On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 4:51 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> All mentioned fc42 packages are "installed", not "from ".
>
> Apparantly, "noopenh264-2.6.0-2.fc43.aarch64 from fedora" is the only
> available package which fulfills the requirement
> "libopenh264.so.8()(64bit)" of "package
> chromium-13
Hi all,
Due to $REASONS I will have reduced capacity to work on Fedora
packaging for the foreseeable future, and will probably not be as
permanently available on Matrix as I have been. If you need to catch
my attention, please DM me on Matrix, as I will likely be checking
public rooms (and emails)
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 3:36 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> As other have pointed out earlier this isn't an accident. This is
> precisely so that when user space observability tools (profilers,
> debuggers, tracers, etc.) are installed they work out of the box.
But it's also clear that "when user sp
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 4:57 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
> Steven A. Falco wrote on 2025/09/11 23:37:
> > I tried to upgrade my rawhide VM; it is using the XFCE desktop. I got the
> > following:
> >
> > Problem: conflicting requests
> >- nothing provides webp-pixbuf-loader(x86-64) needed by
>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 4:44 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> I tried to upgrade my rawhide VM; it is using the XFCE desktop. I got the
> following:
>
> Problem: conflicting requests
>- nothing provides webp-pixbuf-loader(x86-64) needed by
> xfdesktop-4.20.1-2.fc43.x86_64 from rawhide
>
> Look
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:53 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
>
> As Fedora 43 gets into Beta I wanted to upgrade my system.
>
> Problem 3: package chromium-139.0.7258.138-1.fc43.aarch64 from fedora
> requires libopenh264.so.8()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>- installed pa
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 6:01 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm afraid there are significant changes in the dracut version 108 to push it
> to F43 at this point (unless there's wide consensus; maybe a FESCO ticket?).
>
> I do strongly prefer that approach, as even though I tried to verify th
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:50 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 9/9/25 12:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Is anyone else seeing a big jump in initramfs files? Is it expected?
>
> Yes. Looks like the blame is nvidia-gpu-firmware. Several new firmware files
> have
> been added and they are large fi
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:08 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I just noticed this ~168% size increase in initramfs files on Fedora 42 (they
> are Fedora 43 kernels, shouldn't matter).
>
> 35M -rw---. 1 root root 35M Jul 8 19:33
> initramfs-6.16.0-0.rc5.65.fc43.x86_64.img
> 59M -rw---. 1 roo
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 3:19 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> with the rebase of libatomic_ops to the latest upstream release 7.8.4 I
> went through the consumers of this library and reviewed the need for
> libatomic_ops there. Upstream discourages the use of libatomic_ops in
> new(er) projects, bec
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 2:38 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> What can we do to make sure these gaming use cases work well on Fedora, even
> if they're not coming from our RPM repos? If we don't want the kernel module
> to be enabled by default, is there a different way to allow it to work
> out-of-the
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 3:14 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 5 2025 at 12:41:11 PM -00:00:00, Miloš Komarčević
> wrote:
> > The heif-thumbnailer is a slightly different story, as it doesn't
> > rely on gdk-pixbuf. Nonetheless, I have just asked upstream to add an
> > option to disable
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 2:52 PM Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote:
>
> The idea I'm considering: maintain identical Go versions across all active
> Fedora releases. Ideally, starting with the next Fedora release, every new
> stable release will have the latest Go version. For example, by the time of
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 1:53 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> a new dracut version 108 [1] will soon land in Fedora Rawhide. Please let me
> know if you encounter any problems.
>
> In case you are eager to test it right now you can use COPR or a scratch
> build posted in the source-git PR [2
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 10:38 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> Also, for packages
> that use quic-go, they need manual dependency updates for new Go
> versions.
FTR, this used to be the case, but no longer is, as of v0.41.0 of
quic-go and Go 1.21:
https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/releases/tag/v0.41.0 (se
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 3:32 AM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> On 8/24/25 2:59 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > If nobody steps up, the
> > package can still be retired from Fedora 43 until the start of the
> > final freeze (October 7).
