On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:00:03 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
When's the last time this has been confirmed to work?
It always worked, for example for:
Fedora-16-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso
It crashes even with /usr/bin/X and xorg-x11-drv-vmware-11.0.3-13.fc17.x86_64
(not just in the installer):
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:43:23 +0100, Mark Bidewell wrote:
Last night I attempted an install of F17 Alpha on VMWare Fusion.
1) My first attempt was using the install DVD. I was redirected into a
text installer, I was not prompted to select packages. The resulting
install hard lock starting SSH
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:12:43 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
/usr/bin/kmk_sed: file
/builddir/build/BUILD/VirtualBox-4.1.8_OSE/src/VBox/Runtime/common/err/errmsg.sed
line 31: Unmatched [ or [^
kmk: ***
[/builddir/build/BUILD/VirtualBox-4.1.8_OSE/obj/obj/Runtime/errmsgdata.h]
Error 1
kmk: ***
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:03:44 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
The tested version (the one in rawhide) is iwhd-1.1,
while the latest is 1.2 (which is in F16). Shame on me
for not putting the latest also in rawhide.
If you never do a build in Rawhide - your latest build is the F16 one
- Rawhide
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:57:07 +0100, Neal Becker wrote:
How do I use fedpkg push with a non-default key? fedpkg push --help gives no
clue. I need to use id_rsa.fedora.pub.
Using in ~/.ssh/config:
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity
IdentityFile
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:32:01 +0100, David Howells wrote:
Thus the strip program used (from
the wrong binutils) appears to corrupt the binary.
rpmbuild uses eu-strip, not strip. Therefore elfutils, not binutils.
See: /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh
Regards,
Jan
--
devel mailing list
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:20:37 +0100, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
wrote:
rpmbuild uses eu-strip, not strip. Therefore elfutils, not binutils.
See: /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh
That's if debuginfo packages are enabled
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:15:24 +0100, David Howells wrote:
Interesting:
+ eu-strip -g
/data/cross-gcc/cross-gcc/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cross-gcc-4.6.2-1.fc16.1.x86_64/usr/lib64/gcc/powerpc64-linux-gnu/4.6.2/libgcov.a
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:22:20 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
F16 gdb doesn't support DW_OP_entry_value and typed DWARF stack extensions
I think, you need to wait for F17 for that.
These features are not yet in Rawhide, they are in FSF GDB HEAD, it should be
in Rawhide in a week or so.
I do not
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 02:26:44 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
(3) He is not going to wait for installation of new games to try them.
He wants to just click and run the game - like he does with Flash games,
immediately.
I have no problem running there:
yum --setopt
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 23:40:58 +0100, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Here is what my F14 laptop has:
http://people.xiph.org/~greg/packagekit.png
It can be configured to only show end-user graphical applications
That's not enough. I use my grandfather unaffected by prior MS-Windows
experience as a
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:20:56 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I already gave a reason why we should maintain these packages as RPM,
but unfortunately you have trimmed that part of my mail: There is no way
to install and manage extensions globally for all users on a computer.
There is also no
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:34:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'm not sure how we can make DPI magically be correct in gazillions of
broken displays' EDID.
If not blacklisting then whitelisting them, you have the community. This is
X.org's task, though.
Regards,
Jan
--
devel mailing list
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:33:13 +0200, drago01 wrote:
but the suspend does not work on desktop argument is simply not true
Not replying to metoo/flames but neither suspend nor hibernate worked reliably
for me through years on notebook (T60). Depending on BIOS and kernel versions
the former or
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:02:04 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
about the 'fedora' branch of upstream glibc.
GDB uses a similar style for the merged patchsets in the Archer repository:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gdb.git;a=blob_plain;f=gdb-archer.patch;hb=f16
Given that this
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:31:55 +0200, John Reiser wrote:
Anaconda requires 768MB, and more (=1GB) if there is no swap partition.
[...]
Use the installer that is available on a Live spin, instead of using
anaconda.
This reduces the memory requirements by 128MB:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
Various projects have been adding AM_SILENT_RULES from Automake to
their Makefiles for developer convenience; the goal being that they
see warnings more easily.
It is inconvenient as one can no longer easily reproduce the compilation for
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
the goal being that they see warnings more easily.
You should make -Werror default instead, by compiling packages without -Werror
various bugs creep in which would be much easier fixed before the compilation.
