Re: Security update process without CVEs

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's not 7 days at least. It's 0 days at least. It's 7 days at least *if > you get no positive karma*. Yes, but nearly 90% of these security updates receive no karma feedback still, they lack tests. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

Re: Security update process without CVEs

Which poor sod will be the victim in 7 days at least before pushing to stable? ;) Then comes another question, does security updates need to be treat as special? It's just an original update with a tag "security alert", but users still need to wait 7 days unless they enable updates-testing. -- de

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

On Jan 24, 2014 7:14 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > In other words: Christopher, if you're currently doing this, please move > the packages to a COPR or other venue more appropriate for this purpose, > and stop doing it. No absolutely not. I don't have any thing *

Re: LibRaw soname bump

It built very well(I did it this afternoon), you can check it out from Koji. Hmm...Only some tiny issues need to be solved. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Review swap: BZ#1055721 - qpid-dispatch

Swap with this one if you want: stjerm - A roll-down, quake-like terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055915 -- -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: LibRaw soname bump

Jon please don't rebuild oyranos, I'm working on this now. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

On Jan 22, 2014 10:03 AM, "Mauricio Tavares" wrote: > Still, it makes sense to have a place to beta test either the > package or the packaging (how to create a proper package?) itself. It's hard to say how to create a proper package testing in one slot of pkgdb. Also it may be a burden when

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

Seriously, it's harmful to provide unstable packages to users. And I don't think Fedora has a long term support. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: RPMbuild mystery parameters "--with" and "--without"

I first thought it was just kind of something like what gentoo packages do in their ebuilds, but then I also found that it's useless sometimes as described by Richard. Hereby comes a question, do we have any plans of let users install packages from sources(crazy of course...) with bcond defined al

Re: SELinux RPM scriplet issue annoucement

IMO a SOP need to be documented or linked to selinux-policy package update also. BTW not all people run enforcing mode in daily time, so sometimes problems may not be found easily. Thanks. -- -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel

Re: sunpinyin

On Jan 15, 2014 10:19 PM, "Michael Schwendt" wrote: > > > Anyone being familiar with "sunpinyin" please help with this "re-review": > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1043504 Well, the assignee is one of the Chinese packagers, still active in chinese list. I will see what I can do. -- devel mailin

Re: directfb, fusionsound packaged, review for submition and sdl2 bridge

The original maintainer orphaned it because it depends on kernel module more and more. Any thoughts? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Perl autorequires failing for git-svn

I just found that auto requires no longer works as expected. My package postgrey contains on binary writing in perl but auto requires returns nothing. I'm using rawhide, similar to f20 IMO. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaned packages up for grabs

I've taken rawhide/f20 and el6 branch of netpipe, anyone else comaintainers are welcome. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

ew. > > I'll provide Fedora builds and repo later. You can build it on copr! -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Go packaging guidelines?

re if it's accurate for Fedora. Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: How to get packager sponsorship

Sometimes sponsorship is quite easy, this is unfair to other people around: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048966 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-condu

Re: Package review of the_silver_searcher is stopped.

Can upstream come up with a better name? ;) It has a long name and contains a binary with naming collisions. IMO someone should advise upstream to change name like "silversearcher" or "tss". -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve

Re: enlightenment 0.18.1 etc...

IIUC, are you building multiple libs into one big RPM? > All of the EFL subpackages now ship in a single tarball I don't think we should follow up. This is not allowed IMO. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of C

Re: Review swap: python-sphinx-theme-better

Swap with: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860 WIll be "Ready" soon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Review swap - rename

Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1047414, even simpler than yours. ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: review swap: python-funcparserlib and python-webcolors

Swap with this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347 Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Request Tracker v.4

I was packaging some Perl modules of rt4 a month ago. If you want help, I can do it. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Review swap: python-astropy

Deal. I will review yours later. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Review swap: python-astropy

Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433 if you like. I need to handle these remaining bugs now. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc

Re: EPEL for RHEL7 Beta

You can check epel-devel list, we just discussed something there. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Shared System Certificates followup: Packaging Guidelines?

Can be also extended for Mono snk key file stored in /etc/pki. We should also let packagers to use the system shipped key file instead of using the bundled anymore. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: h

pacemaker in Fedora and RHEL

he package in Fedora behind the one in RHEL in spite of the maintainer of these two are the same people? Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: --Wl, -z, relro in LDFLAGS required?/Inconsistency when not using %configure

I still can't see any updates in the guideline, what should we do for this kind of case? Still allow no ldflag macro inserted? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: orphaning packages

I just took "dreampie" Sounds useful for me. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Adding vagrant images to the Fedora build

Check this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: debuginfo packages available in updates later than regular packages.

Isn't it should be implemented implicitly in RPM? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Mono guidelines

, but like I've said before, no guidelines here. And I asked current mono maintainer to bring mono 4.0 for Fedora later, do we need some time to revise the current ancient Mono guideline? Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт. http://cic

Re: ExcludeArch being ignored when building spring f20.

Adding files must be accomplished by git add, or fedpkg won't include it due to a bug in GitPython. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: /usr/share/xsessions and window manager

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:00 PM, "Germán A. Racca" wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > I fail to see what is the wrong location in your opinion. Do you think that > a window manager should install its desktop file in /usr/share/xsessions or > in /usr/share/applications? Hi,

Re: root rebuild failed after glew update

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, punto...@libero.it wrote: > hi > Hadoop has nothing to do with glew ... > can you please add the part, of the build.log, where fails to compile? > regards > gil http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=479029: Checking for libhdfs ... no Checking for

/usr/share/xsessions and window manager

ons mutter installs desktop file to /usr/share/applications byobu installs desktop file to /usr/share/applications So I think that maybe these have been doing wrong for years? Should I file RFE for these? Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт. http:

Re: Self Introduction

This package is in my plan, I will help do an *informal* review. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [pkgdb2] call for testers, bug reports and RFE

Maybe an RFE: pkgdb2 should be able to scratch the %{summary} in RPM specfile as the short summary of the package automatically, especially when some packages change their summary in the spec. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: How to escape question mark / equality sign in spec's source URI to get proper source name

On Nov 14, 2013 6:21 PM, "Matej Stuchlik" wrote: > Maybe use only the name of the source file, and add a comment above > explaining that it comes from that URL? > > You can use "checklist-cce-feed?id=295#nameofthesource.tar.bz2", but I'd say ^ is > the best idea. > > Matt +1 here although it's j

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:39:25AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: >> Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision. >> >> Please consider. >> > What would help is if you could add to the ticket what makes this

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)

Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision. Please consider. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Self Introduction

a month assigned to the > current maintainer and there's been no response. Is there a policy on > transferring ownership of an abandoned package? See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Fєdоґa ї₴ al$

Re: Removing myself from mldonkey maintainers

Hi all, Being as the comaintainer of mldonkey, I'm willing to take it as the lastest version update is pushed by myself. However this is an ocaml package and I'm not familiar with ocaml, the bug 640399 about bundling codes is not easy for me to fix. If anyone is also interested in this famous so

Re: Retiring stratagus

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Hmmm... http://stratagus.com/ lists version 2.2.7 from 2012-08-20, > but Fedora only ships 2.2.4 from 2007-04-08. Of course it needs an update. Many other packages are in the same situation. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: How long should last the "submitted for stable" phase in bodhi?

Maybe a new feature in Bodhi 2.0? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: pycairo

So any new progress here? I haven't seen any updates still so far. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:22 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Christopher wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 5:38 AM, drago01 wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>> On 10/30/2013 10:27 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: >

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

ntinue to exploit. Now, we could argue that ~/.local/bin is *just as* visible as ~/bin, because they are both on the PATH, but please don't argue that because attackers have choices, then all choices are equivalent. The former is debatable (and can probably be measured with a simple user survey

Re: Packages have "proxy" word.