>
> Automatic package retirements as
On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 2:55 PM Link Dupont wrote:
>
> I’ve orphaned system76-keyboard-configurator. I don’t have the determination
> to port it to gtk4. I can leave it orphaned for now in case anyone else wants
> to pick it up, or I can manually retire it if that’s preferred.
Thank you, that's
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:54 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 09:22:55PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:02 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 2:26 PM Mark Wielaard
&g
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:02 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 2:26 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>
>> It certainly looks that way. The ar format is not ideal to rewrite in
>> place, which is why it is unpacked and repacked like this. Which isn't
>> super efficient, but somewhat sur
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 4:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am planning to implement this Fedora 43 Change in one week (on Aug 20,
> 2025):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Retire_gtk3-rs,_gtk-rs-core_v0.18,_and_gtk4-rs_v0.7
>
> The packages in the
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 11:32 AM Timotheus Pokorra
wrote:
>
> Hello list,
>
> I want to let you know that I plan to retire the packages sparkleshare
> and webkit2-sharp from Rawhide.
>
> Upstream of sparkleshare will not be continued.
> https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/issues/2006
>
> webkit2
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 3:53 PM Ming Lei wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to add `export RUSTFLAGS="${RUSTFLAGS}
> --cfg=io_uring_skip_arch_check"`
> during %build, however looks it doesn't work, please see the following log[1]:
>
> + export 'RUSTFLAGS=-Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=
On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 10:40 PM Ryan Bach via devel
wrote:
>
> Ryan Bach wrote:
> > Just added it here now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388374
> It is a duplicate, anyone know when the fix is going to be pushed out? Thanks
> in advance.
The fix should be in:
https://bodhi.fedor
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 7:49 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-08-14 at 19:32 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > I think bijiben and gtksourceview4 are suspicious and maybe
> > > orphaned in error.
>
> Hi again,
> okay, I want the gnome-sig to take over the bijiben package. I took
> over
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 8:15 PM Christian Stadelmann
wrote:
>
> Hm, it does not seem to work. For these links, I get 404 error codes in both
> Firefox and Epiphany (GNOME Web):
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libarchive/history/?identifier=rawhide
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libarch
Hi all,
As part of the Fedora 43 mass branching, bodhi updates that were
intended to land in Fedora Rawhide but which were prevented from
landing there due to failed gating tests were unpushed.
This is because these updates will require manual intervention to land
correctly, i.e. new builds for R
Hi all,
I am planning to implement this Fedora 43 Change in one week (on Aug 20, 2025):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Retire_gtk3-rs,_gtk-rs-core_v0.18,_and_gtk4-rs_v0.7
The packages in the Change document will be retired in both rawhide
and f43 branches.
Not all affected applications h
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 3:49 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 8/10/25 16:43, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 12:45 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>
> >> My recollection is that having unmerged side tags around the release
> >> branch time
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 12:45 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> My recollection is that having unmerged side tags around the release
> branch time can be an issue. Is my memory correct?
Yes, this is a problem, since open side-tags could only get merged
into the new "branched" release, but not into r
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 12:28 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> It silently fails to detect the use of rpmautospec and updates the spec
> anyway. See https://pagure.io/rpmdevtools/issue/128
>
> This caused me a bunch of grief today with the octave update.
Sorry about that. It looks like an update to
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 5:03 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 4:50 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:29:32 +0200
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 3:56 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 4:50 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:29:32 +0200
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 3:56 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> > >
> > > a F-42 mock build on my s390x machine run fine, so I suspect it's a
> &
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 3:56 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> a F-42 mock build on my s390x machine run fine, so I suspect it's a
> parallelism issue ... I mean g-ir-scanner starting before the glycin
> library exists.
Aha, I think I see where this issue is coming from, though I don't see
*how* it can happ
On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 3:09 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 14:58:49 +0200
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I had seen this issue intermittently before, but now it is preventing
> > builds of glycin (update to 1.2.3 and fixes for mi
Hi all,
I had seen this issue intermittently before, but now it is preventing
builds of glycin (update to 1.2.3 and fixes for missing dependencies)
on Fedora 42. Until recently, retrying builds made it pass after a few
tries, but now the issue happens on every build - and I have no idea
what's goi
On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 2:44 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
> I am planning to merge the side tag twice
I don't think this works. The side-tag should get deleted if it's
empty after the first bodhi update is submitted.
And I'm not sure if bodhi lets you submit two updates for the same side-tag ..
On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 11:09 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 08:12 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'll reply to this thread once I've a side tag ready with the
> > evolution-data-server built in it.
>
> Hi,
> the side-tag is f43-build-side-115950 , you can build into it with:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 10:38 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 4:16 PM Jos de Kloe wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > as suggested on this Directory_Replacement page I tried to solve this
> > problem by adding a little lua scriptlet.
> > Unfortunately it seems not to work fo
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
>
> Due to alphabetical ordering, freerdp was rebuilt against the old fuse3
> before fuse3 was rebuilt and introduced the soname change which broke
> fuse3. That broken state was merged by the mass-rebuild. The old
> problem.
The order of
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 2:56 PM Marián Konček wrote:
>
> I can see a benefit of this in case of `/usr/share/licenses/`. I don't
> know what other kinds of files are identical across multiple packages.
This Change Proposal is not about cross-package optimizations - it's
for deduplicating identical
On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 10:37 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> I'd rather we show extra care towards Fedora developers who are still
> using Fedora, if there are any. If we make Fedora development overly
> complicated compared to working in a completely different environment or
> distro, people may mi
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 5:03 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 15. 07. 25 12:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:48:50AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > There is a bug for qemu
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 6:23 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 11:38 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:56 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, I'm proposing to remove the support c
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:56 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> > So, I'm proposing to remove the support code (and templates, etc.) for
> > this mode of operation from rust2rpm with the next major version, and
> > to replace it with documentation [...]
> Documentation works if people know it ex
Hello Packagers,
Long story short: A not insignificant part of the rust2rpm code base
is dedicated to dealing with non-crate packages (i.e. running rust2rpm
with "--path " for a local Cargo.toml file, instead of pointing
it at a crate from crates.io).
This mode of operation requires special-cased
On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 6:40 PM Germano Massullo
wrote:
>
> Richard Fontana has given his answer to the license question
> https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/668#note_2600398017
>
> I am planning to resume eza packaging soon
I wouldn't say that "I haven't looked closely e
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 1:36 PM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On 09/07/2025 12:16, Jan Stanek wrote:
>
> > I recently ran into build failure in the upcoming nodejs24, on i686
> > architecture (yay!). It seems like some of the sse vector instructions
> > are not defined, on just this arch:
> >
> >
Hi all,
I'm working on updating glycin (the next-gen image loading framework
used by GNOME) from version 1.2.2 to 2.0-alpha.6 in rawhide - other
releases part of the GNOME 49.alpha (loupe, snapshot) already require
this version (and a new gdk-pixbuf backend does too).
With the update from v1 to v
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:07 PM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_support
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-drop-i686-support-system-wide/156324
>
> This is a proposed Change for Fed
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 12:09 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:50:10AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > > Reading through the feedback, wouldn't it be better to take
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 5:14 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 6/25/25 9:36 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > I hate to be pessimistic but I think it is premature to say it is "solved"
> > until
> > users use the new Wow64 mode. I'm trying to get the merge in this week.
>
> Rawhide, 10.4-5, i
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 11:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Reading through the feedback, wouldn't it be better to take a second
> look on the previous change:
>
>
> Dne 24. 06. 25 v 12:02 Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
> > Since Fedora 37, leaf packages (i.e. packages that are not depend
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:19 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 10:42:22AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 7:46 PM Eduard Lucena
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > > As I did it
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 7:46 PM Eduard Lucena wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> As I did it in discussion.fp.o, I need to remind everyone that the latest
> update of Fedora Strategy [1] that one the objectives is to grow our users
> base, so potentially killing gaming goes directly against that strateg
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:33 PM Richard Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 24 June 2025 at 14:19, Chris Adams wrote:
> > anybody can fork something and make a bunch of commits.
>
> For the sake of all of our sanity, I'd really appreciate if FESCo could
> decide on this one really quickly (e
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:07 PM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_support
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-drop-i686-support-system-wide/156324
Note that this was mis-tagged (both
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 5:27 PM Pierre Rogier wrote:
>
> wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389_Directory_Server_3.2.0
Hi,
I wonder why you pre-announced this yourself?