Regards,
Jan
--
devel
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:14:27 +0200, Adam Jackson wrote:
If you're volunteering to fix and/or paper over all the spurious
warnings gcc and glibc introduce with every phase of the moon, then
sure.
Yes, I do it for my component, GDB has -Werror default in development phases
upstream. It cleans
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:16:54 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Never, ever ship software with -Werror enabled.
I agree - for source distribution. Yes, GDB releases have -Werror turned off.
It's a development-only
option. You have no idea what gcc will decide is a warning in future, so
it's
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:39:55 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
Please reread the whole message; this passage only reasons why various
UPSTREAMS have chosen to use silent rules. The patch is all about
globally enabling the verbose mode, exactly the same you were proposing
in the kernel ticket.
OK,
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:45:15 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote:
If a package fails to build in a mass rebuild because -Werror was enabled
then that's additional work for several people to fix something that may not
have ever actually been broken.
99% of warnings will not lead to user visible bugs.
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:08:20 +0200, Amit Saha wrote:
0 Stray cats were added..
Was wondering what's the background?
/usr/share/doc/man-db-*/man-db-manual.*
Regards,
Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:22:53 +0200, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm trying to remotely download a package from a koji scratch build
but it doesn't work.
# curl -L -O
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3192896name=BackupPC-3.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
Scratch download links should be direct
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:19:23 +0200, Jared K. Smith wrote:
We were able to work through all the technical issues with the
proposal, and Release Engineering has created Multi-Desktop LiveDVD
images for Fedora 15. They even auto-detect whether you're on an i386
or x86_64 platform, but of course
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:16:41 +0200, John Reiser wrote:
1GB USB flash storage often can be scavenged for no monetary cost.
2GB USB flash storage more often costs real money.
I got my 2GB flash for free, I do not find this 1GB-2GB difference relevant,
the availability also differs according to
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:49:18 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
* It is still a new technology and only got a very limited amount
of testing [1]. It was not tested during the release cycle at
all but only last minute. Making it default would IMHO be to
risky.
It is
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 19:30:10 +0200, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
As for the subject at hand, -I- find VB a far inferior solution when it
comes to SMP and IO (disk/network) performance.
With the latest VB and the SATA controller I see faster performance in the
VM over bare hardware.
This is
On Sun, 01 May 2011 22:31:42 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Yes, all the packages which have WORKING support for SSE etc. in Fedora do
that. See e.g.
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/repository/revisions/master/entry/solid/solid/backends/shared/cpufeatures.cpp
On Mon, 02 May 2011 17:24:53 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
There is the STT_GNU_IFUNC feature implemented for it - the indirect is
handled by linker without an additional indirect overhead if applied for a
shared library function. For apps it works in a similar way
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:16:45 +0200, Jeff Garzik wrote:
While I don't care about accelerated X support, this hardware darned
well better continue working in an it works 2D display mode. VESA or
whatever is fine.
VESA is not fine, ancient Free drivers are debuggable code when something
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:09:36 +0200, Matthew Garrett wrote:
In any case, it's vital that VESA work given that it's the only
way to bring up hardware that's newer than the install image -
increasing its test coverage can only be a good thing.
It does not make sense to test VESA as we cannot
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:55:35 +0200, Karel Klíč wrote:
I have observed GDB displaying wrong source file lines when stepping through
a program several times, and I think such a check could discover some
issues.
Could you provide a reproducer? How it could be fixed by the package
maintainer?
If
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:22:48 +0200, gia...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to rebuild a package with an autotools based toolchain and
it's failing because they use -Werror and gcc 4.6 spits out few new
warnings on the code.
You should fix those erors and and submit them upstream.
Now, is it
Hi,
just tried -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections on F15 xulrunner and got
libxul.so 24947928 - 23631640 (5.28% gain) and it still works.
ld.gold --icf is a different optimization but that one requires gold.
Are there some serious Bugs why Fedora is not using it?
Thanks,
Jan
--
devel
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:06:09 +0100, Adam Jackson wrote:
For example, if I'm the X server, I have a bunch of symbols exported
from the binary that the drivers are expected to call, but that are
never called from the server itself. Does marking a function
__attribute__((visibility(default)))
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:07:51 +0100, Neal Becker wrote:
got removed, and a useless debuginfo replaced it.
The repositories are never in sync, it was tracked by:
Debug info RPMs do not require exact maching binary rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151598
with some
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
I have written a script which checks the completeness and correctness of the
debuginfo packages.
