Re: jpegxl soname bump

2021-11-21 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, dem 21.11.2021 um 15:40 -0500 schrieb Scott Talbert: > Hi @eclipseo, > > Looks like jpegxl soname was bumped, breaking a bunch of stuff: > > 2021-11-21 20:20:51 > Package resolution failed > > Problem: package gd-2.3.3-3.fc36.x86_64 requires > libavif.so.12()(64bit), but none o

Re: xorg-macros

2021-11-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Freitag, dem 19.11.2021 um 06:17 + schrieb Globe Trotter via devel: > Hi, > > oclock has been orphaned from F35 so i was trying to roll my own rpm > (building off the spec file for F34). I noticed that the spec file > contains: > > BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(xorg-macros) >= 1.8 > > but I c

Re: libnsl.so.2.0.1 updated to libnsl.so.3.0.0 without coordination, broke rawhide

2021-11-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, dem 16.11.2021 um 15:32 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > On 13. 11. 21 11:03, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Freitag, dem 12.11.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' > > Esser: > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:

Re: libnsl.so.2.0.1 updated to libnsl.so.3.0.0 without coordination, broke rawhide

2021-11-13 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Freitag, dem 12.11.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > Hello, > > > > Since this update: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab

Re: libnsl.so.2.0.1 updated to libnsl.so.3.0.0 without coordination, broke rawhide

2021-11-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 15:54 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > Hello, > > Since this update: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec1954581153d0?branch=rawhide > > Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not > installable: > > Error

Re: spec file error

2021-11-11 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 11.11.2021 um 09:27 +0100 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: > On 10/11/2021 21:15, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > > Version: %ver > > Release: %rel > > You shouldn't use macroses here, because this behavior can break > release > bumps from different bots or proven-packager sc

Re: protobuf 3.19.0 update coming to rawhide

2021-11-07 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, dem 07.11.2021 um 16:48 +0900 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: > Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25: > > All builds have finished and the side tag was merged. > > > > Although everything was built successful in COPR for the real rebuild > > two rebuilds failed: > > > >   * qgis > > This is

Re: [SONAME BUMP] jsoncpp 1.9.5

2021-11-04 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.11.2021 um 21:40 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 04.11.2021 um 08:54 +0100 schrieb Adrian Reber: > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:10:58PM +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > > > jsoncpp 1.9.5 has

Re: [SONAME BUMP] jsoncpp 1.9.5

2021-11-04 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.11.2021 um 08:54 +0100 schrieb Adrian Reber: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:10:58PM +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > jsoncpp 1.9.5 has just been released and it bumps its library soname > > from 24 to 25.  The following packages ar

Re: [SONAME BUMP] jsoncpp 1.9.5

2021-11-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 03.11.2021 um 20:10 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Hi, > > jsoncpp 1.9.5 has just been released and it bumps its library soname > from 24 to 25.  The following packages are affected: > > * cmake > * domoticz > * guayadeque > *

[SONAME BUMP] jsoncpp 1.9.5

2021-11-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hi, jsoncpp 1.9.5 has just been released and it bumps its library soname from 24 to 25. The following packages are affected: * cmake * domoticz * guayadeque * libopenshot * minetest * notekit * oomd * openxr * paraview * pcl * polybar * qpid-proton * raceintospace * radiotray-ng * torque * vfrna

Re: Checking part of package version number in spec file

2021-10-30 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Samstag, dem 30.10.2021 um 23:09 +0200 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos: > Thanks a lot Björn, this is very helpful! You're welcome, Alexander! =) > All the best, > A. Best wishes in return! Björn signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Checking part of package version number in spec file

2021-10-30 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Samstag, dem 30.10.2021 um 22:00 +0200 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos: > Hello, > > I'm wondering if there's an "elegant" and "rpm" way to do the > following, without calling an external tool (and maybe adding another > dependency to a package): > > Project "foo" tracks the development of projec

cmake-3.22.0-rc1 hits Rawhide

2021-10-14 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hi, I just wanted to inform you, that cmake-3.22.0-rc1 [1] will hit Rawhide within about the next hour. The upstream ChangeLog [2] doesn't show any obvious breaking changes. If problems arise with your packages, feel free to file bugs on RHBZ. Thanks, Björn [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org