It should get announced on the devel-announce list shortly anyway.
Fabio
--
___
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:45 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> There are no tickets for the agenda, so I'm cancelling today's
> meeting. I'll prepare/chair the next meeting too.
>
> = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
>
> #3416 Change: Deprecate the async-std Rust crate
> https://pagure
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 1:40 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/3/25 11:48, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 05:12:41PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> We had recently changed how we handle debuginfo in JDK:
> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/147
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, 20:41 Cristian Le via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 10 June 2025 20:15:25 CEST, "Marcus Müller" wrote:
> > - the spec generated by rust2rpm doesn't tell me much; an rpmbuild of
> the result lists about 100 missing dependencies of the kind
> "crate(ba
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 3:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [28/05/2025 15:24] :
> > >
> > > No, I don't think we'll make the issue public. Among other reasons,
> > > there is a lot of dis
Hi all,
The packaging changes related to the "Modular GnuPG Packaging" Change
[0] have landed in rawhide now:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-233d32eb30
The detailed changes can be viewed in the associated Pull Request [1].
Please let me know if you encounter any issues relate
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 9:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 09:52:14AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 09:17 -0700, Brad Smith wrote:
> > > Sometime ago I asked a similar question on matrix (or IRC?) Fedora
> > > Devel and some very kind person provided t
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @decathorpe:fedora.im at 2025-05-13 17:01:59
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process (@decathorpe:fedora.im, 17:02:21)
* TOPIC: #3385 Change: Java25 A
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-05-13 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 1:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I have a failure in %configure which only happens on i686:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2710279
It looks like you're hitting this issue:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12726
> > configure: error: C compiler
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 11:55 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> > Is using %{_libdir}/x/y/z necessary? What are the reasons?
>
> In this particular case, it's the MariaDB stack.
>
> The 'libmariadb.so' is in the '%{_libdir}', but then there are some
> plugins, some restricted plugins, some test plugins,
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 11:26 AM Pavol Sloboda wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently working on rebasing a package that creates a shared library
> and I want to place it in %{_libdir}/x/y/z. I am using the
> /etc/ld.so.conf.d/%[name}.conf file to do so. My question is:
> Do I have to call ldconfig in
On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:06 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:20 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 03. 05. 25 v 4:33 odp. Chris Adams napsal(a):
> > > > What
Hi all,
The update to magma 2.9.0 that landed in rawhide a few hours ago
bumped the soname for libmagma.so (from `libmagma.so.2.8.0()(64bit)`
to `libmagma.so.2.9.0()(64bit)`) which was not announced or
coordinated with dependent packages.
The only directly impacted package seems to be "python-tor
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 03. 05. 25 v 4:33 odp. Chris Adams napsal(a):
> > What do you do with bugs that never get addressed in any way? I've got
> > a few bugs that I've been testing and rolling over to newer Fedora
> > releases for years, with little or no ma
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:23 AM Remi Collet wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> See https://github.com/kkos/oniguruma/
>
> => "This project ended on April 24, 2025."
>
> I see some projects using it
> bat
> bfs
> comrak
> git-delta
> jq
> kitutuki
> lino
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 9:00 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> So today I came to update a package I created a couple of years back
> using rpmautospec - python-pyasyncore . When I created the package, I
> had it use %autochangelog :
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyasyncore/c/4536a3345
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 5:05 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hum, it appears that the method documented here does not work as I
> > would have expected:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_one_to_many_replacement
> >
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 12:17 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> >
> > > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
> > > longer be available by default, and instead moved to the optional
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
> > longer be available by default, and instead moved to the optional
> > `gnupg2-g13`, `gnupg2-utils`, and `gnupg2-wks` packages.
>
> In the merge request I see "Recommen
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> So, some things I wonder about this process (in no particular order):
>
> If this lightweight process is easier, will not people just use it over
> the normal process? So, it will be harder to see who is completely
> unresponsive. There will
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 4:29 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Though it would probably make sense to change the OpenPGP signature
> > verification macros to only depend on gnupg2-verify (or maybe even sqv
> > or sqopv) when that is the only
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:17 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 23. 04. 25 v 10:17 Jiri Vanek napsal(a):
> > Hello!