Thanks, it would be great to run it automatically like the `Broken deps'
checker.
Regarding the report below: it is interesting that
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:57:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On a more abstract level one may consider perl's META.yml-machinery to
be a package dependency tracking machinery of its own, in parallel to
rpm's dependency tracking machinery, with the essentially the same
issues, problems and
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:36:05 +0100, Panu Matilainen wrote:
A more likely candidate for new dependencies appearing is that rpm now
collects dependencies from perl's use base qw syntax, which older
versions did not.
filed now as:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679014
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:22:48 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On a second thought - May-be it would be more suitable for perl to parse
the *.pods, such XS-modules normally are accompanied with?
As discussed in
[Bug 679014] rpmbuild: Perl excessive auto-Requires
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:10:49 +0100, David Malcolm wrote:
Another gratuitous me too, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/RetraceServer
Detailed description:
[...] User sends the coredump [...]
Do you intend to make it default for Fedora?
So far I thought it is not acceptable
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:39:24 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 07:46 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I have trouble following what you're saying here. At what point does
one need to read the whole debuginfo file?
I'm referring to this:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:32:38 +0100, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 23:09 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
One has to give up on backporting new fixes to ever get any delivered.
That's not true. You can continue committing fixes and running builds
in Koji; just don't submit another
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:24:46 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
The packages have an automated test suite. I test the code
changes as applied the main branch. I test the final update RPMs
rebuilt locally my system.
Given all this testing, I'm not going to spend time testing the
particular
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:42:57 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I personally can say that the week-long delay significantly diminishes
my enjoyment of backporting patches into existing Fedora releases.
Being able to spend 30 minutes fixing a bug for an user and getting an
immediate feeling of
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:52:51 +0100, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
but I think it might be good to get a few
motivated maintainers for the fedora package.
Also think so.
Twinkle sound is choppy when using pulseaudio, the details are not important
here as I have not even filed it when the pulseaudio Bugs
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:52:02 +0100, Ray Strode wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Completed Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers there, got an
off-list reply but still no fix commit or commit rights approval.
Lennart is surely around...
I
Hello,
filed month+ ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643296
Simple fix of memory corruption affecting various applications incl. Firefox.
Completed Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers there, got an
off-list reply but still no fix commit or commit rights
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:57:19 +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
Dne 16.11.2010 11:04, Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a):
Le Lun 15 novembre 2010 23:51, Karel Klic a écrit :
Major advantage of the retrace server is that you can get a good
backtraces even from unfresh coredumps.
And why can't this be done
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:36:58 +0100, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
I have read some articles about the Cold Boot Attacks and I am
wondering whether my Fedora box is protected against such kinds of
attack, at least to some extent.
If you have physical access to the box there is no security left.
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:45:38 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote:
Sorry if this has been discussed, but has there every been discussion
of a dual 32/64-bit install media?
/usr/bin/mkbiarch is included in livecd-tools-034-2.fc14 upwards:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:53:09 +0200, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:48 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64 as the
preferred option on the relevant hardware?
i686 will run on x86_64 and i686 machines and on the overwhelming
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:58:05 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:40:22 -0700, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com
wrote:
Compiled code for minimum(), maximum(), etc. suffers from a compiler bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757-O1 wrong-code by
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:42:02 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic.
I find this
Hi,
Could Koji provide all the available versions of packages in a repository?
Even http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/ indexes only the latest
package versions there. Also f14 is not available there.
--
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:55:05 +0200, Trever L. Adams wrote:
Valgrind, gcc, abrt, etc. all seem to not get the symbols (debug info)
for the subpackages in my project with the subpackages. It was picking
them up in the main packages.
Is this normal?
gcc does not load debuginfo. abrt partially
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:06:13 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/17/2010 06:49 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
This is a good point, the users shouldn't really have to install
debuginfo for a one-off use. It would be better for a central server
or service to have access to all the debuginfo files
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:18:11 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/17/2010 05:57 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
5. Instead of hashes the missing debuginfo packages should be
listed with n-v-r, so people can install them manually.
This could be a problem. ABRT determines the required
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:19:29 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/18/2010 11:17 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Currently ABRT can at least run `rpm -qf MAIN_EXECUTABLE
ALL_GDB_INFO_SHARED_DISPLAYED LIBRARIES FILENAMES' and report these nvrs in
the Bugzilla bugreport before such build-id - nvr
301 - 360 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
