gt; Jan
Is this a different scenario?
~$ repoquery --whatprovides libnetapi*
samba-client-libs-2:4.2.0-2.fc22.x86_64
samba-client-libs-2:4.2.0-2.fc22.x86_64
dnf repoquery did require the full text as your example above.
dnf-0.6.5-1.fc22.noarch
yum-utils-1.1.31-27.fc22.noarch
___
Regards
Fra
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:21:43 +0200
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> One thing I've seen a few times at the time Yum didn't have that
> protection was « I don't do development, so I can remove Python »
>
> It did lead to a few people not having Yum installed any more.
>
I don't have all the history\chag
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:25:46 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310#c29
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproje
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 18:59:35 +0530
Vidhun Vinod wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I'm currently working on refining the GSoC idea "Infrastructure for
> FreeMedia group".
As someone on the Freemedia team,
would you mind letting us know what your trying to do?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:34:28 +
Álvaro Castillo wrote:
> Could be include JFS into Anaconda to next release? What's your
> opinion about JFS?
Apology wrong thread, in prior email:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2014-February/009195.html
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.com
--
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:34:28 +
Álvaro Castillo wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Just that. Why is not included JFS on Anaconda?
>
At the moment there is a thread on "Desktop" what anaconda should do
for a workstation:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2014-February/009136.html
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:31:04 -0500
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I can't imagine having very obnoxious and prominents advertisements in
> the flagship applications that we install by default. But an
> application that is otherwise useful to our users should probably not
> be banned from the package un
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 20:14:06 -0800
Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
that in the wiki.
>
> (This is a particular pain point for me -- my main development box was
> originally installed as BIOS, and I switched it to UEFI, and I'm sure
> I did it wrong because the boot process is impressively finicky.)
>
H
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:50:59 +0100
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Frank Murphy [31/01/2014 11:22] :
> >
> > Personally, I know currently, most DEs' can be installed with yum
> > groupinstall. But, that may not always be the case.
>
> I'm going to go in the
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:53:17 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Personally, I know currently, most DEs' can be installed with yum
> > groupinstall. But, that may not always be the case.
>
> I haven't seen any indication that anyone wants that to change as part
> of .next.
I do sincerely hope you
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:34:17 +0100
Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Fedora isn't a Gnome OS, perhaps that's what they're trying to
> convey; making it one will most probably create less confusion but
> I'm sure it will also make us less relevant (my personal opinion).
Currently it's not, it is a default DE,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:20:18 -0500
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I've seen mails on this list recently where people proudly stated that
> they would continue to advertise one particular spin at conferences
> etc
The current product is not Gnome, it is Fedora.
And if asked about Xfce, which I solely u
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:03:48 -0500 (EST)
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> What this does reveal is a bigger problem: that the audiences of at
> least some of the spins are not aware of this relationship to the
> larger Fedora ecosystem. This would indicate that the "dropping" or
> de-promoting the spin
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:47:04 -0500
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On one hand, I am impressed by many spins as an excellent technology
> demonstration. On the other hand, what should existing users of a
> base Fedora do if they find an useful spin with a superior
> functionality? If its function is n
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:35:54 +0100
H. Guémar wrote:
> but they won't get coverage from
> marketing and ambassadors
Please don't include me in that,
I will always talk about
Fedora supplied Xfce to all who will listen.
and supply said media to those that ask, if I can.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.f
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:59:44 +0100
Johannes Lips wrote:
> Well, but it's not only about money and a lot of contributors use
> their spare time to contribute, so I wouldn't stress this money thing
> too much.
>
I didn't introduce the money angle,
just putting into Common language,
what has been
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:56 +0100
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Personally I always felt that this symbiotic relationship was a big
> part of
> > what made Fedora interesting.
>
> Yes, but please don't paint Red Hat bussiness goals as "Fedora
> community goals". There is some intersection, but not
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 05:40:40 -0500 (EST)
Christian Schaller wrote:
> The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else
> Red Hat needs for future versions of RHEL) are provided by Red Hat.
> So if you want the spins to the logically the same in terms of
> resources we should s
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:58:22 -0500
Josh Boyer wrote:
> I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
> they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large
> or small it might be. I also think they can be done by the people
> wishing to provide them withou
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:39:03 -0600
Jon wrote:
> Another aspect I worry about is the mirroring stuff.
> With the coming WGs I fear the rsync mirroring will grow very large,
> and spins are an attractive piece of fat to cut.
