: | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
--+---
Changes (by kparal):
* cc: qa-devel@… (removed)
* cc: pschindl, adamwill, test@… (added)
* component: Blocker bug tracker page => Test Day
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/
at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2016_10_14_Cloud.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/494>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedor
adobe cloud service
adobe telephone support
1800-769-2805
adobe tech support1800-769-2805 phone number 1800-769-2805
by priya bhatt
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/489>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quali
adobe cloud service
adobe telephone support
1800-769-2805
adobe tech support1800-769-2805 phone number 1800-769-2805
by priya bhatt
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/488>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quali
Whoops, this can be closed as far as I know. Only 15 months late :)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/436#comment:4>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mai
:| Keywords: l10n, fltg
Blocked By:| Blocking:
---+
Changes (by kparal):
* component: Blocker bug tracker page => Test Day
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/480#comment:1>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.o
#481: New "Milestone" needed for Fedora 24 (in fedora-qa trac for new tickets)
--+
Reporter: anipeter | Owner: tflink
Type: defect| Status: new
Priori
assistance to get the image for testing,
help testers on test day etc. The list of items to do will be listed soon.
Thanks Ani Peter (apeter)
FLTG
[1] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule[[BR]]
[2] - bit.ly/1TdUirs
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/tic
:2015-08-20_NetworkManager
Thank you,
Lubo
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/477
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
any help with the above from the Fedora QE.
We'll also be thankful if someone more experienced with the test days from
the QE community could help us get more promotion of the event.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/477#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora
/pipermail/fltg/2015-July/000290.html
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/473
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
:| Keywords: l10n
Blocked By:| Blocking:
---+---
Changes (by anipeter):
* component: Blocker bug tracker page = Test Day
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/473#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora
it.
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T434
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/470#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
.
Does anyone else have this problem?
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/470
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
mediawiki will redirect from the old URL to the new one, so existing
announcements should not cause a problem.
Thanks!
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/468#comment:4
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
:| Keywords:
Blocked By:| Blocking:
---+---
Changes (by anipeter):
* cc: lijli@… (added)
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/468#comment:5
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
:| Keywords:
Blocked By:| Blocking:
---+---
Changes (by anipeter):
* component: Blocker bug tracker page = Test Day
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/468#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality
.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/462#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
:
-+-
Changes (by adamwill):
* milestone: Fedora 21 = Undetermined Future
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/443#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel
or closed?
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/437#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
?
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/436#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/433#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
, because we usually consider blockers as FEs if we reject them as
blockers. so we probably only need two states.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/453
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel
* resolution: = duplicate
Comment:
whoops, moved to phabricator:
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T320
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/453#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
:
Blocked By:| Blocking:
---+---
Changes (by pschindl):
* cc: qa-devel@… (removed)
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/452#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/SOP_Test_Day_management to
create wiki page.
Also please write some short description which I could fill in to calendar
entry.
If you need some help, let me know.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/452#comment:2
Fedora QA http
:|
--+--
Hi,
I would like to schedule a test day for Jenkins [1].
Proposed test date: 30th September
Thanks
[1]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Jenkins
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/452
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
: pschindl@… (added)
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/443#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
: = adamwill
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/443#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
):
* resolution: = fixed
* status: new = closed
Comment:
Moved to [https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T31
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T31]. If interested, please
add yourself to CC there. Closing.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/313#comment
= closed
Comment:
Pushed to develop
[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=7615e07ee1b9728625f0c0210c28153cf94a24e6
7615e07ee1b9728625f0c0210c28153cf94a24e6]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/416#comment:6
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org
-dev.fedoraproject.org is now configured to be SSL only. Please re-
open if you notice any issues.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/431#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa
with this is that if a user sorts data manually by
(component,id), jquery sorts it just like listed above, but I don't think
it matters that much, we need both list to be sorted same in the default
state, right? What do you think?
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/416#comment:3
Fedora QA http
would be to turn off default sorting in the jquery table, so
the table would be fed with data sorted by a sql query:
If that leaves us with a functional, sortable table with a default sort
order that matches the IRC list, I'm fine with it.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket
is swapped between web ui and IRC script.
Ideally the ordering should be the same. Thanks.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/439
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel
:
This was supposed to be fixed with #416 but apparently not so much.
Marking as a duplicate and re-opening.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/439#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa
think?
Correct. However, it turns out there are more issues with the update sync
code that prevents this from being fixed easily (updates deleted from
bodhi remain in the app's db as if they were not deleted...). I will
investigate further.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
: new = closed
* resolution: = fixed
Comment:
tflink has done this. Closing.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/359#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de
, I want to put this all in phabricator. I'm just hesitating on
asking people to use it until we have FAS integration.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/436#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
Comment:
Fixed in
[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=39c5a3e28d22e157cd0a29efcdb328f257325489
39c5a3e28d22e157cd0a29efcdb328f257325489]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/435#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
in a rolling fashion. We need
tree URLs where content is not changing in order to produce consistent
test results.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/437
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa
issues here (and add a new component for it), or somewhere else?
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/436#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel
://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/435
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
, please update the ticket and we'll look into the
possibility of a different fix.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/433#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de
://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/357#comment:6
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
:
Fixed and merged in develop
[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=e0ecaf9136a454e5f1690a82b3ab4de0e9531be0
e0ecaf9136a454e5f1690a82b3ab4de0e9531be0]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/316#comment:5
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora
Comment:
All missing dependencies has been pushed to el6 stable. Closing.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/417#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel
Future
Comment:
There are licence issues with python-jsmin, moving to Undetermined Future
until it is resolved.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/357#comment:4
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
documentation location, it might be good to place it
somewhere here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Tools
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/432#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel
-qa/ticket/432
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/431
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
tracker page |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked By:| Blocking:
---+
Changes (by atodorov):
* cc: tflink@… (added)
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket
:
Fixed in
[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=ea3d4374710be7ee6762072746bddbdb7aa85716
ea3d4374710be7ee6762072746bddbdb7aa85716]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/428#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora
: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/428
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
Comment:
Patch sent for review [1].
