> Hello. Gilboa, i would like to continue maintaining IceWM. And i interesting
> in 'springlobby' package. Please add me as co-maintainer. FAS: atim.
Hello,
Done. Please verify.
- Gilboa
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Due to the extreme time constraints that I'm forced to orphan most of my
> > remaining packages.
> > Namely icewm (which
Hello,
Due to the extreme time constraints that I'm forced to orphan most of my
remaining packages.
Namely icewm (which has an active co-maintainer), spring and springlobby.
Following the procedure in wiki [1], I should use Pagure to orphan both
packages.
However, the list of projects in the Pagur
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:04:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > It is possible that udevd is failing for whatever reason...
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 27.07.16 21:35, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I need help trying to debug a weird bug that I'm hitting.
>> I've got a server with fairly large storage (&g
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> It is possible that udevd is failing for whatever reason... but apart
> from the fact that some of the devices links are missing you don't
> provide any info. At the minimum: boot logs, and information which links
> are missin
Hello all,
I need help trying to debug a weird bug that I'm hitting.
I've got a server with fairly large storage (>100TB) that needs to
handle very-small-files.
Due to performance considerations I decided to split the large array
into 128 ext4 partitions (rather than use a single xfs partition).
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 16:35:39 +0200
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm trying to push a fresh build of spring.
>> Currently spring upstream is limited to x86_64 and i686.
>> The SPEC ha
Hello all,
I'm trying to push a fresh build of spring.
Currently spring upstream is limited to x86_64 and i686.
The SPEC has ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 (following a suggestion
from -devel ML), but never the less, its being sent to the ARM builder
and fails.
What am I doing wrong?
- Gilboa
--
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:02:34PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>> When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
>> I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below).
>> Whil
Hello all,
When trying to download my package source files from pkgs.fedoraproject.org
I'm getting self-signed SSL certificates (see details below).
While it's most likely a minor infrastructure issue, I'd suggest exercising
caution when downloading sources from pkgs.fedoraproject.org.
I've also s
Hello all,
I'm orphaning spring-install.
Up-stream is completely dead and currently its much easier to use the
(actively maintained) springlobby client to download maps, etc.
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedor
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:23:33 +0200
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring.
>> First and foremost, the spring.spec has "
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring.
>> First and foremost, the spring.spec has "ExcludeArch:
Hello all,
I'm facing a weird issue when trying to build a new version of spring.
First and foremost, the spring.spec has "ExcludeArch:ppc ppc64
%{arm}", which should exclude arm* and ppc* (both not supported by
upstream).
When trying to build F20, I got the following error:
Building spring-
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Just want to say I updated 2 machines using fedup, and everything seems to
> have
> gone perfectly.
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I second the above.
Thus f
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:51:15 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Can anyone help me make sense of the following broken-dep message?
> >
> > springlobby has broken depend
Hello all,
Can anyone help me make sense of the following broken-dep message?
springlobby has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On i386:
springlobby-0.169-2.fc20.i686 requires
bdb835272157f37cbb0067c02ab4fc437596ed.debug
springlobby-0.169-2.fc20.i686 requires
508df0cdc1c9e8
its crashed. Any idea on NFS related panic error
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Darin Vivekananad
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >&g
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Darin Vivekananad
wrote:
> Dell poweedge 2900
Its an old machine running a very old and unsupported version of Linux.
How frequent are these crashes? Once in while? every reboot?
As far as I remember, back in the day the bnx drivers was somewhat
short tempered -
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Darin Vivekananad
> wrote:
>>
>> Kernel Panic Error and got demsg and shows like this. Can any one tell any
>> issues with my machine
>>
>> Warning: dmesg info
&
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Darin Vivekananad
wrote:
>
> Kernel Panic Error and got demsg and shows like this. Can any one tell any
> issues with my machine
>
> Warning: dmesg info
> Linux version 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5smp (brewbuil...@hs20-bc2-2.build.redhat.com)
> (gcc version 4.1.1 20060525 (
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > spring-91.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
>
> Failed to build, but not my fault:
>
> /lib64/libIrrXML.so.1: undefined reference to
> `irr::core::LOCALE_DECIMAL_POINTS'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Everything else rebuilt fine.
>
Oh,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 21:07 -0600, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> > Oh my goodness. This is the highest amount of slippage I've seen in
> > quite some time. What is wrong with Fedora?
>
> The new anaconda UI and related features are more or
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Ben Rosser gmail.com> writes:
>
>> It seems to me that we should make the boot menu more consistent somehow. I
> feel like the simplest solution is just to run grub2-mkconfig at every kernel
> update, and stop using grubby for this. Then ev
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Apologies for spamming, "Sigh"
Thanks :)
You see? much better now. *
- Gilboa
* Apologies to the ML for wasting valuable bandwidth.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yes, I am planning for sure a f17 repo... and possibly a f16 side repo
> as well. ;)
>
> kevin
Thanks!
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 03/04/12 11:57, Thomas Spura wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Hence my reply.
*Sigh*
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 03/04/12 07:52, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
>>
>> Any chance of building a personal repository for F17 or better yet, F16?
>>
>> - Gilboa
>
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-Apri
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> greetings.
>
> Xfce 4.10pre1 is out... and I am going to look at landing it in rawhide
> in the next few days.
>
> Hopefully there won't be too much disruption caused by this (it's 17
> packages), just wanted to give rawhide Xfce users a head
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > We may have tracked this down to a new app server that only had 1 vcpu.
> > (It was thus getting bogged down and not processing as normal).
> > We have that app server all fixed up now.
>
Hello all,
Since 06:00 UTC time, I've been trying to get a new icewm build
(el5/6,fc15/16) out of the door and facing a barrage of uninformative
error codes, ranging from "500 Internal error", " build was not
tagged" to simple empty page.
In the end, I gave on on trying to push the 4 build tog
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 08.10.11 18:08, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
>> information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
>&
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Short question:
> > PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
> > According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>
>> I might be completely off target on this one, but assuming that the
>> information I've gathered thus far is correct, read: assuming that
>> wine *requires* PA 1.0 to work reliably, will it possible to push PA
>> 1.0 as a post installation u
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 08.10.11 15:43, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Short question:
>> PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
>
> It was released 12 days ago.
My mistake.
>
>>
Hello all,
Short question:
PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
layer that emulates the Windows sound system) more-or-less requires
current PA (1.0?) to work reliably. [1]
For now, sound is completely broken under wine on any of m
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:53 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=256138
>
> does this mean that F15 will get a rebased 2.6.40 sooner or
> later in stable repos to avoid troubles with the new versioning
> and will not stuck at 2.6.38 the whole life cycl
Hello all,
I've orphaned idesk.
Upstream is long dead and I'm currently do not have the necessary free
time to get it to work under Fedora 15.
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:25 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 11.6.2011 16:21, Gilboa Davara napsal(a):
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:25 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >> On 10/06/11 16:12, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >>
> >>> Richard W.M. Jones wro
> > 1. Easy setup of networking (bridged).
> Just to followup, to setup bridged net on kvm I need to reboot my server.
> That's a non-starter.
And long as you're will to do the hard work yourself, there's no need to
reboot your machine.
1. Create a bridge configuration for each target network
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:25 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 10/06/11 16:12, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >> They are available, but I think you have to build them yourself from
> >> source. All the information is here:
> >
> > 2. Make guest additions dead simp
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:48 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 29/05/11 11:24, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:06 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> /usr/bin/gpk-prefs
> >
> > As far as I can see, gpk-prefs only handles the gpk configur
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 11:06 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> /usr/bin/gpk-prefs
As far as I can see, gpk-prefs only handles the gpk configuration and
cannot be used as a alert icon.
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hello all,
I've upgrade my netbook from F14 to F15.
The netbook is running XFCE 4.8.
Previously, in F14, gpk-update-icon was responsible for display an alert
when updates are available.
As far as I can see, gpk-update-icon is no longer available in
gnome-packagekit and according to yum it's no lon
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 16:23 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 21.03.11 09:35, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 16:22:59 +0200,
> > Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > >
> > > My question is simple: Giv
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 19:01 +0100, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> 2011/3/25 Thomas Bendler
> [...]
>
> One remark, the error occured with the standard ixgbe module
> (2.0.62-k2), so I upgraded the module to the latest version
> (3.2.10-NAPI) but still have the sa
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 15:32 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I routinely encrypt all important partitions on my laptops /
> > workstations / servers using LUKS both at home and at work.
>
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 09:35 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 16:22:59 +0200,
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
> >
> > My question is simple: Given the fact that I rarely encrypt the root,
> > can I somehow delay the encrypted partition mount to right-be
Hello all,
I routinely encrypt all important partitions on my laptops /
workstations / servers using LUKS both at home and at work.
However, due to the above, I can no longer remotely reboot the machines
(at least the ones that doesn't have a serial console attached) as I'm
required to baby-sit th
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:07 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > I've read on
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
> > that mtune=atom. Just because I'm curious, why? :)
>
> Because everything that's not an Atom should be using x8
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 07:43 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:21:35PM +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:19 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > OK, I found spring-installer and unretired it as well. You should log
> > >
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:19 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> OK, I found spring-installer and unretired it as well. You should log
> into pkgdb and claim both packages as they're currently orphaned.
>
> - J<
Thanks!