Censorship? I think we have no reason to change the package name because of some governments‘ being evil. Have you tried opening a ssh tunnel proxy for firewall breaking? Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Cod

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-31 16:00 UTC)

Please check #350 again. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

course, one can always check the contents of $PATH directly... but there's some level of trust here... because that can get quite long, and lazy users like me assume (perhaps badly) that if we didn't modify it in our login scripts, it wasn't modified to include any additional user-writable paths beyond ~/bin And, the xdg argument doesn't seem like a sufficient argument for me... we're talking about login scripts, not X. It is very unintuitive that an xdg-related directory would be on the default path for a bash login, if you're not even running X. This is a bash profile... not an X profile... The biggest problem isn't that it's hidden or that it's there by default, or that it's writable by potentially bad-behaving software. The biggest problem is simply that users don't know about it. I certainly didn't. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Orphaning ghemical and related packages

Some of them are being developed again on GitHub. If no one want to take care of them, I can take. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: $HOME/.local/bin in $PATH

ted.html.en) > > which does not make wrong and *dangerous* behavior correct > > a *hidden* *user writeable* directory *in front* of PATH is > plain stupid security wise and there is not but and not if +1 -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- devel mailing list de

Re: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups

It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are working for Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical base but are there any plots for other people? Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Re: Review swap

I also have plenty of packages: Re-review request of mlmmj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933 herbstluftwm - A manual tiling window manager: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: Lack of response about sponsorship

Errr... I just hope if a packager is also its upstream, we can sponsor him quickly as well. Also applied to "comaintainer as upstream". And if people coming from some Big Company like Oracle/HP, we can sponsor them as well as normal guys. See an example of mindi-busybox, packager from HP still ca

Re: pycairo

On Oct 24, 2013 1:26 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: > Right. So, I would suggest: > > Since the rename review is stalled, someone update and submit a new > rename review (closing the old one as a duplicate) then get it > reviewed. > > The only slight wrinkle in this is the folks who have commit on pycai

Re: pycairo

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > Note that the package was renamed anyway, without waiting for the rename > review request to be completed: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pycairo.git/commit/?id=c700bd496bee56d8f0de03ef4d57a34d1a97bcf0 And I would ask why he can do t

Re: pycairo

adness(who is of course alive and has commit acl, too) can update it. But I think my words are tiny. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Introducing of Pierre Jourdain

Hello, nice to meet you. Just a note that your name linked with this gmail address is: "" Hope you've noticed that. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Con

pycairo

is a name change request to change it to python-pycairo(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731891). Can anyone offer some help there? Thanks in advance. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Always playing in Fedora Project http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: aarch64 support bugs obsolete?

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > Hm, I get 404 on that URL?! http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/stage4/ Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Always playing in Fedora Project http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

RE: %ifarch note

On Oct 11, 2013 1:55 PM, "Mamoru TASAKA" wrote: > > > Since I hit this, I'd imagine other people might. > > If your package has: > > > > BuildArch: noarch > > > > It will set %{_target_cpu} to "noarch". > > > > If you also use %ifarch in that spec file, you might be expecting it to > > match %{_ar

Re: gnome-boxes downgrade in F-19

Let's see how many bugs are existed now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/bodhi -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: rawhide report: 20131008 changes

Are there any people not seeing this and using non-gmail services? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: mc alternative: Double Commander

Side note: I've also sent review request to the BZ. If someone can give me a better solution of gtk/qt widgetset, which means keeping these 2 in 1 package, welcome. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989791 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989792 -- devel mailing list devel@

Re: Python Package Review Swap

I can take it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Orphaning Package: cfengine

I've taken f19+ branches, if anyone want to maintain el5+ branches, please go ahead. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: oyranos build loop issue

Side note: I'm maintaining oyranos. It depends on elektra 0.7 but elektra upstream just notified me update. Unfortunately oyranos doesn't support elektra 0.8+. If you think that Xcm problem is a bug, feel free to file a bug. http://sourceforge.net/p/oyranos/feature-requests/13/ -- devel mailing

Re: Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > So let's drop the Fedora releases effort and we can all just run Rawhide. > It's not a joke now in some cases. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: F20 KDE session login options

I had same issue after I installed it 15 days ago. I should test sddm before approved it... CC now. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Release Ownership for oyranos

I now maintain elektra, I will update it later after some bugs solved. I will take this package for a while. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Retiring libeio

+1 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: seeking sponsorship to be newpackager of aoetools

On Thursday, September 5, 2013, Ken Dreyer wrote: > I can sponsor you, assuming that you'll be following the "co-maintain > to get sponsored" process and Christopher will offer help with > aoetools if needed. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_spo