[1] http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/56/
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/428#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa
(by mkrizek):
* resolution: = fixed
* status: new = closed
Comment:
Merged in develop
([https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=6d16cd89ecf56210cf7f7876766816c5e6ca3e1c
6d16cd89ecf56210cf7f7876766816c5e6ca3e1c])
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
-qa/ticket/427#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
-qa/ticket/427#comment:4
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
final blocker.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/427
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
final blocker.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/427#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
this was user error. I'm supposed to remove both Whiteboard:
RejectedBlocker and the Blocker: blockbug# when reproposing for a
different blocking bug. Sorry about that.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/427#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality
on the delay but the fix has now been deployed to production. It
appears as if bugs are being removed from the list as they are closed, so
I'm closing the ticket.
Please re-open if this turns out not to be the case
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/421#comment:6
Fedora QA http
(by mkrizek):
* owner: tflink = mkrizek
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/423#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
.
* master: e37129e7a5c119d43ac296a09d0f7ff9e8d42795
* develop: 0383287a5fa3e04df5d5db1c5d4229903a63dd3c
I will be getting a new version into stg soon, will close this ticket once
it has been deployed to production.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/421#comment:5
Fedora
.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/421#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
but couldn't get into the production machines and promptly forgot
about it.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4060
Either martin or I will look into this as soon as we can get logs or if we
can get this reproduced locally
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
to use the config value instead of the hardcoded url base
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/423
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
: f907f5d00d660668e65ed4b8fa00ad49dccf92a7
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/386#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
: = fixed
* status: new = closed
Comment:
This will be obsoleted by the new admin interface. Closing.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/401#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/414#comment:5
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
= Undetermined Future
* cc: qa-devel@… (added)
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/358#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
@… (added)
* milestone: Fedora 19 = Undetermined Future
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/359#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel
* resolution: = fixed
Comment:
The fix for this has been reviewed by infra and was pushed to production.
closing
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/414#comment:6
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
: = fixed
* status: new = closed
Comment:
forgot to close this when it was pushed to production. It has been fixed
for a while now
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/390#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
/fedora-qa/ticket/419#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
permissions so that testing the new version of the blocker
tracking app can continue
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/418#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa
://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/417#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
consistent as component,bzid for both lists
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/416
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
the app can't write the cookiefile
it needs to function. I'm not sure how this ever worked, but it shouldn't
be too hard to fix.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/414#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
: be2a20b9c6868909af279bec6e0ccda53cb36b1a
Merged into develop:0da6216fa5db6f816bf37ea0491c525b9f942081
built as 0.3.0.3.1, ready for deployment to production, assuming freeze
break request is approved by infra
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/414#comment:4
Fedora QA http
with the cookiefile that python-bugzilla is
using, I'm trying to reproduce in staging so I can come up with a fix
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/414#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel
:
This is fixed with recent migration to FAS-OpenID in develop branch.
Closing.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/388#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel
:
Fixed in
[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=78d1594157f95ca9e6e9d538f19add8a9439cb3f
78d1594157f95ca9e6e9d538f19add8a9439cb3f]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/383#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality
shouldn't tb and the save operation should complete
successfully
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/390
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
* resolution: = fixed
Comment:
Fixed in
[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=0b8ea6d6ef2e3bddc64aeea7c2afe2a1d9034da3
0b8ea6d6ef2e3bddc64aeea7c2afe2a1d9034da3]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/372#comment:1
Fedora QA http
of
the things that we're going to be doing soon is to rip out the current
auth and replace it with FAS-OpenID. The current method of raw FAS access
isn't going to be around for too much longer.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/388#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org
* resolution: = fixed
Comment:
This has been fixed within #347, closing.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/361#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel
Comment:
Fixed in
[https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=afa342039f8f3a890c295bda98a659b0c2b55780
afa342039f8f3a890c295bda98a659b0c2b55780]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/382#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
:
This has been fixed in git and production:
46cba60751c18790ddb0b066efed8925f919040f
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/380#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing
bug.proposed_nth or bug.accepted_nth:
is_nth = True
}}}
bug.proposed_nth and bug.accepted_nth need to be changed to
bug.proposed_fe and bug.accepted_fe, respectively.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/382
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
for the sync cron job to run as.
This will be fixed as part of #374 and its child tickets
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/378#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de
was able to propose a bug as a blocker through the stg instance - I
think this should actually be working now. Please re-open if you see other
errors.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/371#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
be separable from app logging.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/375
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/376
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/377
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
:
After looking through the logs, this appears to have been a database
setup/migration issue. I believe it has been fixed now. Please re-open
this ticket if the issue still exists.
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/368#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
/fedora-qa/ticket/370
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
: = fixed
Comment:
Fixed in
[http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=4ffd2dd5700cab8c676ce794720f1e9a5edeb485
4ffd2dd5700cab8c676ce794720f1e9a5edeb485]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/348#comment:3
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Comment:
Fixed in
[http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/blockerbugs.git/commit/?h=developid=4ffd2dd5700cab8c676ce794720f1e9a5edeb485
4ffd2dd5700cab8c676ce794720f1e9a5edeb485]
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/349#comment:2
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora
= mkrizek
--
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/367#comment:1
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo