
- Original Message -
On 03/08/2014 03:37 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Sorry I am missing something. Why can't we keep the old pdftk that
works with itext2?
Check the whole thread - because of GCJ dependency. iText is second
