[389-devel] Re: Opportunist for Outreachy

2017-09-27 14:57 GMT+03:00 M.S. : > Hello everyone, > > I'm a research student pursuing my Masters in IIIT-Hyderabad. I am keen on > working on the 389 Directory Server project for Outreachy. > > I have prior experience in configuring, maintaining and managing systems > in

[389-devel] Re: Strategy proposal for making DB dump in LDIF format from dbscan

umption that the parentid index is readable as well. So we depend on two files instead of one for exporting the database. Does this matter or we don't care at all? Thanks. > Ludwig > > > On 08/17/2017 02:55 AM, William Brown wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 22:03 +0300, Il

[389-devel] Re: Strategy proposal for making DB dump in LDIF format from dbscan

2017-08-17 3:55 GMT+03:00 William Brown <wibr...@redhat.com>: > On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 22:03 +0300, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > > 2017-08-15 9:56 GMT+03:00 William Brown <wibr...@redhat.com>: > > > > > On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 17:49 +0300, Ilias

[389-devel] Re: Strategy proposal for making DB dump in LDIF format from dbscan

2017-08-15 9:56 GMT+03:00 William Brown <wibr...@redhat.com>: > On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 17:49 +0300, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > Following Ludwig's and Mark's suggestions on how to perform a database > dump > > in LDIF format from dbscan,

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 43 - Add dsconf support for Referential Integrity plugin

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/43 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/ae71d5937a1e1a81f334b3fd5325e2781c383e95886b0a00c3d34295b339fc44-0001-Issue-43-Add-support-for-Referential-Integrity-plugi.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 92 - display_attr() should return str not bytes in py3

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/92 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/fbf7fd8ed7bac76150bd05232868bfcc78faad19638b6b7954150e710e7be9a5-0001-Issue-92-display_attr-should-return-str-not-bytes-in.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Strategy proposal for making DB dump in LDIF format from dbscan

Hi everybody, Following Ludwig's and Mark's suggestions on how to perform a database dump in LDIF format from dbscan, I have come up with a strategy. I'm talking about ticket #47567: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/47567 I'd like to discuss this strategy and get some feedback. The general

[389-devel] Re: Trying to understand entryrdn.db

2017-08-04 16:03 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Krispenz <lkris...@redhat.com>: > > On 08/04/2017 02:08 PM, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > > Okay, now that I have read and understood dbscan's code, I have a few more > questions. > > 2017-08-03 10:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Krispenz <lkris.

[389-devel] Re: Trying to understand entryrdn.db

> > That said, whenever you write an entry you always have seen the parent and > could stack the dn with the parentid and createt the dn without using the > entryrdn index. > You even need not to keep track of all the entry rdsn/dns - only the ones > with children will be needed later, the

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 48185 - Remove referint-logchanges attr from referint's config

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48185 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/27b2c60aa523f307bf4b7e0f6e34ee448365c15a3efac3f843be21b4a58d268a-0001-Issue-48185-Remove-referint-logchanges-attr-from-ref.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] referint-logchanges does nothing

Hello, referint-logchanges attribute of referint plugin serves no purpose right now; it does absolutely nothing. I found out that this has been reported in the past as well: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48185 Do we know what it was supposed to do or what it used to do? Should we maybe

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49309 - syntax checking on referint's delay attr

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49309 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/63e4a85f884c3b84e217ff38d516e18be177c3dba4bb57d2f70e827b9a8ade59-0001-Issue-49309-syntax-checking-on-referint-s-delay-attr.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49329 - Descriptive error msg for USN cleanup task

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49329 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/22d1ad047ade37f1209125960c213eb9ec1e8acd061cc48832edc93389731697-0001-Issue-49329-Descriptive-error-msg-for-USN-cleanup-ta.patch Thanks, ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 49 - Add support for whoami plugin

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/49 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/2b435210f480d1f71b2dc0529e9ab570026d1a204417a94327e57f710768e471-0001-Issue-49-Add-support-for-whoami-plugin.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 48 - Add support for USN plugin

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/48 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/44349b844e78b688e9633a325cadf268328f2ad22737094a45244c0dcd168641-0001-Issue-48-Add-support-for-USN-plugin.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 78 - Add exists() method to DSLdapObject

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/78 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/c2b0f90d3cf280a4736a2f6e1a97a810734fa9b5119e1cb934ab642652e7282e-0001-Issue-78-Add-exists-method-to-DSLdapObject.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49315 - Log a warning whenever unauthenticated binds are enabled

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49315 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/c6f0c622a9bf124eab65e1b64d900bc5dac8fa36259e6cbcb0209e4a7a1ae3a8-0001-Issue-49315-Log-a-warning-whenever-unauthenticated-b.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 74 - Advice users to set referint-update-delay to 0

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/74 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/e8b0294326862b6eb3d3db0fa101f7e870f94523e7175a0340cccb18718227aa-0001-Issue-74-Advice-users-to-set-referint-update-delay-t.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49314 - Add untracked files to the .gitignore

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49314 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/5d54b17b9642779fd19d96e65d7f9af0c153eaaac62397c915288c47938e6ff4-0001-Issue-49314-Add-untracked-files-to-the-.gitignore.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Beginner's questions + referint-logfile missing

Hi all, I'm kind of a C newbie and I'm trying to take a crack at fixing some things on the C codebase of DS. I've got a few really entry-level questions that I'd like to ask. 1. How can I re-compile only a single file e.g. /ldap/servers/plugins/referint/referint.c? How about re-compiling all

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 31 - Allow complete removal of some memberOf attrs after #49284 fix

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/31 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/9ca21074d6979ee74b3b50dc13b25257ed1486b461997606cc28938372aa2231-0001-Issue-31-Allow-complete-removal-of-some-memberOf-att.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 31 - Add memberOf fix-up task

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/31 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/7d89dc172113d0fc6e7f5bfa436b53012055d3d71a5593eeb8b286bea9d93dcc-0001-Issue31-Add-memberOf-fix-up-task.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 31 - Add functionality tests and more for MemberOf plugin

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/31 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/d56ef441359485dc5628a1c3b45cf264b740cac154e9971f6c27fafde2f37b08-0001-Issue-31-Add-status-command-and-SkipNested-support-f.patch

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 31 - Initial MemberOf plugin support

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/31 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/ffe425b37463aafb5ba49efffa9dd4b0a3ffd2d45bf516f21aecee4360e79dfb-0001-Issue-31-Initial-MemberOf-plugin-support.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 31 - Initial MemberOf plugin support

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/31 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/1bd423d6be439dd1d5a1f5f15ea510f3db5966b83e78476cf327a925b9415dcd-0001-Issue-31-Initial-MemberOf-plugin-support.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[389-devel] [lib389] dsconf plugins support and cmd line design

Hello, I'm going to add support for the memberOf plugin into the dsconf tool. However, because this is going to be the first plugin to be configurable through lib389, design decisions will affect all future plugins to be supported. I'd like thoughts on which approach would be more convenient for

[389-devel] Please review: [lib389] Issue 23 - Use DirSrv.exists() instead of manually checking for instance's existence

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/23 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/188e95c5b473cf138a48a5f0e3946f69b13706dd02f5de128006493c031bc9f3-0001-Ticket-23-Use-DirSrv.exists-instead-of-manually-chec.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --