Re: Package shipping their own CA and security

2013-02-08 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 08/02/2013 12:41, Michael Scherer a écrit : > Hi, > > a few days ago, the topic of package shipping their own ssl CA bundle > was discussed on irc with kiilerix, and the discussion prompted me to > add some code to rpmlint to warn people about it. In short, shipping a > private key, or a .pem is

Re: New packager: Do the reviewer and the sponsor have to be the same

2013-01-21 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 21/01/2013 16:30, Michael J Gruber a écrit : > I would like to help this poor soul get his package into Fedora: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249 > > (adobe-source-code-pro-fonts) > > I'm a packager but no sponsor, he's no packager (so needs a sponsor). > It's not clear to m

Re: How do I find the maintainers of a package ?

2012-10-23 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, There's also the alias -ow...@fedoraproject.org but i agree that opening a ticket would be more appropriate. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

2012-10-03 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 03/10/2012 20:23, Jon Ciesla a écrit : libgda -- Library for writing gnome database programs You probably meant compat-libgda which should be dropped (compat-libgda => 3.x, libgda => 4.x, libgda5 review has been waiting for a moment). % pkgdb-cli acl compat-libgda | awk '/Owner/ { print $3

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18

2012-07-31 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 31/07/2012 19:11, Bill Nottingham a écrit : Package libgtksourceviewmm (fails to build) retired, since nobody claimed it. Package nvi (orphan) Package torque (orphan) Both taken and co-maintainers are very welcome ! best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 10/07/2012 21:07, Michael Schwendt a écrit : > > Could you please respond to > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/python-feedparser > in particular the aging NEEDINFO query in #787401 that addresses you? > I'm looking that issue right now. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 10/07/2012 20:42, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > > Sorry about that -- it was easier for me to make these mass changes in the > database than through the pkgdb application so no notifications went out. > I know that the person who picked up the packages did so because he needed > them for things he

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012-07-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 10/07/2012 19:38, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > python-flask > python-werkzeug > > I actively maintain these two (i pushed Flask 0.8.1 last week, 0.9 will land rawhide soon) as a co-maintainer. As a matter of fact, I would have taken ownership if i had been notified that they were orphaned, but

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

2012-04-19 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Seems that some people unhappy with the "Beefy Miracle" are trying to make sure that we won't ever had any nice and fluffy codename. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: serious conflicts between python pks installed via yum vs pip

2012-02-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 10/02/2012 19:20, Neal Becker a écrit : > > Yes, but trying to be helpful to users is a fedora packaging/rpm issue. > Generally speaking, mixing RPM packages with native packages is not doing a favor to our users. I agree that some users may need more up-to-date modules, but isolated environme

Re: PHP 5.4 Fedora 17 feature - STATUS

2012-01-20 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 20/01/2012 19:51, Remi Collet a écrit : > Pending > ice (owner will take care of it) > Done, thanks for your help on ice-php ! best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: orphaning lxc

2012-01-14 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 14/01/2012 22:23, Thomas Moschny a écrit : > Hi Haïkel, > > I am comaintaining lxc for a while and was already working on an > update to 0.7.5 (but got distracted somehow...). > > Regards, > Thomas Since 0.7.5 has been released for few months, i assumed that nobody was a

Re: orphaning lxc

2012-01-14 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 14/01/2012 19:24, Adam Miller a écrit : > Hello all, > I am orphaning the lxc package as I no longer have a use for it > because I've switched to the libvirt lxc driver so I have been rather > neglectful of the lxc package. > > I'll release in pkgdb for anyone interested. > > Happy hacking,

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, > packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. > comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. > > The list of orphaned packag

Re: Regex replace help

2011-12-04 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le dim. 04 déc. 2011 15:01:16 CET, Richard Shaw a écrit : > > I think I see what you're doing here, but shouldn't a direct replace work? > > Thanks, > Richard AFAIK, CMake does not have multi-line regex, so it doesn't work. If you find a better trick, please share it :-] H. -- devel mailing li

Re: Regex replace help

2011-12-04 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 04/12/2011 00:07, Richard Shaw a écrit : > I'm writing my own cmake module for finding TinyXML and I'm trying to > extract the version from the header. > > For some reason it's matching the whole file no matter what I do. I've > looked through several of the cmake modules in > /usr/share/cmake/M

Re: Changing kernel API / Breaking VirtualBox - update criteria violation?

2011-11-22 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 22/11/2011 21:10, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > Because Oracle hasn't submitted it. Guesses as to their reasoning for > that mostly boil down to them no longer being able to ship the > userspace and driver code in a single "version" and make whatever > API/ABI changes they wish to between releases.

Re: Changing kernel API / Breaking VirtualBox - update criteria violation?