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Hello all,
While the click-frenzy required to take ownership over spring and its
sub packages I mistakably retired spring-maps-default / devel and
spring-install / devel.
I tried to unretire them both, but failed.
Admins, help?
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
Hello all,
Following the nonresponsive package maintainers policy, a new version of
atop has been released a couple of months ago but never made it into
Fedora, bug report filed (+patch, [1]) 3 weeks ago.
Other open bug listed below. [2,3]
- Gilboa
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 00:01 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have packaged Xfce 4-8 pre 2 for Fedora 14 and Rawhide. You can find
> the packages at
>
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/cwickert/xfce-4.8/
>
> The repo is far from complete. ATM it is still rsyncing and Fedora
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 19:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 06:54 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
> > OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm
Hello all,
I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
(read: a >100MB download per release).
Is it bug or intended behavior?
If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing
non-security-fix
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:39 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> > Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and
> > possibly posted as an update? :)
> >
> > Would be wonderful!
> >
>
> Try this,
> http://kyle
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 23:51 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:26:18 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote
>
> > As you pointed out, different drives, can have more-or-less identical
> > partition size, with different CHS in the partition table.
>
>
ple drives. (Same drive, same
manufacturer, same batch, same day, etc)
As you pointed out, different drives, can have more-or-less identical
partition size, with different CHS in the partition table.
As I don't trust myself to use the -right- size every time (446 vs 512),
I simply assume the worse.
> Hello,
>
> I am doing the same setup, nice to see someone else with those
> requirements. actually without kickstart setting up softraid in
> anaconda was broken (try it manually without precreated partitions...
> it will drive you insane). out of the box booting didnt work when
> /boot was on a
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 18:18 +0100, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> The Ubuntu installer does let you use a NFS root for your installation source.
>
> On the point of needing something more complex, such as LVM or full disk
> encryption, that's what we offer our alternate CD installer (debian-installer)
> fo
>
> the other point of richards is what the whole fedora community and
> redhat should have to understand: "most users like ubuntu rather then
> fedora/redhat". why? because:
> -... better is what most user like. period.
Following your simplistic logic, we should mimic the Windows Vista/7 UAC
(E
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:09 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:39 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
> > Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks
> > ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a Boeing
> >
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM),
> and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed. It's
> starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky.
>
> Some of the things it does which are IMH
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 12:19 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 11:01 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:58:27AM +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
> >
> > > Long story short: There are situations where a grub menu is vital,
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 11:01 +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:58:27AM +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
>
> > Long story short: There are situations where a grub menu is vital, like
> > until you've successfully booted a new kernel.
>
> of course, and I do not think it is
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input?
> > >From whom it was gathered?
> > What was the question?
> > What was the answer?
> >
> > - Gilboa
> >
> >
>
> Most likely by reading or participating in the vario
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> > achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
> >
> What
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:38 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
> controller in F12 and F13?
>
> I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
> at least for (stock) F12.
>
> Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> If you think we should vote, go join debian. I think
> they do that there.
First, I never said we should 'vote'. I talked about community
involvement.
Second, if you are looking at the sure path to drive people away,
sending them to "go joi
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 22:11 +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > If we, as a -community- project, want to remain relevant, it is time to
> > decide who we are and what is our goal.
>
> Agreed. The who we are is eas
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 14:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 20:34:57 +0300,
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Thus far, it seemed that the both the user and the developer communities
> > were left out of these proceedings, and everything was more-or-less
&g
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 11:09 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm tempted to agree in practice with Matej that it is. I don't think we
> can kid ourselves that we're doing a particularly good job of making a
> desktop for end users; if we were, we wouldn't be being trashed by
> Ubuntu in this area (
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 23:11 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
> > Either we (package maintainers) are qualified to make sane decisions
> > about our package or we are not. I don't really see a middle ground
> >
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 23:21 +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > Before being added to updates, the package must receive a net karma of
> > +3 in Bodhi.
>
> [...]
>
> > It is the expectation of Fesco that the majority of updates shoul
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 14:18 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > I'm trying to debug an issue with 32bit application running on top of
> > x86_64 F12 installation. (Using multi-lib i686 RPMs)
> > However, debuginfo install doesn't seem to be abl
Hello all,
I'm trying to debug an issue with 32bit application running on top of
x86_64 F12 installation. (Using multi-lib i686 RPMs)
However, debuginfo install doesn't seem to be able to resolve i686
debuginfo.
$ debuginfo-install alsa-lib.i686 alsa-plugins-pulseaudio.i686
dbus-libs.i686 pulseau
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:51 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> gmrun-0.9.2-16.fc11 (build/make) gilboa
A fixed gmrun is already in F12 updates-testing and rawhide.
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
81 matches
Mail list logo