> >
> > Mikolai have summed up nice sumamry :
> > https://github.com/judovana/java25-chancongratualtionsge
>
>
> https://github.com/judovana/java25-change
>
> This is likely the correct
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 7:47 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Do you have any opinion on which new optional subpackages should or
> > should not get pulled in by default on new installs?
>
> I'm not familiar with all the components either.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 3:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:37 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
> > longer be available by default, and instead moved to the optional
> > `gnupg2-g13`, `gnupg2-utils`, and `gnupg2-wks` packages.
>
> In the merge request I see "Recommen
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 1:18 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 03:56:28PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> > On 4/15/25 12:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen > > <mailto:ssmoo...@redhat.com>> w
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:04 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 06:21:20PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> > The only remaining blocker from official Fedora repos, is - to my knowledge
> > - wine, which pulls in 32-bit multilib libraries on x
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:32 Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:21 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé
&
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> >
>> > Has anyone gone through the effort of removing i686 from a wide reaching
>> > non-leaf package? Any adv
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:31 AM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
>
> I think the practical effect of the lightweight process will be: new
> contributor likely becomes the de facto maintainer of the package,
> while bug reports continue to be assigned to the non-responsive main
> admin.
>
> Maybe it's b
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:57 AM Milan Crha wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Common history was always a thing.
> >
> > Hi,
> > are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:21 AM Rajeesh K V wrote:
>
> > During the upgrade I've noticed this message output in the console:
> > /usr/sbin cannot be merged, /usr/sbin/arptables points to
> > /etc/alternatives/arptables
> > I assume it's related to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_b
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 6:58 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 11:21 -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 10:47 -0500, Michel Lind via Rust wrote:
> > > Dear maintainers,
> > >
> > > Fabio just flagged that below is now broken in Rawhide because
> > > netlink-
> > > pac
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:30 PM Milan Zamazal wrote:
>
> I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there
> (without libpisp for now).
>
> Wim, would you like to rebuild pipewire-plugin-libcamera there when you
> have some time?
>
> libcamera-apps fails to build due to using depr
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:32 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>
> > Is the main reason lack of maintainers? Many of these C packages work well
> > on constrained and embedded devices.
>
> Yes, nobody wanted to maintain it and the current maintainer doesn't want it
> either.
Lack of maintainer upstream
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 2:34 PM Marek Blaha wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 1:23 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > It looks you are rebasing sdbus-cpp.
> >
> > Then either bundle the old library into the rebased package at build time.
> > I.e. in sdbus-cpp.spec do:
> >
> > BuildRequires: sdbus-cpp
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:31 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> =
> # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
> =
>
> Meeting started by @decathorpe:fedora.im at 2025-04-01 17:01:10
Forgot to include links to the min
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @decathorpe:fedora.im at 2025-04-01 17:01:10
Summaries for individual topics provided by decathorpeLLM. 😉
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Roll Call (@decath
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2025-04-01 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Hi all,
I ran a last check for package downgrades from Fedora 41 to 42, and
submitted a last batch of four updates that were obviously just missed
by the package maintainers. With the Final Freeze starting tomorrow,
they would need some testing and positive karma to land in the F42 GA
repositories
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 2:17 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> A while back I updated the mingw-qt5 packages to 5.15.16 in the
> f42-build-side-103601 side tag, but then apparently forgot to submit the
> update. Now it looks like the side-tag is expired, and while the builds
> are still around, I c
Hi all,
I've been working on the Rust dependencies for GNOME 48 (both updating
existing packages and submitting new ones through review). There's now
only three reviews left that block updates for loupe (Image Viewer)
48.0, snapshot (Camera) 48.0, and glycin (sandboxed image loader)
1.2.0:
- rust
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:01 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It's this time of the year again. Looks like there's quite a few
> updates that were submitted to Fedora 41 but not to Fedora 42 and / or
> Rawhide.
>
> Some seem to be either caused by
1 - 100 of 1310 matches
Mail list logo