> Reducing size is something we worry about on the infra, rel-eng side
> o
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:03:08 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Well, one of the things we need to decide is whether we address Spins
> at all during the F21 timeframe. I suspect that QA will ask for a
> reprieve on that score.
>
By "Spins" do you mean
1: http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora#de
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:53:19 +0100
David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This might be a viewed as a fire torch, but there is, IMO, a major
> regression in BlueZ 5 which is shipped in Fedora 20. It doesn't
> support HSP/HFP headset profiles, which enables the microphone on
> many bluetooth h
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:15:35 +0100
drago01 wrote:
> So it happened .. how do we prevent it in the future? How did it pass
> testing?
Would a gui yumex\PK have burped at the update?
Would the two testers have seen the script errors.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
d
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:15:35 +0100
drago01 wrote:
> So it happened .. how do we prevent it in the future? How did it pass
> testing?
I don't think it got manually tested.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:23:42 -0500
Scott Schmit wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:47:37PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > > I replaced the typo scriplet -> scriptlet in several places in
> > > that page, including the anchor link. Don'
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:23:42 -0500
Scott Schmit wrote:
> The text of the announcement made sense, but the link doesn't point to
> anything -- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs exists, but
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#RPM_scriplets_fail_during_updates
> doesn't poi
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:19 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first $SUBJ is available at:
>
> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>
> It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse
> youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview.
>
Aside:
Listening to \v
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:22:52 +0100
Maros Zatko wrote:
> > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627699
> What can do users who doesn't want that gtk3 port?
> For some users reasoning that "it works better in gnome-shell" is
> just not enough.
>
I don't use Gnome, works fine in Xfce (F
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:16:52 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > You can also "after some research"
> > modify the dnf-makecache.service file
> > to change the frequency of makecache.
>
> It's a lot cleaner to just define a metadata expiry time in the
> repository config file.
Discovered aft
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
> Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
> official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
> better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins and so.
>
I have Xfce but is it ok to test it?
If it
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:38:39 +0100
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> No. This command is accepted (to my surprise). But it delete nothing.
> And just create new directory sturcture in '/var/cache/yum/x86_64/*'.
>
That does suck then
if someone with more that F20 cache needs to clean.
as Harald posted yo
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:09 +
Tom Hughes wrote:
> > You can also "after some research"
> > modify the dnf-makecache.service file
> > to change the frequency of makecache.
>
> I don't think that will help as that service simply controls when it
> considers updating - the expire_metadata set
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:51:27 +
Frank Murphy wrote:
> Where is this setting?
> besides metadata expire in *.repos.
> I couldn't find in on the wiki
Duh! man 8 dnf.conf,
so behaviour can be changed without running
dnf clean * && dnf update
for those that may wa
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:09 +
Tom Hughes wrote:
the expire_metadata setting still applies,
Where is this setting?
besides metadata expire in *.repos.
I couldn't find in on the wiki
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:53:53 +0100
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > to be certain you can do "dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all"
> > if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
>
> Not true if you ever used --releasev
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:30 -0500
"Garry T. Williams" wrote:
>
> sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing clean expire-cache
> sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade kernel\*
>
You can also "after some research"
modify the dnf-makecache.service file
to change the frequency of ma
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:36:38 +0100
Alec Leamas wrote:
> If you continue reading the thread you'll see what happened (short
> story: too late fo rme)
> --alec
>
>
Refreshing my email would have helped, too early for me :(
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:43:13 +0100
Alec Leamas wrote:
> First of all, this is not, and have never been a question of disabled
> repos. Or should not have. "yum clean all" refers to cleaning all
> metadata, not all repos. It only operates on one single repo, be it
> implicit (the default link) or
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 07:51:22 +0200
Ahmad Samir wrote:
> Right, I missed that bit.
> >
>
to be certain you can do "dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all"
if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:56:31 +0100
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
> Well, I can use dnf in it's current shape quite fine and it works
> faster than yum which I take as an improvement, so for me it's ok. So
> what now?
>
> --Jirka
>
>
Then add your voice to the bz to keep it as is.
___
Regards,
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:15:54 -0800
John Chludzinski wrote:
> 20 is the latest but 19 is the base code for RHEL 7. Assuming they're
> not too different, is there an advantage to going with 19 since it's
> what RHEL 7 is based on?