Re: orphan

Sure. Just apply. BTW looking at d homepage I found ldc has plan to move to llvm, and version is bumped. Maybe we need an epoch and restart working on it? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fed

Re: Qt 5.1 with GLESv2 support

Yes. Quoted from http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qt5-qtbase.git/tree/qt5-qtbase.spec "BuildRequires: pkgconfig(glesv2) pkgconfig(gl)" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/co

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:00:02AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: >> I've solved the bug 992800 as tqsllib FTBFS caused by openssl version. >> >> Please see >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

I've solved the bug 992800 as tqsllib FTBFS caused by openssl version. Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992800 If no response still, please release his ownership. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fed

Re: Overall rawhide package testing.

A script typo in README: 13733 packagea are reported here. should be: 13733 packages are reported here. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

***HEADS UP***: quvi family 0.9 landing and LICENSE CHANGE.

cerely, Christopher Meng Always playing in Fedora Project http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Unresponsive maintainer of plasma-widget-menubar

Oh? The Changes wrangler? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Fwd: EPEL Lighttpd vulnerability still unfixed after 9 months

ew version and push it through EPEL's buildsystem. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel -- *Yours sincerely,* *Christopher Meng* Always playing in Fedora

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

Oops... I think I should use krb5 Ignore all my emails... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

Till, can you unblock libgssapi? I can maintain it for serf. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

Just got the perms of pylons. Please don't retire it. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

I want to know the reason, why he retired it. If there is a new package, which will replace it? Or just retired it because of 'I have no time'? Gssapi affects serf library, and serf library affects subversion. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Proposal for new package group: Development:Formal Methods Tools

在 2013-8-18 AM3:31，"John C. Peterson" 写道： > > > I would like to edit comps.xml to add a new package group for the tools > that have already been packaged by the Formal Methods SIG. I just want to know if Group tag is needed or not, I never add Group tag in any specs of mine. -- devel mailing list

Re: Release packages ownership

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> libquvi >> -- >> A cross-platform library for parsing flash media stream >> >> libquvi-scripts >>

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

I don't know what happened with libgssglue. This was retired for what reason? It affects too many... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F-20 Branched report: 20130823 changes

What about this? perl(Digest::SHA) I've seen many broken ones because of it now. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > What things we do _now_ could be > improved with the investment of some effort? Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect the mass rebuild. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fed

NOTE: Serf library 1.3.1 will land in f20 and rawhide soon

Hi, As serf upstream has released 1.3 and 1.3.1 bugfix for a long time, I'm going to push an update in the next week. Upstream had changed to scon so there needs some work. Serf is the default client library of Subversion and Apache OpenOffice. Subversion has been built with serf support for a wh

Re: aoetools package updates from upstream

在 2013-8-21 PM1:28，"Tomasz Torcz" 写道： > Also on related note: vblade package (the AoE server) was on > recent orphans list. If it's not taken, the other half of aoe stack > will disappear from Fedora. Damn... it's deprecated now. Can Dennis unretire it? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedora

Re: aoetools package updates from upstream

在 2013-8-21 AM3:51，"Ed Cashin" 写道： > > Hi. > > I'm an upstream maintainer for the aoetools, the user space software that complements the aoe driver in the Linux kernel. Hi, I think I've taken this package as if I didn't take it, it will be orphaned, even retired. I'm happy to see upstream can ma

Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?

在 2013-8-20 PM7:15，"Tadej Janež" 写道： was missing. > Who should I blame: > - the techne package which detected shapelib and tried to build against > it, or > - the package which introduced this dependency and/or did not also put > in a Requires on shapelib-devel? If it can be built on f19, I think

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

Hi TIll, The maintainer of package python-pylons is a zombie. I just realized that I'm on CC list but not co. I'd like to take it. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.o

Re: Self Introduction

Where is your package? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

Don't retire my package, I have no time to fix them in this week, will check them at least from next Monday. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: mass rebuild update

在 2013-8-19 PM7:49，"Ralf Corsepius" 写道： > Please postpone this. IMO, this is much too early. > > Also take into account what time of year it is: Summer Holidays (at least in Europe). > > Many people have been on vacation and some still are (Around here, summer holidays end early/mid September). +1

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >