s/SOGo/Sources/
and SOPE from http://sope.opengroupware.org/ ? Which one should Fedora
provide?
Ref:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190217.html
for start of thread.
-jf
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:22:41PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 16.10.2013 18:13, Ja
I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job
because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
sope or something like that. Is that not the case?
For RHEL6 we're using sope 4.9 from SOGo
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:22:57AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>
> gpgv --homedir /tmp --keyring %{SOURCE2} --status-fd=1 %{SOURCE1}
> %{SOURCE0} | grep -q '^\[GNUPG:\] GOODSIG'
>
>
> That one-liner is pretty much all that's required for valid gpg verification.
>
> Hope this helps.
Yes
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:57:15PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > Not Found
> >
> > The requested URL /roller/blog/entry/enable_elliptical_curve_diffie_hellman
> > was not found on this server.
> >
> >> http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/26/4468050/facebook-follows-google-with-tough-encryption
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:07:29AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 08/24/2013 11:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
> >
> >looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining
> >which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these
> >days in conte
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:17:00AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some other
> distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named "MySQL", "MySQL-server",
> etc, which simply conflicted with the Red Hat-supplied packages named
> "mysql", "mysql-se
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> I'm curious - why would you need to do this? Seems somewhat fragile to
> be doing automatically on upgrade.
>
I want to make the upgrade between apache traffic server v3.0 and 3.2
as smooth as possible. There were a couple of state-files
I have an rpm package where I need to stop the running service, remove
some files and start the service again depending on which package
version was already installed. I assume I need to do this in %postun,
where we normally do condrestart, but I don't know how to check the
version of the previousl
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Puppet in the Fedora/EPEL ecosystem is a bit wonky currently.
>
> I'd really like to fix it.
>
> Problems:
> * Fedora 17 (and higher) ships with Ruby 1.9.x and Puppet 2.7.x. 2.7.x is not
> 100% compatible with 1.9.3. The number of issues
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ?
>
> I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in genera
I would like to upgrade Apache Traffic Server (ATS) from v3.0.x to new
stable branch v3.2.x. The 3.2 branch has lots of improvements for IPv6
and SSL that are important to me, and also fixes a crash I've been
hitting in v3.0. But, unfortunately there are a couple of incompatible
config file changes
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:39:07PM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >
> > It consists of 8 packages, and there are two more (seivot, for
> > benchmarking, and summain, for generating diff-able file
> > manifests) that I have not packaged yet, all eight are in Bugzilla,
> > in descending ord
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:15:38AM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
> wrote:
> > * If a git commit is tagged in a specific way, omit from rpm changelog.
> > What I mean by "tagged" is a git tag, in form of let's say
> > "silentXXX". Where XXX
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 07:47:25AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> Because we are trying to protect the logged in user, where we currently do not
> confine that many domains, and even if you are using confined users we do not
> prevent a confined user process from ptrace on another user process, s
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:35:09AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>
> I would like for a review swap for the following packages. They are
> sugar activities.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700
>
I'll have a go :-)
Could
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:43:10PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>
> So you say that both
>
> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
> IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=2001:840:0:11::30/64
>
> Shoudl work?
> (Have not tested yet, but might do that later today).
I believe
IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:06:36AM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
>
> There is - however - one option I am missing: Some form of combined
> static and dynamic configuration.
> IE. I want the server to obtain an IPv6-address dynamically, but i ALSO
> want it to have one (or more) static IP-address(es
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:37:10PM +0200, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722709
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710648
>
> I did a couple of reviews lately, but I would swap.
I've never don
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:20:51AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity I'am assuming this contains a daemon and if so has
> it been converted to native systemd service files?
Yes it contains a daemon, but no, I haven't created the systemd service
files yet. I intende
Could someone please help review the Apache Traffic Server:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463
I believe it should be more or less complete as far as I see it,
but the current reviewer doesn't have time to complete it so it's
been stalled for months now..
-jf
--
devel
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I have always filed a BZ against the 'setup' RPM asking for a
> static uid/gid pair to be allocated, and the changelogs support
> this approach:
Great, thanks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715266
-jf
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> You are misreading the PackageUserRegistry page. Or more likely, you haven't
> read it carefully enough to follow the link in the first sentence. RHEL
> doesn't use the 'fedora-usermgmt' feature. Not even Fedora uses it everywhe
We're trying to package "Apache Traffic Server" for fedora, and need a
dedicated uid/gid for user/group "ats" running this services since it
includes clustering and config management over more than one node.
I've found the PackageUserRegistry wiki page at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/P
commit 366067a4a1a5ec30bbe005af5044f748210bb77a
Merge: 8f85069 b4f33d3
Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust
Date: Mon Mar 28 23:52:44 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'f14' into el6
amavisd-new-2.6.4-stdout.patch | 21 +
amavisd-new.spec |7 ++-
2 fil
Summary of changes:
3dc31ae... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
e3f8081... dist-git conversion (*)
b4f33d3... 561389 patch from Sandro Janke - change stderr to stdout (*)
366067a... Merge branch 'f14' into el6
(*) This commit already existed in another branc
25 matches
Mail list logo