2011-11-21 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 21/11/2011 21:32, Till Maas a écrit : > Hi, > > a recent kernel update[0] broke Fedora's ability to be a VirtualBox > host, because asm/amd_iommu.h was removed. The removal of the file was > noticed during testing, but it seems nobody noticed that this affects > VirtualBox. Is this kind of chang

Re: gdbm license change

2011-11-14 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 14/11/2011 20:12, Iain Arnell a écrit : > > Also without reading the source, just the license tags, all of those > "Lessers" and "pluses" make most of them compatible. Even Perl's > "unholy" license (really (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) > and Copyright Only and MIT and Public Domai

Re: gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 and gnome-python2-gtkmozembed removed

2011-09-09 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le ven. 09 sept. 2011 18:40:34 CEST, Kalev Lember a écrit : > Hello, > > In order to make gnome-python2-extras build in F16+ and to clean up its > broken deps, I had to kill two of its subpackages. > > - gnome-python2-gtkhtml2: needs gtkhtml2 to build, which is already >retired in F16+. > - g

[deprecated package] ownership claim: libepc and xqilla

2011-08-04 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, Accordingly to our current deprecated packages process, i opened review request tickets on RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728403 (libepc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728407 (xqilla) Both should be easy reviews, if you're willing to review one of them, i pr

Re: [FHS] helper scripts location

2011-06-13 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 14/06/2011 00:26, Kevin Kofler a écrit : > Actually, libexec can be interpreted as being a libdir with the multilib > suffix "exec" (just like "64" is one), which is explicitly allowed by the > letter of the FHS as written (even if it might be against the spirit). > > IMHO, libexec is the one

Re: [FHS] helper scripts location

2011-06-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 10/06/2011 18:56, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > > I don't actually see this. Could you point me to the quote and section? > "/usr/libincludes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that are not intended to be executed directly by users or shell scripts." http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

2011-05-24 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 24/05/2011 22:26, Nicoleau Fabien a écrit : > Hi, > I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like > youtube, dailymotion, etc ... > > This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will > read the video as a stream. > > The default value in the configuratio

Re: Bugs in debuginfo packages

2011-02-24 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 25/02/2011 02:13, Ben Boeckel a écrit : > Haïkel Guémar wrote: >> %define _enable_debug_packages %{nil} >> %define debug_package %{nil} > > Is the first required now? Currently only the second is used. > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=

Re: Bugs in debuginfo packages

2011-02-24 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 25/02/2011 01:57, Ben Boeckel a écrit : > Karel Klic wrote: > > > Anything with ghc-* can be ignored; ghc does not have debuginfo in its > libraries. A list of other Haskell packages which don't fit the ghc-* > pattern can be gathered as well. > > --Ben > why not just disabling debuginfo g

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, i took ice since it is business critical, co-maintainers are *very* welcome. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packaging: LDC2

2011-01-21 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 21/01/2011 21:45, jonathan MERCIER a écrit : > Hi, > I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem: > LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime > and druntime for build need a compiler D2 as LDC2 > so how i could package this ? > > can i add druntime in same package as L

Re: Removing -fexceptions from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

2011-01-18 Thread Haïkel Guémar
hi, after a good night of sleep, i just noticed that *just* removing the -fexceptions flag won't change anything. -fexceptions is for C code linking to C++ code, but it's already default when compiling C++, then you have to use the -fno-exceptions flag instead if you really want to disable that fe

Re: Question regarding RPM packaging of interactive software.

2011-01-08 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 08/01/2011 17:31, susmit shannigrahi a écrit : > > For subsequent installations (if tried), it simply overwrites the > database. In this process, it asks the user whether to overwrite the > DB or not. This is plain stupid to overwrite the database by default, this MUST be fixed by upstream be

Re: vim + clipboard facilities : turned off? How does one enable them?

2010-11-27 Thread Haïkel Guémar
use vimx from package vim-X11 best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Ubuntu moving towards Wayland

2010-11-05 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 05/11/2010 03:10, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : > On 11/05/2010 06:41 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > > Considering that it was started by a Red Hat employee, I would say there > has already been some involvement > > Rahul Kristian does not work for Red Hat anymore but at Intel OSTC. Will Ubunt

Re: Is python-libs segfaulting behind mod_python for anyone in F-14?

2010-10-31 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, mod_python project is officially dead since june, it had no release since february 2007. You should move to mod_wsgi which a community supported alternative for python web applications. http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/06/modpython-project-is-now-officially.html http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/05/m

Re: A way to keep systemd running on F14?

2010-09-16 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 16/09/2010 11:00, Martin Sourada a écrit : > Forgive the probably dumb question, but why real_init? I was using > init=/sbin/upstart > back in the days when systemd was still badly broken... > Erm, i mixed up the setup of systemd for Gentoo and Fedora, the former uses genkernel instead of dra

Re: A way to keep systemd running on F14?