Re: final link failed: memory exhausted on armv7l

2021-10-13 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Building with lto disabled is a bad idea, as Fedora intentionally enabled lto by default. What you describe as lto requires a lot of memory is caused by building lto along with non-lto in the same object file requires significantly more memory. For that reason one can disable building non-lto alo

Re: final link failed: memory exhausted on armv7l

2021-10-13 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 16:51 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 15:44 +0200 schrieb Iñaki Ucar: > > Hi, > > > > RStudio is failing consistently on armv7l on F35 [1, 2] and rawhide > > [3, 4] with this message (mem

Re: final link failed: memory exhausted on armv7l

2021-10-13 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 15:44 +0200 schrieb Iñaki Ucar: > Hi, > > RStudio is failing consistently on armv7l on F35 [1, 2] and rawhide > [3, 4] with this message (memory exhausted). The same build on the > same machine (CPU and RAM) succeeds on F34 [5]. Any clue what's going > on? Why rawhid

Re: [RFC] Remove supoort for NIS(+) from PAM

2021-10-06 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Freitag, dem 01.10.2021 um 09:31 -0400 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 06:14, Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream > > mostly unmai

[RFC] Remove supoort for NIS(+) from PAM

2021-10-01 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello, I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream mostly unmaintained - pam_unix module (authentication with user passwd) with something using less bloated and cleaner code. This topic is currently also discussed with the upstream maintainer of pam_unix. Replacing parts o

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-20 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 15:04 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' > Esser: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > > On Thu, Aug 19

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

2021-08-20 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 16:23 -0400 schrieb Rich Mattes: > On 8/17/21 10:21 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 8/14/21 10:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > Have there been any recent changes to the arm (32bit) builders?  >

Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

2021-08-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 07:38 -0600 schrieb Orion Poplawski: > On 8/18/21 2:23 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: > > On 8/17/21 10:21 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > On 8/14/21 10:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > > Have there

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 17:40 +0200 schrieb Dan Horák: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:25:56 +0200 > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 15:03 +0200 schrieb Ondrej > > Mosnacek: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:4

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 15:03 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:43 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 14:14 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:41 PM Björn 'bess

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch,

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 14:14 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:41 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn > > 'besser82' > > Esser: > > > Am Don

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch,

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 12:43 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would lik

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > Hello, > > I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future > F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so > -> libquazip1-qt4.so and libquazip5.so -> libquazip1-qt5.so), I will > need

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-18 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek: > Hello, > > I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future > F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so > -> libquazip1-qt4.so and libquazip5.so -> libquazip1-qt5.so), I will > need

Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

2021-08-18 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 18:59 + schrieb Artur Frenszek- Iwicki: > I'm okay with this, but I don't think I've ever used side tags before > (maybe once), > so I could use a quick run-down on how to actually perform that. It's quite easy. From the dist-git branch that is going to be buil

Re: Wrong FTBFS in F35?

2021-08-17 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, dem 17.08.2021 um 09:15 -0700 schrieb Tom Stellard: > On 8/17/21 8:42 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > Le mar. 17 août 2021 à 17:21, Евгений Пивнев a > > écrit : > > > > > > As I found my package qpdfview cannot be build in F35. > > > Package marked as FTBFS: > > > https://bugzilla.red

Re: [heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

2021-08-13 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Freitag, dem 13.08.2021 um 12:44 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 16:05 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Just give me short heads up, and I'll rebuild pidgin-chime using my > > proven-packager powers. > > Hi, > thanks for

Re: [heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

2021-08-13 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 16:05 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > > Hi, > > the upcoming 3.41.2 release of the evolution-data-server next week > > will > > contain a sona

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.23)

2021-08-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 12.08.2021 um 07:57 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:27:27PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > All packages have been rebuilt successfully, except for vfrnav, which > > fails for a segfault in inkscape during the

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.23)

2021-08-11 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 11.08.2021 um 18:06 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Mittwoch, dem 11.08.2021 um 17:20 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar: > > libgps provided by the gpsd package had another API and ABI break. > > The > > following packages need to be rebuilt:

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.23)

2021-08-11 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 11.08.2021 um 17:20 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar: > libgps provided by the gpsd package had another API and ABI break. The > following packages need to be rebuilt: > > collectd > direwolf > foxtrotgps > marble > plasma-workspace > vfrnav > viking > > I tried to rebuild them loc