>
If your not installing RHEL on the laptop, does it make a diffe
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:28:59 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310
It seems the majority want the current dnf default [1] to be kept
Those who want to keep "running" kernel may nee
On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:56:04 -0500
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> * yum remove kernel vs dnf remove kernel difference (unfiled? )
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:37:23 +0100
Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Maybe this time you'll answer my question.
>
Read Vit's comment and my cli "command" suggestion to it!
you may get the answer, instead of looking for meanings' not required
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-January/
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:12:39 +0100
Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> I'm sorry for misunderstanding a command that didn't come with a
> single sentence.
>
>"dnf remove kernel --all"
>to remove "all"
What's to misunderstand
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:52:52 +0100
Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> I'm sorry I don't understand your answer.
>
> Dridi
>
>
I can't make it any simpler.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:16:16 +0100
Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > dnf remove kernel --all
>
> I assume you're suggestion that `dnf remove kernel` should only remove
> the latest kernel.
How do you make that out.
Have you ever used "yum remove kernel"
"dnf remove kernel --all"
to remove "all"
__
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 09:48:16 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 6.1.2014 23:26, Chris Murphy napsal(a):
> > Since "* remove kernel" appears to be inspecific, removing all
> > kernels isn't what I'd expect. It's not how mv or cp or anything
> > else would work.
> >
>
> So why not turn this around. In
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:38:46 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> If an expert says "no ordinary user" would ever do a command, they
> have not worked front line Tech Support recently enough.
>
User- can you replace my modem, it doesn't work
CSR: - can you do x,y,z .
User: - No none work.
CSR:
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:30:20 +0100
poma wrote:
> On 04.01.2014 21:09, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Because yum's code is a mess.
>
> curl -s http://www.textfiles.com/art/monkey.vt
> From Yum with Love.
>
>
> poma
>
>
I don't think that helps
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
dev
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 12:16:36 +0100
"Lars E. Pettersson" wrote:
> Ah, did not know that, if you try to auto complete yum only remove
> shows up, but erase also works. So perhaps erase was an afterthought,
> to mimic the rpm behavior. If rpm has erase, and yum also can use
> erase, perhaps erase is
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:33:43 -0500
"Jared K. Smith" wrote:
> That was my understand as well (as of about a year ago), but I don't
> know if that's still the current plan or not.
>
> --
> Jared Smith
Do you mean dnf will obsolete yum
In that "dnf will be called yum"
If so, can it be extended beyo
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:36:08 -0500
Steve Clark wrote:
> If is a drop in replacement for yum - then why not call it yum, then
> there is "no" learning curve.
>
It's not a d.i.r.:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-January/193312.html
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:17:28 +0100
Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:53:48AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > AFAIK (not sure), it should come somewhat easy once you the
> > > distribution is based upon systemd.
> >
> > That means it will exclude the most po
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:24:20 -0400
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
Will the other DE's still exist after "workstation"
Will a dev be able to use Xfce, Lxde as graphical choice.
What would encourage say an xubuntu dev //* devs are still users */
working on foo, to switch to "Fedora Wor
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:35:30 +0100
"Nicolas Mailhot" wrote:
> And if that is the case, there is a huge disconnect between GNOME
> goals and Fedora Workstation goals. GNOME speakers repeat all year
> round their software is not aimed at "power users", but developers
> are the über power user.
>
N
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:53:15 +0100
drago01 wrote:
> Depends on what you mean by "power user" (I hate this meaningless
> term) if it means "software developer" then
> yes. If it means "someone that spends his whole day in config
> dialogs" then no.
Maybe?
http://www.techterms.com/definition/poweru
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:21:23 +0100
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> The average user don't use nightly builds and should not be
> interested in such experimental software.
They do if they believe version N+, will fix\give
feature X that is nice to have.
and give feedback to upstream on use.
--
R
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:03:45 +0100
drago01 wrote:
> Apps shipping from upstream direcly does not have to be closed
> source. Firefox for instance could use that, or libreoffice, or
> eclipse. If a user needs a newer version (or nightly build) without
> having upstream worry about the specific dis
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 04:22:33 +
Frankie Onuonga wrote:
>
> I think this goes back to the concept of having something that we
> can do for ourselves.
It is a nice to have concept.
But Fedora users (even new ones) will use whatever "search engine"
they are comfortable\familiar with.
--
Regar
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 03:05:16 + (UTC)
Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Google is having more and more privacy issues lately. Why not use
> DuckDuckGo and write a 'bang' search for fedora sites?