2010-09-16 Thread Haïkel Guémar
You can set the init process in grub.conf, just append to the kernel line the following: real_init=/bin/systemd I agree that systemd should remain a working option for F14 users (man, it rocks) and so there should a simple way to switch. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorap

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, pycairo has *14* co-maintainers, one of them should step up and take ownership. I took gconfmm26 (required by bakery and glom), glademm24 (bakery), as usual co-maintainers are welcome. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: Firefox 4 for Fedora 14?

2010-07-28 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 28/07/2010 12:45, Brandon Lozza a écrit : > > Mozilla's trademark requirements violate Freedom #2 > The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it > do what you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a > precondition for this. > > We're NOT allowed to make changes

Re: Add mercurial to development group?

2010-04-28 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 28/04/2010 21:41, Neal Becker a écrit : > > IMO, mercurial should have the same status as git. git is default. Should > we take a vote? > Then +1, mercurial is used by many major open source projects (mozilla, python, linuxTV, openjdk, netbeans, etc ...). btw, why rcs is default, who uses

Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

2010-03-13 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 13/03/2010 12:46, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > You actually want a different distribution, likely a Fedora LTS, not > current Fedora. > > Unfortunately, Fedora's leadership repeatedly had brushed off a Fedora > LTS as "unmaintainable" and redirected people to CentOS. > > Ralf Our primary miss

proven packager needed - mrpt

2010-03-06 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Following the previous thread on opencv: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-February/131584.html Almost all packages have been rebuilt against opencv-2.0.0-7 (thank you, guys !) except mrpt. We didn't get any news from mrpt only maintainer jlblanco and most packages have been pus

Re: opencv 2.0.0 soname change

2010-02-27 Thread Haïkel Guémar
No problem :) I'm not familiar with buildroot overrides (it requires rel-eng agreement, right ?), besides the unicap recent split has been thrown into the mix. Should we ask them to be include into the override request ? H. > > Added devel back to CC. > > Nice. > > Ok, no problem, was not eve

Re: opencv 2.0.0 soname change

2010-02-27 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Bad timing ===> unicap package (required by opencv) splitting for F-11+ Current unicap has been splitted into 3 new packages libunicap, libucil and libunicapgtk, no warnings, no meta-package provided for compatibility. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567109 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: opencv 2.0.0 soname change

2010-02-27 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 27/02/2010 16:28, Rakesh Pandit a écrit : > On 27 February 2010 20:24, Haïkel Guémar wrote: >> Branches affected: F-13 and devel >> >> >> Since OpenCV has deleted few weeks ago the autotools based build system, >> we will switch to cmake : >> https://

opencv 2.0.0 soname change

2010-02-27 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Branches affected: F-13 and devel Since OpenCV has deleted few weeks ago the autotools based build system, we will switch to cmake : https://code.ros.org/trac/opencv/changeset/2528 The main issue is that the two build system set two different sonames (2.0.0 for cmake, 4.0.0 for autotools). Open

Re: scythia-0.9.3-5.fc14

2010-02-24 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 25/02/2010 05:32, Kevin Kofler a écrit : > > PS: > Running application X built against Qt 4.5.x with Qt 4.6.x SHOULD work. > Running application X built against Qt 4.6.x with Qt 4.5.x WILL NOT work > (and this is why pushing apps built against a new Qt to stable BEFORE that > Qt gets pushed t

Re: urgent help needed with Miro rebuild failure blocking security update

2010-02-20 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Dan Walsh (libsepol maintainer) has fixed that issue (RHBZ #566441) two days ago, it's not yet on updates-testing repository. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1912?_csrf_token=b13c93d715d4f6fd04f59b03908b54d333d628ec H. Le 20/02/2010 08:32, Alex Lancaster a écrit : > Hi th

Re: Git 1.7 and git push?

2010-02-15 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 15/02/2010 17:37, Bruno Wolff III a écrit : > I saw that there is a change in the way git push works in 1.7. > Currently I only do simple things and a typical workflow is: > git pull > Make a few changes > git commit -a > git push > > This normally does a fast forward update and avoids a merge.

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 13/02/2010 01:45, Jesse Keating a écrit : > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name for this co

Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?

2010-01-30 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 30/01/2010 18:05, Paulo Cavalcanti a écrit : > It is not a pleasant situation when your code does not work because > the programming language does not do what it is supposed to. > > I am not raising any kind of rant here. I am just pointing that there is > a problem > that could have been alrea

Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?

2010-01-30 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 30/01/2010 14:29, Paulo Cavalcanti a écrit : > The first one is python. The GUI provided with python is called tkinter, > which is based on tk, which, in turn, is based on tcl. Since threads are > disabled in Fedora's tcl, > as a consequence, one cannot use python+tkinter+threads. > Tkinter is

Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2

2010-01-12 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 13/01/2010 02:07, Tom Lane a écrit : > > Why exactly is this a misuse, and not libxml2's bug to fix? There's > certainly nothing in their documentation suggesting that there's > such a requirement. > > regards, tom lane Afaik it does, i agree with Lennart that a warning

<    1   2   3