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

2021-08-05 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 13:39 -0400 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 18:39 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 17:41 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > > > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro H

Re: Packages that fail to install in Fedora 35 and might be retired one week before the beta freeze

2021-08-05 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 17:41 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 14:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > libpst > > Hi, > I do not own the package, only one from my pool depends on it, but > looking into the build failure, the autoconf failed to find python > binary. D

Re: [heads-up] evolution-data-server soname version bump in rawhide

2021-08-05 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.08.2021 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > Hi, > the upcoming 3.41.2 release of the evolution-data-server next week > will > contain a soname version bump of a libcamel library due to ABI > changes. > A simple rebuild should be enough for the other packages. > > Acc

Re: F35 mass rebuild is finished

2021-07-27 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, dem 27.07.2021 um 16:23 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hrcka: > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 > on Jul 21st, 2021. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements This change hasn't be

Re: Is there a command to expand Source0 from spec file to the final URL?

2021-07-06 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, dem 06.07.2021 um 17:15 +0100 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > Is this possible?  I've got one with lots of %{macros} in it. > > It seems like this should be possible using rpmspec, but I can't work > out how. > > Rich. You can either use `spectool -l rpm.spec` to get the URL ('Sou

Re: Fwd: OpenSceneGraph and gdal need to be rebuild for Fedora 34

2021-06-17 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, dem 17.06.2021 um 08:55 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Mittwoch, dem 16.06.2021 um 21:18 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' > Esser: > > Am Mittwoch, dem 16.06.2021 um 19:53 +0200 schrieb Jiri Kucera: > > > Adding devel-list for a

Re: Fwd: OpenSceneGraph and gdal need to be rebuild for Fedora 34

2021-06-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 16.06.2021 um 21:18 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Mittwoch, dem 16.06.2021 um 19:53 +0200 schrieb Jiri Kucera: > > Adding devel-list for a broader audience. My side tag will expire > > for > > a couple of days. Can some proven

Re: Fwd: OpenSceneGraph and gdal need to be rebuild for Fedora 34

2021-06-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, dem 16.06.2021 um 19:53 +0200 schrieb Jiri Kucera: > Adding devel-list for a broader audience. My side tag will expire for > a couple of days. Can some proven packager add me please to gdal, > OpenSceneGraph, and vtk as a co-maintainer so I can do rebuilds for > libgta? > > Cheers, >

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-06-08 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, dem 08.06.2021 um 15:08 +0100 schrieb Tom Hughes via devel: > On 08/06/2021 14:51, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > I was thinking about suggesting a similar PAM module to convert > > existing hashes, but I suspect that we'd be coming up against some > > issues with security policy and

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-06-08 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, dem 08.06.2021 um 09:22 -0500 schrieb Martin Jackson: > > On 6/8/21 9:13 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:18:10PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser > > wrote: > > > Unfortunately there is no automatic way to upd

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-06-08 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Di., 8. Juni 2021 um 15:46 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:18:10PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Di., 8. Juni 2021 um 14:35 Uhr schrieb Richard W.M. Jones > > : > > > > > > On Mon, Jun

Re: F35 Change: Use yescrypt as default hashing method for shadow passwords (System-Wide Change proposal)

2021-06-08 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Di., 8. Juni 2021 um 14:35 Uhr schrieb Richard W.M. Jones : > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:59:54PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > == Dependencies == > > * anaconda: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/3431 > > * authselect: https://github.com/authselect/authselect/pull/253 > > * libuser:

Re: client.cpp:104:47: error: '_1' was not declared in this scope

2020-06-23 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2020, 12:41 + schrieb Martin Gansser: > Sorry, can't access your posted links. > Regards > Martin A solution for this problem was posted in one of the links by Jonathan Wakely: > I believe in most cases this can be fixed by changing > to and adding "using boost::place

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.20)

2020-06-18 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2020, 16:34 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar: > A new version of gpsd is ready to be build in rawhide. This is a > second attempt. It now bumps the libgps soname. Per repoquery the > following packages have a dependency on libgps and will need a > rebuild: > > collectd > dir

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.20)

2020-06-18 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2020, 16:34 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar: > A new version of gpsd is ready to be build in rawhide. This is a > second attempt. It now bumps the libgps soname. Per repoquery the > following packages have a dependency on libgps and will need a > rebuild: > > collectd > dir

