Re: rawhide in mirrors.fedoraproject.org

2021-08-03 Thread Carol Bouchard
Thank you Florian. I'll chat with my peers on this. Carol On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 3:41 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Carol Bouchard: > > > I have test scripts upstream which runs UTs and valgrind checks for > rawhide. Recently they > > broke due to the follow

rawhide in mirrors.fedoraproject.org

2021-08-03 Thread Carol Bouchard
I have test scripts upstream which runs UTs and valgrind checks for rawhide. Recently they broke due to the following error and similar with mirrors.fedoraproject.org: Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:00 - Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for https://mirrors

Re: Fedora 33 fails upgrade for rcm-tools-fedora-rpms

2021-03-23 Thread Carol Bouchard
This is possible. I've been having issues with my laptop and booted a number of times. I am fine now. TY Carol On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 7:49 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:34 PM Carol Bouchard > wrote: > > > > I saw this error just before my upgr

Fedora 33 fails upgrade for rcm-tools-fedora-rpms

2021-03-22 Thread Carol Bouchard
I saw this error just before my upgrade to fedora33 and I'm now seeing it after the upgrade. How do I fix this since I need brew to work? Before Upgrade: CM Tools for Fedora 33 (RPMs) 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'rcm-tools-fedora

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-15 Thread Carol Bouchard
Thank you for the details Daniel! On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:22 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:16:58AM -0400, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > Since Fedora is also making the change, I'm wondering whether this voice > > should also > > be heard.

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-15 Thread Carol Bouchard
Since Fedora is also making the change, I'm wondering whether this voice should also be heard. They're assuming it's just GLib. Carol On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:09 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:50:18AM -0400, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > Hi

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-15 Thread Carol Bouchard
ort? >1.3) Will the trend to larger MINSIGSTKSZ values continue for Intel > processors? On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:02:27AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > It's going to require more than removing the h

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-04 Thread Carol Bouchard
I'm going to reach out to glib team. I wished all I had to do is remove their preprocessor code but I don't think it is that simple. I much appreciate your help on this issue. Carol On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:02 AM Carol Bouchard wrote: > It's going to require more than removi

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-04 Thread Carol Bouchard
ems enough in practice. */ long double ld; long l; void *p; } alternate_signal_stack; On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 6:48 AM Carol Bouchard wrote: > Thank you. I may very well do that. > > Carol > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:57 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > >> On

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-04 Thread Carol Bouchard
Thank you. I may very well do that. Carol On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:57 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:13:29PM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > In our code base (restraint), we patch and recompile the m4 code base. > > https://github.com/tar-mirror/gnu-

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-03 Thread Carol Bouchard
Z 16384 #endif On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:05 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Carol Bouchard: > > > Thank you Daniel and Richard. I'm going to have to study this some to > > understand how this solves the compile issue cause the glibc code > > isn't gone. It's s

Re: Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-03 Thread Carol Bouchard
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:07:48AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > > I'm seeing the following compile error in my product which I'm not > seeing > > > with earlier versions of Fedora. > > > > > > > > >

Fedora/f35 compile error

2021-03-03 Thread Carol Bouchard
I'm seeing the following compile error in my product which I'm not seeing with earlier versions of Fedora. *make[4]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/restraint-0.3.2/third-party/m4-1.4.18/lib' CC gl_avltree_oset.o CC binary-io.o CC c-ctype.o CC c-stack.oIn file i

Re: ld core dumped with s390x architecture

2020-11-06 Thread Carol Bouchard
Adding Tomas Kopecek into this discussion. On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 8:49 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:33:09AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > I reran my build and it is picking up the old version. Is this an issue > in > > brew/dist-git? Am I exp

Re: ld core dumped with s390x architecture

2020-11-06 Thread Carol Bouchard
39 AM Carol Bouchard wrote: > Thank you Petr! > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:10:09AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: >> > I am a developer to Beaker Project which manages tests for various >> distros >> >

Re: ld core dumped with s390x architecture

2020-11-06 Thread Carol Bouchard
Thank you Petr! On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:10:09AM -0500, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > I am a developer to Beaker Project which manages tests for various > distros > > such as > > Fedora 34. I'm trying to build

ld core dumped with s390x architecture

2020-11-06 Thread Carol Bouchard
I am a developer to Beaker Project which manages tests for various distros such as Fedora 34. I'm trying to build a restraint release and there exists an build issue with Architecture s390x. The error I'm seeing is as follows: collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fau