Re: Re: koji / bodhi issues status update

2020-01-08 Thread Brad Bell
I do not understand the state of the following build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40063178 When I attempt to resubmit it I get: cppad>fedpkg build Could not execute build: Package cppad-2020.0-1.fc31 has already been built Note: You can skip this check with --skip-nvr-

GenericError: cannot update build

2020-01-03 Thread Brad Bell
I do not understand this error message; i.e., I have no idea what the cause is ? Looking at the informaiton for the build     https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40063178 The only failure message I see is     GenericError: cannot update build 1425936, state: COMPLETE The output

fedpkg push warning

2017-03-18 Thread Brad Bell
What does the waring below mean ? cppad>fedpkg push Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/model.py:526: UserWarning: 'git_checkout_notify_t' has no values explicitly defined; next version will refuse to guess which integer type it is meant to be

Re: rpmlint FAILED for cppad-20160000.0-2.fc24

2016-02-05 Thread Brad Bell
# I am reading buildroot so that I can test the installed version of the include files (better testing that using the ones in the build directory). Perhaps rpm-lint can be fixed so it does not generate a warning in this case ? On 2/4/2016 6:22 AM, Brad Bell wrote: I have comments at the top of

Re: rpmlint FAILED for cppad-20160000.0-2.fc24

2016-02-04 Thread Brad Bell
I have comments at the top of the spec file that explain the reason for the warning below. In addition, I have posted messages about this warning on this list; see project.org/thread/GI3L74J47OLRTYLQIMSEUA7SUZR5VLU7/#JUUSDFET2HBPUDIP3G7CPHB7Q7XCCLEG Should I just ignore the message below ? On

Re: Re: Re: python distutils on Fedora 20

2014-11-09 Thread Brad Bell
createrepo_c-libs-0.4.0-1.fc20.x86_64 ... How does one fix these type of errors ? On 10/28/2014 5:43 AM, Brad Bell wrote: Thanks Alec: I was using the executable g++ which was installed by the gcc-c++ package, so the gcc-c++ package was installed on the Fedora 20 system. Your comment about locate

Re: Re: python distutils on Fedora 20

2014-10-28 Thread Brad Bell
agree ? On 10/26/2014 5:51 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2014-10-26 13:35, Brad Bell wrote: I have a python setup.py script that works on Fedora 19 and not Fedora 20. I have tried posting a question about it to python-devel; see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/python-devel/2014-October/000639

python distutils on Fedora 20

2014-10-26 Thread Brad Bell
I have a python setup.py script that works on Fedora 19 and not Fedora 20. I have tried posting a question about it to python-devel; see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/python-devel/2014-October/000639.html but have not gotten any response. Would someone please direct me to the proper

Could not execute build: failed to connect

2014-02-03 Thread Brad Bell
I recently did a build for f19 and got the console output: [bradbell@localhost cppad]$ fedpkg build Building cppad-2014.2-1.fc19 for f19-candidate Created task: 6484083 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6484083 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... ...

Re: Re: Package_update_HOWTO

2013-02-28 Thread Brad Bell
p On 02/28/2013 05:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 05:02:56AM -0700, Brad Bell wrote: I often use the web page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO and have a few edits to suggest. Who would be the proper person to contact ? It's a wiki..

Package_update_HOWTO

2013-02-28 Thread Brad Bell
I often use the web page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO and have a few edits to suggest. Who would be the proper person to contact ? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Finding build.log for an automatic build that failed.

2013-02-23 Thread Brad Bell
In the bugzilla report below, the link http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4959059 works but the other links below do not. If I follows the link above, I see the message Result BuildError: error building package (arch i686), mock exited with status 1; see build.log for mor

el6 g++ bug message during a package build

2013-01-09 Thread Brad Bell
I am upgrading a package to the new version of its upstream source for 2013. The corresponding correctness tests have built and run fine for the master, f18, and f17 branches. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4848365&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?task

Re: Re: rpm-buildroot-usage

2011-01-22 Thread Brad Bell
The www.coin-or.org server seems to be down, so I have placed a copy of the CppAD spec file at http://www.seanet.com/~bradbell/cppad.spec On 11:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:54:13 -0800, Brad wrote: > ... snip ... >>> Can you upload the spec file to some public plac

Re: Re: rpm-buildroot-usage

2011-01-21 Thread Brad Bell
On 11:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:57:09 -0800, Brad wrote: > >> I am using the compile directive >> -I%{buildroot}%{_includedir} >> during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed >> copy of the include files instead of the copy in the distr

rpm-buildroot-usage

2011-01-19 Thread Brad Bell
I am using the compile directive -I%{buildroot}%{_includedir} during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed copy of the include files instead of the copy in the distribution (and hence is a better test of the install). The problem is that rpmlint complains with the

pkg-config, noarch, and rpmlint

2011-01-17 Thread Brad Bell
I have a case where a package is noarch and it provides pkg-config support. The problem is that pkg-config expects a noarch file corresponding to the package to be stored in ${_libdir}/pkgconfig and rpmlint complains that cppad.spec:112: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package devel %{_lib

fedpkg new-sources

2011-01-17 Thread Brad Bell
Kevin: Thanks for you message about the new sources. Unfortunately, I do not have a copy of the mail message to reply directly to, so I am including its web address below: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/147704.html I uploaded a new version of the upstream source