Re: Soname bump gloox libgloox.so.13 -> 17

2020-05-31 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2020, 11:49 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2020, 11:29 +0200 schrieb David Schwörer: > > If a proven packager could rebuild 0ad and uwsgi and submit an > > update, > > that would be great. > > Done

Re: Soname bump gloox libgloox.so.13 -> 17

2020-05-31 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2020, 11:29 +0200 schrieb David Schwörer: > If a proven packager could rebuild 0ad and uwsgi and submit an update, > that would be great. Done so. Waiting for the builds to finish. Updates will be pushed asap then. Cheers Björn signature.asc Description: This is a digit

Re: [SO-NAME-BUMP] jsoncpp.so.22 -> 24

2020-05-30 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 18:36 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > The rebuilds have been finished successfully so far, except: > > * domoticz [1], and > * polybar [2], > > which I have filed FTBFS bugs [1,2] for. I've fixed those FTBFS in the mean

Re: Packaging problem

2020-05-30 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 21:20 +0200 schrieb ycollette.nos...@free.fr: > Hello, > > I've got a problem with a package. > I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and > I've got an error: > > erreur : Empty %files file /home/artelys/rpmbuild/BUILD/jamulus- > c6b6e3ab02d7e

Re: [SO-NAME-BUMP] jsoncpp.so.22 -> 24

2020-05-30 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Hello, > > I'm going to update jsoncpp to v1.9.3 in Rawhide, which implies a so- > name bump from jsoncpp.so.22 to jsoncpp.so.24, during today. > > I will take care of rebuil

[SO-NAME-BUMP] jsoncpp.so.22 -> 24

2020-05-30 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello, I'm going to update jsoncpp to v1.9.3 in Rawhide, which implies a so- name bump from jsoncpp.so.22 to jsoncpp.so.24, during today. I will take care of rebuilding all its consumers, which are: * cmake * domoticz * guayadeque * libjson-rpc-cpp * minetest * oomd * orthanc * p

Re: Packages still using %{?_smp_mflags} manually?

2020-05-27 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 21.05.2020, 17:53 +0200 schrieb Igor Raits: > > In the spec file of another one that I've inherited, I see "make V=1 > > %{?_smp_mflags}". > > %make_build V=1 Not even neccessary since `V=1` already gets injected by the `%make_build` macro at least since F32: $ rpm -E %make_bu

Re: json-c security update for CVE-2020-12762 in testing

2020-05-25 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Montag, den 25.05.2020, 11:32 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Hello, > > as there has a buffer-overflow vulnerability [1] been discovered in > json-c recently, I've patched [2] the package to fix the issue and > pushed updates for F3{2,1,0}. [3,4] > &

json-c security update for CVE-2020-12762 in testing

2020-05-25 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello, as there has a buffer-overflow vulnerability [1] been discovered in json-c recently, I've patched [2] the package to fix the issue and pushed updates for F3{2,1,0}. [3,4] The update for F32 is already in stable, but the updates for the earlier releases are still in waiting to be tested, an

Re: Fedora+Lenovo

2020-04-30 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 30.04.2020, 21:18 + schrieb Mark Pearson: > Hi all, > > Adam Williamson suggested I stick a note in the mailing list saying > “hi” - so I’ve achieved that and officially upgraded myself from > lurker! He also suggested I take questions from the community - and > I’m very ha

Re: App updates for the new AAA solution

2020-04-23 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 18:00 +0100 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Development work has begun on the API which will give applications > > access > > to the new AAA solution. As part of our effort to migrate to thi

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 20:02 +0200 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > On 22. 04. 20 19:47, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > I created the list of packages with the following chain of commands: > > > > dnf --releasever=rawhide repoqu

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 19:02 +0200 schrieb Dan Horák: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:00:37 +0200 > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > The SONAME bump has been done, and the re-builds of all packages > > have > > finished successfully. > > looks you

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
The SONAME bump has been done, and the re-builds of all packages have finished successfully. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-20 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 19.04.2020, 18:22 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > gluster-block is currently FTBFS for some reason related to the > glusterfs package [2]. The reason for gluster-block has been FTBFS was fixed [1]. There was a clash between config.h in the build-tree and

[SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello together, as json-c 0.14 has been released today, I'm going to push an updated package to Rawhide within the next days. Within that procedure I'll take care of all needed rebuilds. I don't expect any major FTBFS, since I've already added patches to the packages that needed. The patches

