On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:08 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Hi Ankur,
>
> Ankur Sinha writes:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > The packaging team is generally quite stretched, and we frankly need
> > more people helping us out.
> >
> > The main issue with newcomers taking on packaging is that the learning
> > cu
Peter Robinson writes:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>> >
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoIfcfgFiles
>> >
>> > == Summary ==
>> > Do not not include NetworkManager support for legacy network
>> > configur
Bumping this for technical discussion. We are planning to put this in action if
there are no technical objections.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021, 4:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:52:40AM -0000, David Duncan wrote:
> > Bumping this for technical discussion. We are planning to put this in
> action if there are no technical objections.
>
> Please wait until the
Great News! Much appreciated!
David Duncan
http://about.me/davdunc
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:37 PM Christoph Karl wrote:
>
> Am 14.03.21 um 23:32 schrieb clime:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have just finished port of libravatar.org service to server provided
> > by Fe
> ...snip...
>
>
> I think this is a great idea and we should do it, but I have some
> questions. :)
>
> We currently use 'fedimg' to upload ami images, and it currently uploads gp2
> and 'standard' images. Do we need to then modify fedimg to upload gp3?
>
I am working on replacing the curren
Now that awscli2 is out and functional. Gwyn and I are thinking it's time to
retire the original awscli package in favor of this one. We are thinking that
it will be best to keep the awscli (v1) maintained until the release of F39
later this year and retire it from the active releases it at that
Thanks Neal!
Responding inline, but from gmail, so it's not as pretty as I would like.
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 2:15 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 3:02 PM David Duncan wrote:
> >
> > Now that awscli2 is out and functional. Gwyn and I are thinking it&#x
the CentOS Stream and ELN
communities. If you ever decide to return as a Fedora/CentOS/RHEL user for
your own reward, I'll be in the line that welcomes you back and looks forward
to your help.
--
David Duncan
___
devel mailing list -- deve
Hi,
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 12:28 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I may try increasing the virtual disk size as I assumed 8GB was enough just
> to play around, but why is it trying to allocate space for swap when it
> should be using zswap?
>
Are you sure that it is a function of the Virtualbox i
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 2:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 3:35 PM Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 3/24/22 15:46, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 2:40 PM David Duncan > <mailto:davd...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> &g
> On Apr 5, 2022, at 8:08 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:54 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateLegacyBIOS
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> Make UEFI a hardware requirement for new Fedora installations on
>> platforms that support it (x86_64)
> On Apr 7, 2022, at 2:31 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 2:20 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On the cloud side, it's been very difficult to articulate any benefits
>>> for supporting UEFI when the majority of the consumers of Fedora Cloud
>>> don't have any press
> On Apr 22, 2022, at 6:44 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> what would it take to allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without
> fedpkg?
>
> The instructions at
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/pull-requests/#_you_are_not_a_packager
> assume they run Fedora (o
14 matches
Mail list logo
