You need to open ticket here https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/new_issue/
As soon as you get your 'packager' group back i can transfer package to you.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Thanks! labwc and wayfire updated for Rawhide [1]. Please ping when you
consider new wlroots 0.16 mature enough and start updating it for f37.
[1]:
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9bac007398
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1bbf74fbb8
JFYI: Some of new Bottles >2022.7.14 modules depends on Rust packages. Also
Bottles package which requires intensive testing every new version due
regression. I can't dedicate at this moment enough time and resources for this
but glad if you found this package useful and keep maintain it.
> do you mean if you can use rpmautospec features on packages with epel8/9
> branches, or if you can use the command line tool?
> You can definitely use %autorelease/%autochangelog in whatever package you
> build in Fedora Koji
I had to clarify this, yes i mean can i build packages with
Does rpmautospec compatible with EPEL-9, EPEL-8 branches?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
It works for me and really like this new approach. Switched couple of my
packages and no issue so far with rpmautospec itself. But some 3rd-party tools
requires some work and adaption. For example if you already switched to
rpmautospec format and try to:
$ fedpkg import foo.fc36.src.rpm
Hello. Anyone know how to contact with Konstantin Ryabitsev, FAS: icon?
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078516
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742343
- https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyotp/pull-request/2
cc: mri...@gmail.com
Eh, i missed this time due Nvidia lag with 510 driver update. But rpm fusion
folks already built [1] it so i hope it will appears in repos very soon.
[1]: https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21262
___
devel mailing list --
Asking here due:
Your message to the test mailing-list was rejected for the following reasons:
The message is not from a list member.
5.16 will contain full preemption enabled?
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/228#comment-767601
___
devel
Updated few packages which requires by new Starship. There some new modules
required as well. Need help with RR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039465
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Updated 'rust-process_control' and 'rust-versions'. New module required for
'rust-shadow-rs'. Please help with RR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039429
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Cantarell current default UI font in GNOME (Workstation) will be replaced by
Noto font as well or remain?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> Yes, bundling is allowed only for sources. You can package all dependencies
> in source form into a single vendored tarball.
OP never talked about bundling blobs, only you. Also OP never talked about
vscode.
> Flathub != Fedora. All Fedora packages must be built from sources (except
>
> All of them must be compiled from source on Fedora's infra.
No, they don't.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault#Detailed_Description
> Have you tested the build without network access? Because even Flatpaks
> download everything from npm.
"Flatpaks" using
Understood. Filed a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013168#c1.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Noticed this a long time ago when in freeze stage and this could a serious
issue sometimes. BTW please push flatpak 1.12.1 update to Stable manually since
people still complain and stuck with 1.12.0.
___
devel mailing list --
Should i disabled myself this arches for Goverlay or you add them into
`ExclusiveArch: %{fpc_arches}` and rebuild affected packages yourself? Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> I'd prefer to wait for 0.14.1
Totally agree with this approach.
> we normally don't push breaking wlroots changes into stable branches.
Yep. But few users already asking me about 'labwc' update. I personally
interesting in testing it too but i can build locally or in COPR and test it
which
Done for labwc and wayfire:
* https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71258443
* https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71258789
Thanks for updating it. What's a plan for f34?
___
devel mailing list --
Veloren and Veloren Airshipper bot using rust-nightly. you can forget about
packaging it for official repos in Fedora.
Fractal - good luck to package it Fedora.
But both packaged for a long time and available in COPR:
- Fractal: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/fractal/
-
Good to know. I am crossing fingers 爛 and hope you could improve current
defaults and this will be upstreamed. So at least users who want PREEMPT could
enable it in runtime and not need to rebuild custom kernel every time for this.
___
devel mailing
Hello.
Upcoming 5.12 allow building with dynamic preemption support which allows
changing mode at boot/run-time so finally no need to rebuild or make
alternative kernel build anymore[1]. Responsive system is a must have for
gaming and good desktop experience overall, not only for professional
Thank you for update. 'labwc' built
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=66343993
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Good to know, thanks for answer. Can we package then separate compat version
with 0.9 version? Still WIP build [1] but fully working. And already filed some
bugs [2] upstream.
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/compiz0.9/
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1923481
Hello. I'd like to package new Compiz 0.9. New version required for GNOME
Flashback [1] and also have some other nice improvements like CCSM ported on
GTK3. Currently Compiz 0.8 packaged in Fedora. The question is: should i send
PR with update current Compiz 0.8 -> 0.9 or should i made compat
❯ sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
distro-sync --allowerasing
All fine, but few packages wants to downgrade:
conmon
I did my own various tests on Ryzen (Zen 2) 4 month ago or so on Fedora 32/33
vs Clear Linux which known to be "fastest" distro and in almost all benchmarks
Fedora was equal or even faster a little bit then Clear Linux. In rare cases
Clear Linux was faster within the margin of error. Have no
Some tests: https://youtu.be/d4Sc80TMEtA
webkit2gtk3 compilation with zram-fraction=1, max-zram-size=8192
Physical RAM: 8GB.
Kernel 5.10.6
Fedora 33, with such deviations from default:
- zram-fraction=1, max-zram-size=8192 (this is default for f34)
- le9 patch -
My experience is pretty OK with PipeWire in f33. Gaming also OK and seems like
even fixed long standing issues in some games. Overall is better in terms of
CPU utilization and quality (subjectively).
But one noticeable issue - no volume control in GNOME Shell, but it available
in System
Yep. Works for me now. Both, src.fedoraproject and Bodhi.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
It's faster. Here is some benchmark with different zstd compression ratios
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/28/1930. Could be outdated a little bit though.
But for HDD it makes sense to increase it probably. And IIRC Chris wrote about
such plans.
___
Rust packaging automation. People shouldn't do work which could be done by
machine in 2020.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Vbox also available in RPM Fusion repo
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/VirtualBox/
Works OK in f33.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
How to quickly retest packages which listed here
https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/needs_br_make_packages.txt? I've tested few
locally and in Koji Rawhide scratch, but they are compiled fine.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi everyone,
I've decided to orphan packages which i am not using myself and those which
flatpak'ed to date. I'll still try to update them in time for a while until
they found new home.
Email me, comment on Google docs [1] or post here your FAS name and packages
which you want to take.
Ah, it all makes sense now.. Mail chatting lagging a little bit, so my previous
questions not actual anymore then. :) Thanks for clearing that up.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Also, if upstream against about packaging, why they added packaging status
badge then on their project page?
Availability in distros:
https://gitlab.com/BuildStream/buildstream
They against only Fedora? I don't understand at all then.
___
devel
> Also note the buildstream package is mostly useless without bst-external,
> which is unfortunately not packaged in Fedora because upstream requested it
> not be packaged
Michael, this is super weird. I pushed to repos bst-external already. And i
never seen before that upstream against
Hi. Anyone know how to contact Mathieu Bridon [FAS name: bochecha]?
'buildstream' package need urgent update. Related bug reports:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868983
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821245
- PR with fix:
@Chris, thanks, i did some tests and now we have some numbers. tl;rd the
results is pretty satisfying me, even if there no speedup in my case, but there
is a lot disk space could be saved and reduce writes. Probably not worth file a
bug, but a little bit weird that with zstd:1 still a little
I am experimenting now with various compression in Fedora and noticed slowdowns
with compression only for mock at this moment. On 4-core CPU building in mock
with zstd:1 on HDD is slower. Also 'autodefrag' and 'space_cache=v2' options
enabled on HDD.
Hi. In rare cases building packages with LTO producing binaries or libraries
which have bigger size then if they have built without LTO. For example 'kitty'
package:
* with LTO:
- koji task https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47762998
1.79 MB glfw-wayland.so
1.99 MB
BTRFS WA is ~8 times higher than ext4. Average profit from compression about
50% max. Not that hard arithmetic.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Yay, thanks a lot!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
It's awesome, but for some reason my profile not showing here. Just gray
background. :(
https://packager.fedorainfracloud.org/atim
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> Does anyone know why they are all optional there?
Don't know why they are optional but most packages from this list will not run
or retired already.
I want to suggest add game launchers here which already packaged in Fedora:
- minigalaxy
- gamehub
- legendary
- lutris
You need @fmuellner i suppose. :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_32_RC_1.5_Summary#Downloads
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
LGTM. Thank you!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Hello. Gilboa, i would like to continue maintaining IceWM. And i interesting in
'springlobby' package. Please add me as co-maintainer. FAS: atim.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754807
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> But it might be my fault.
No, i have the same issue with different packages at this time as well. But now
it's fine.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818461
CC: gilb...@gmail.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Thank you!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Hello! Lutris broken completely on F32 and many users asking what happens with
package. Lutris always up to day in Fedora and i personally doesn't have any
issues with it or all this time until this, but seems like this time '
bunnyapocalypse' just busy [1] to fix it and merge my PR [2]. Can we
Have many dupes which was already reported there, so selectively:
Problem 4: problem with installed package
minetest-5.1.0-1.module_f31+7240+cacc2d7d.x86_64
- package minetest-5.1.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit),
but none of the providers can be installed
-
Filed a bug. @Kamil, many thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Hello everyone. Previously, IIRC when we add new package for F31 the i686
version of package available for download on x86_64 systems but now there is no
'mangohud-0.2.0-11.fc31.i686` [1] if you try to install it. We need to manually
specify somewhere that some app/lib should available in
Same here. I am waiting several minutes for every my action. This is very
unproductive.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Request 768036 (accepted)
Qt 5.14.1 - untested, as usual
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/768036
That is all we need to know about how packages updating in openSUSE or
something else?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
This is awesome. Also I've been dreaming for a long time to simplified and
integrated this chain:
Playing with package in Copr → Review Request package from Copr and import it
to RHBZ in one click. This could save a lot of time and make easier maintainers
life. SUSE already did something like
vokoscreenNG packaged now. Nice to have such app available in official repos.
F31: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a489a2436a
F30: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-aa27dbce21
___
devel mailing list --
Seems like this bug:
**Kills multiple processes at once**
https://github.com/rfjakob/earlyoom/issues/121
but according to github it's fixed now.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
WINE worries me a lot. Why previous maintainer dropped it? I never have issues
with WINE package and it was always up to day. Hope someone will save package.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I did draft package of vokoscreenNG if someone interesting
RR: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787578
Works without ffmpeg. Thanks for tip @Neal.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Seems like this issue
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8477
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
No prob. :) But i didn't received any notification so this could be upsetting a
little bit if package was retired. Community barely fixed crash dump recently
[1] and Fedora users before often write me on email with various questions, so
this makes me believe that app is not useless and users
Perhaps OP should not sneaky asking for retiring functional package? Maybe he
should instead file a bug and ask maintainer first about this and discuss with
it? I might have miss this thread and didn't even notice it. TBH all this just
demotivating from packaging something at all.
> You started the drama by picking on cinnamon!
Me started drama? Cinnamon mentioned by original poster and he even post a link
on github issue where title is:
'Peek fails to start in Cinnamon on Fedora 30'
https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/485
___
> Please prevent your useless app from displaying in cinnamon menu, I'm sure
> Mate, XFCE
> and LXDE would also like it removed from their menus as well.
What is alternative to Peek? OBS Studio is totally different beast. OBS more
advanced, using Qt framework, available only in RPM Fusion repo.
> Then OnlyShowIN=Gnome in the desktop file seems like a possible
> solution.
@Kevin, i'll do shortly. Also i filed a bug in upstream
https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/539
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
> "All package dependencies (build-time or runtime, regular, weak or otherwise)
> MUST ALWAYS be satisfiable within the official Fedora repositories."
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/WeakDependencies/
> "As with regular dependencies, weak dependencies MUST be
> The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it
> doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not
> distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion):
Why we should drop such useful app just because it doesn't work on Cinnamon? It
works
For this who can't change their default zone in firewall after installing
Fedora Workstation completely block all ports may result in worse things, like
completely turn off firewall, because they can't run their online video games
for example and some one always advised them to do this.
We
Great point. Maybe in perfect world such services as VNC should have default
port <1024.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> completely disabled by default (opened all ports 1025-65535) on Fedora
> Workstation?
Not completely. Completely when from 1 to 65535. :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
BFQ scheduler help a lot with this issue. Using it on Fedora since 4.19 kernel.
Also there was previous discussion about make it default for Workstation
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ker...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I2OZWDD4QCDYUXJ5NHYTMGNAB4KLJN2K/
> Review processes exist for a reason.
Review processes is one of the best thing in Fedora and i believe this helps
with packaging quality overall. The problem is no one literally wanted to do
this in Fedora since 99% of packages reviewing one person which i mentioned
already before there.
> I see plenty of names in Bugzilla doing package reviews. If you’ve
> waited a long time, this list is one place to ask for them (review
> swaps for extra points).
This guy probably didn't know about that since he still trying to push it since
2014
Fixed
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compton-ng/blob/master/f/compton-ng.spec
> How did it pass review?
Because no one reviewing packages in Fedora. Only one person reviewing and help
witch packaging - eclipseo. Many thanks to him.
Also no one want to wait for month+ and pinging non
Hi. Bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725520
No activity for years https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/gilboa
Package is completely broken and wont even install. PR with fix
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/springlobby/pull-request/2
If there is no maintainer i wish to
82 matches
Mail list logo