> !fedora-guidelines, !fedora-package !fedora-wiki, etc.?
>
> --Ben
>
Couldn't care if they had a camera in me
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:59:33 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> /home/sandro/.local/bin in the PATH is not the default.
> Or is it new for Rawhide?
This in in F20 for me as user:
~$ echo $PATH
.../home/frank/.local/bin:/home/frank/bin
so the bit with the name seems to be branched at least
--
R
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:34:01 +0100
Nobrakal wrote:
> In my mind, Ambassadors are more near of users than developers or
> marketing team. Ambassadors organize all the events, submit new
> idea... It is really important to have at least an ambassador in WG
>
> Alexandre
It is also important to ha
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:31:28 +0400
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> - one for Erlang, and another one for Golang. Could please anyone
> help me - where should I start?
>
Open a ticket with fedora infra,
saying what you need.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Tickets
--
Regards,
Frank
www.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:03:28 -0400
"Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote:
> Okay, I'm okay with that. How about instead of a /etc/yum.repos.d/
> file if it's a /usr/share/doc/glusterfs.README containing
> instructions for how to use the community GlusterFS yum repo?
>
Are you allowed make a people repo?
ht
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:16:40 +0200
Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Thanks for replying- this slipped through my inbox. You can also
> > see > if your package was built successfully by visiting >
> > http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/stage4/http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/stage4/
> >
> Hm,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:04:27 +0100
Aaron Gray wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I need to get bug report from Dracut onto a USB Memory stick on F18
> that is not booting properly on latest F18 kernel. Usually the
> memory stick appears on /dev/sda but its not there on Dracut
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Aa
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:10:48 +0200
drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel J Walsh
> wrote:
> > Random crap from the internet not a good idea.
> > Since firefox can out and crab stuff to install, and I would
> > never no.
>
> No one is that insane ;) This is all about signed p
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:57:38 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Well, I think many folks won't like the extra disk space used.
More than likely, but if they are interested in testing maybe not.?
>
> I think it would take something like yum-plugin-local to have a
> proper repo that yum could see to
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:15:11 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> That sounds like it would be a lot of duplication in mirrormanager
> and other parts of the project. ;)
>
> kevin
Why not do it's on the users PC\Laptop. (As a change\feature?)
/etc/yum.repos.d/updates.repo (ditto testing if enabled)
keep
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:41:22 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This allows users to use the latest boot.iso or pxe images to
> install rawhide instances or point to rawhide as a install-able
> tree.
>
> kevin
Will this be possible through bfo ?
--
Regards,
Frank "When in doubt PANIC!"
I check fo
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:26:48 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 16.07.13 13:11, Frank Murphy (frankl...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> You do understand that this:
>
> > But -x is one of the good benefits.
> > Giving explanation.
>
> and this:
>
> > size
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:22:07 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > but as a test do:
> > echo | journalctl -x --no-pager --since-today | mailx -s "Today's
> > Journal" user (real isp email )
>
> What's the "echo |" supposed to do?
For some reason first few emails, without it had nothing.
Could b
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:53:56 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> Nobody is talking about removing from the distribution entirely
> and quite frankly administrators that complain about journal have
> not actually tried it and experienced the flexibility the journactl
> gives them it truly i
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:44:44 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: No Default Syslog =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog
>
> Change owner(s): Lennart Poettering ,
> Matthew Miller
>
> No longer install a traditional syslog service by default.
> (S
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:28:51 +0800
Christopher Meng wrote:
> And please fix the bug 963158
>
> Thanks!
Please let him take a breath!
--
Regards,
Frank "When in doubt PANIC!"
I check for new mail app. 20min
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:52:25 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> The tooling can not make split media. its not possible.
I meant us in Freemedia?
on our own pcs
--
Regards,
Frank "When in doubt PANIC!"
I check for new mail app. 20min
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:44:36 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> no, because pungi the tool that creates the source dvd doesnt
> support split media. I actually want to stop making source dvds all
> together. but that will need legal approval first. note we don't
> actually make and source dvds at
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:13:01 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
Apology for self-reply
Any further thoughts on this.
Can we split the SRPMS dvd ourselves over two?
Found something Boardy from 2008:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.advisory-board/4277
--
Regards,
Frank "Wh
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:42:22 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> (Our legal obligations may be discharged simply by the fact we keep
> the entire frozen tree, including SRPMs, for each release on the
> mirror, but that's an entirely different bikeshed and IANAL).
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-lice
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:45:25 +0200
drago01 wrote:
>
> Do people download / use the SRPM DVDs rather then just download the
> ones they are interested in?
https://fedoraproject.org/freemedia/FreeMedia-form.html
It's the downloading bit that can be the problem.
--
Regards,
Frank "When in dou
Freemedia Hat on.
Seeing the other thread where size limits have been spoken about:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-June/184345.html
Looking at:
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Fedora-18-source-DVD.torrent 8.8GB
Hazard a guess F19 will be similar.
It's pushed the limit of s
On Mon, 20 May 2013 20:20:56 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
The only MTA I've seen handlie both SMARTHOST and /etc/aliases
> correctly was "exim",. which is no longer included by default and
> for which the necessary configuration is not widely published nor
> in the default documentation.
>
ht
On Sun, 5 May 2013 14:45:17 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
Apology for self reply
> but repomanage seems to act on a named dir,
> as distinct from working on yum cachedir.
>
> Am uncertain as to use in culling all repos within keepcache=1
>
It may work as "repomanage -n /var/
On Sun, 05 May 2013 06:35:37 -0700
John Reiser wrote:
> > Asking was yum tidy-cache ever in Fedora?
> > http://freecode.com/projects/tidy-yum-cache-plugin
>
> How does that compare to "repomanage -o" from the yum-utils package?
> That's not a plugin, but it does say which are the obsoleted
> pac
Asking was yum tidy-cache ever in Fedora?
http://freecode.com/projects/tidy-yum-cache-plugin
No upstream activity since 2009:
Couldn't find any mention of it being so using
term "yum-tidy-cache"
--
Regards,
Frank - I check for new mail every 20min
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On Sun, 5 May 2013 09:38:10 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
Never mind
man nfs: sharecache / nosharecache
--
Regards,
Frank - I check for new mail every 20min
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Got an idea am working on.
Need to know if anything Fedora*ish
is using the word "sharecache" in any form.
I just don't know how to check everything.
Except ask here..
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux
> > environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that
> > work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open
> > source mp3 en/decoder.
>
> Name
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700
Richard Vickery wrote:
> For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't
> install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible
> to get this particular build working?
Important or otherwise, Fedora don't build in mp3 support
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:51:37 +0200
Thomas Moschny wrote:
;)
>
> Agreed in principle. On the other hand, all these possible solutions
> require something running on my side permanently :(
>
> -- Thomas
http://blogtrottr.com/about/
then use your email filters.
--
Regards,
Frank
http//www.frank
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 20:30:25 +0400
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> I can't find lightd, package in Fedora -
If it was lightdm package you were looking for,
repeat the test, but click "packages"
--
Regards,
Frank
http//www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:17:23 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> "Names of living people or well-known trademarks or goods will be
> rejected by Red Hat Legal."
>
why not on Rawhide do:
Release Name:
$^&*"'#~?@%
and any other characters that may
cause boot problems.
Hopefully there is no-one
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:33:24 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 07:16:27AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I don't think users would expect that install of dnf would
> > without asking (or control) automatically run dnf-makecache.
>
> Heh. That's one of the things I love a
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:52:30 +0100
"Nicolas Mailhot" wrote:
>
> Le Mar 12 mars 2013 13:30, Fabian Deutsch a écrit :
> > What about pulling the message stuff into plymouth and using
> > dracut to trigger a reboot which shows the grub menu? Something
> > along the lines: "Press ESC to see deatils
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:52:12 +
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Features/QXLKMSSupport =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/QXLKMSSupport
>
Looking forward to testing this in F19 guests.
--
Regards,
Frank
http//www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:56:17 +0800
Christopher Meng wrote:
> Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per
> release.
>
> Maybe this is the best solution.
No, it's not a Screensaver.
--
Regards,
Frank
http//www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:14:22 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
> Can't we simply re-organize the fedoraproject website in such way
> that the download button points to something similar to the current
> "More options" page, maybe with a small description for each
> desktop like "easy to use" / "feature ri
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:59:05 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/files/critical-path/old/critpath.py
>
> I've been using yum-local here, but it's not as handy as I thought
> it might be. ;(
>
> > modify yum-local to keep say 5 copies?
> > (in case something hits the fa
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:55:07 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> As some of you may know, I switched my laptop over to rawhide and
> have been posting a series of blogs about the various issues I have
> run into in the last month.
>
As a non-Dev, but running rawhide.
Hence reply here.
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