Re: Heads-up: RPM 4.16 alpha coming to rawhide

2020-04-02 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2020, 14:36 +0300 schrieb Panu Matilainen: > On 3/31/20 8:24 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:43 AM Panu Matilainen > > wrote: > > > > > Based on rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz from this morning, there are > > > thirtysome > > > packages relying on this beh

Re: [SO-NAME-BUMP] jsoncpp.so.21 -> jsoncpp.so.22 (1.9.1 -> 1.9.2)

2019-11-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Freitag, den 15.11.2019, 09:09 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Hello, > > I'm going to update jsoncpp in Rawhide, which includes a so name bump. > > I'll take care of bootstrapping CMake and rebuilding of all affected > packages during today. &

[SO-NAME-BUMP] jsoncpp.so.21 -> jsoncpp.so.22 (1.9.1 -> 1.9.2)

2019-11-15 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello, I'm going to update jsoncpp in Rawhide, which includes a so name bump. I'll take care of bootstrapping CMake and rebuilding of all affected packages during today. There is an impact for third party repos, too, which needs to be handled by them. Cheers, besser82 signature.asc Descriptio

Re: python2->python3 mass rebuild and auto tools

2019-08-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 01.08.2019, 17:44 -0400 schrieb Steve Grubb: > On Thursday, August 1, 2019 4:37:01 AM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 01. 08. 19 4:43, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > Audit. But is seems that autotools shoul hard code the old > > > sematics so > > > that all packages do the right thing.

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

2019-08-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 01.08.2019, 14:28 -0400 schrieb Steven A. Falco: > The upstream KiCAD project has requested that I remove > GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS from the Fedora package, as described here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1838448 > > What is the best way to do that? I can add "%undefine

Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

2019-07-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > We have a circular dependency in the minimal buildroot: > > > > systemd --> cryptsetup-libs --> json-c > > > > > > cryptsetup needs json-

Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

2019-07-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 19:26 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot via devel: > Le mardi 16 juillet 2019 à 18:53 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser a > écrit : > > > > Which build chain does look cleaner, shorter, and more semantically > > correct? > > > >

Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

2019-07-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Igor Gnatenko: > Because of systemd-libs… It is a dependency of util-linux at least. > That ships logger and lslogins utilities which link against > libsystemd. Which I assume are not really useful nor needed in a minimal buildroot? signature.asc

Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

2019-07-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt: > > > > &

Re: nettle: heads up soname bump

2019-07-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt: > > > > nothing provides libnettle.so.6 needed by gnutls-3.6.8- > > 1.fc31.armv7hl > > Don't you love circular dependencies? > > This is really the biggest issue that we have: T

Re: [SO-NAME BUMP] jsoncpp-1.9.0

2019-07-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 03.07.2019, 13:50 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Hello, > > jsoncpp-1.9.0 has been released recently, and I'm planning to update > the > package during today, which includes a so-name bump. > > I'll take care of rebuilding

[SO-NAME BUMP] jsoncpp-1.9.0

2019-07-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello, jsoncpp-1.9.0 has been released recently, and I'm planning to update the package during today, which includes a so-name bump. I'll take care of rebuilding all its consumers, which are: cmake libjson-rpc-cpp minetest orthanc paraview passenger qpid-proton vfrnav vrpn vtk Cheers Björn si

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.19)

2019-07-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 03.07.2019, 10:39 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:31:53PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 02.07.2019, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar: > > > The following packages will need a rebuild: >

Re: libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.19)

2019-07-02 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 02.07.2019, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Miroslav Lichvar: > A new version of gpsd was released. It breaks the ABI and API of > libgps again. If there are no objections, I'll build the package in > the next few days. > > The incompatibilities are minor (reordered struct, removed redundant

Re: Bootstrapped Packages

2019-06-26 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 26.06.2019, 12:53 +0200 schrieb Brian (bex) Exelbierd: > Hi, > > Can someone point me at step by step instructions for how to handle > new packages that require bootstrapping because of a circular > depedency? > > I am about to request the first of the repos and want to make sure

Re: [HEADS UP] Unannounced soname bump of qrencode

2019-06-25 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 25.06.2019, 17:52 -0400 schrieb Paul Wouters: > This was a mistake on my end. I thought I was the owner of the > package, but I think I was only the owner of it back in el6. I assume > systemd then wasn't depending on it. I saw a PR the other day, assumed > it was to me as package

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

2019-05-09 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Japheth Cleaver: > On 5/9/2019 7:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: > > > On 5/9/19 9:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > let's drop the r

Re: cloud-init FTBFS

2019-04-23 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2019, 16:39 +0200 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > Hello cloud-init maintainers, > > cloud-init FTBFS in Fedora rawhide and it will be a problem for the > update to > Python 3.8. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695953 > > Since there has been no update by the main

Re: openmpi breakage on Rawhide

2019-04-17 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 17.04.2019, 18:09 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Mittwoch, den 17.04.2019, 09:59 -0600 schrieb Christoph Junghans: > > I think a rebuild will fix the problem: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openmpi/pull-request/5 > > >

Re: openmpi breakage on Rawhide

2019-04-17 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 17.04.2019, 09:59 -0600 schrieb Christoph Junghans: > I think a rebuild will fix the problem: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openmpi/pull-request/5 > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 9:53 AM Christoph Junghans > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Some of my packages failed to build due t

Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-03-17 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2019, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Fabio Valentini: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM John Reiser > wrote: > > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on > > > rawhide are now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for > > > all included executables and sh

Re: libvirt uninstallable in F30 Koji because of broken ceph dep

2019-03-07 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 07.03.2019, 09:53 + schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:47:51AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:29:52AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:02:00AM +, Richard W.M. Jones > > > wrote: > > >

Re: Broken dependency for devscripts in f29

2019-02-25 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 23:06 +0900 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: > > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote on 2019/02/24 21:22: > > > Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 10:39 +0100

Re: Broken dependency for devscripts in f29

2019-02-24 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune: > Hi, > > Somehow this slipped through the cracks: > > > Dependencies resolved. > > > > Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package > > devscripts-2.18.4-1.fc29.x86_64 > > - nothing provides perl(GitLab::API:

Re: Broken dependency for devscripts in f29

2019-02-24 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 23:06 +0900 schrieb Mamoru TASAKA: > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote on 2019/02/24 21:22: > > Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Somehow this slipped through th

Re: Broken dependency for devscripts in f29

2019-02-24 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune: > Hi, > > Somehow this slipped through the cracks: > > > Dependencies resolved. > > > > Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package > > devscripts-2.18.4-1.fc29.x86_64 > > - nothing provides perl(GitLab::API:

Re: mass rebuild failure page failure

2019-02-16 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Samstag, den 16.02.2019, 12:04 +0100 schrieb Fabio Valentini: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 10:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f30-failures.html > > now says "21 failed builds". I assume that nobody fixed the other > > 1k+ > > failures

Re: Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

2019-02-14 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2019, 14:41 +0100 schrieb Fabio Valentini: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:29 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > On 04. 02. 19 21:48, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora > > > 30 > > > on Jan 31st 2019. We

Re: Unannounced soname bumps: proj and geos

2019-02-14 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2019, 07:13 -0500 schrieb Elliott Sales de Andrade: > Hi, > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 17:12, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 21:09 -0500, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > > The recent bump of proj in Rawhide from 4.9.3 to 5.2.0 also bumped > >

Re: Attempting to fix hyperscan FTBFS

2019-02-12 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2019, 16:40 -0500 schrieb Jason Taylor: > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 16:35 Björn 'besser82' Esser < > besse...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > This log has "-mtune=option: not valid". I guess something has > > changed >

Re: Attempting to fix hyperscan FTBFS

2019-02-12 Thread Björn &#x27;besser82&#x27; Esser
> This log has "-mtune=option: not valid". I guess something has changed > here with gcc 9 that the cmake script doesn't like? I've tailored a patch for CMakeLists.txt to fix the build [1]. If you agree, I'll push to SCM (including update to v5.1.0) and build it. Björn [1] https://koji.fedor

Re: F29 updates-testing

2019-02-09 Thread Björn &#x27;besser82&#x27; Esser
Am Samstag, den 09.02.2019, 22:54 +1100 schrieb Bojan Smojver: > Anyone understands why this is not being pushed in recent days? Most likely because of this [1]. Since autosign was broken for some time even the packages for F2{8,9} could not be signed for while and thus not pushed to the testing

  1   2   3   >