Re: How to handle nodejs bundling with native compiled modules ?

rst place, but worth mentioning in any case. --- If you decide to push on and try to tackle any issues with Node, I'll be more than happy to work with you on improvements. Just be aware that this might be a very Sisyphean effort. Best regards! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@

Re: RFC: Private installation location for NodeJS modules

ks flexible enough and should be compliant with FHS. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

RFC: Private installation location for NodeJS modules

ely possible I overlooked something important, and I would rather scrap the idea than commit to something broken. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

27;ve added anything new in the last month or so, I think I'm good. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

As the downstream maintainer of NodeJS, I want to express both thanks and deep understanding of your situation. Especially with the de-modularization effort, your work was always a godsend for us. Take care and good luck! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek

Major version update of reuse tool (3.0.2) incoming

hould land in rawhide sometime next week, and later also in F40 and F39. Let me know if that works for you or if I should change my plans. Have a nice weekend! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP sign

Re: Default NodeJS stream packages with versioned names are not available

; > I believe nodejs should provide nodejs20, the same way. Thanks for the suggestion, I did not think about provides at all when mulling over the problem. Kudos! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.

Re: Default NodeJS stream packages with versioned names are not available

ault) stream available. Probably really overkill if the provides works. > The overly-simplified answer here is mainly that there are too many > symlinks to maintain for this to be practical. Acknowledged; thanks for info. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: js

Default NodeJS stream packages with versioned names are not available

ones and contain only symlinks (/usr/bin/node → /usr/bin/node-20, /usr/lib/node_modules → /usr/lib/node_modules_20, etc.). Let me know what you think! Best regards, -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP sign

Re: Adding/creating wasi-libc++ into the wasi-libc package

e if that would work for him? Then we can decide what approach to take next. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: dlmalloc CC0 license (was Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc))

and not being successful; however, since at that time we were pivoting to use another malloc implementation, I did not push that very far (i.e. trying to find other e-mails than the one from changelog). -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc De

Review swap – wasi-libc

lling to take a review or two in exchange for helping me push this forward. Thanks in advance! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc)

a while :) I had a COPR of the WIP wasi-sdk, but I set it to expire automatically, so it is currently not available. I'll try to spin in back up today and send you a link, in case you want to start testing the Ruby stuff with it already. Have a nice day! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat

Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc)

wego.edu/pub/misc/> > > We can also ask Doug Lea if he can go back to the previous public domain > dedication. I've got some comments on the wasi-libc issue that another malloc might work as well. Nevertheless, I'll try to contact Doug Lea with the explanation and see where

Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc)

the libc with any other malloc implementation – any help or pointers appreciated. I've also opened an inquiry about this upstream [3]; we'll see how that goes. [3]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc/issues/319 -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@r

Re: Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc)

ired to go through the bureaucracy 🙂 Have a nice weekend! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

Packaging a cross-compilation environment (wasi-libc)

ompilation support in Fedora would also be appreciated :) Thanks in advance for any help! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Fedora ID and HTTPS

Kevin Fenzi writes: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:16:01AM -0800, Jan Staněk wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > tl;dr: Why is the Fedora ID server using HTTP communication by default? > > Fedora openid is using http because long ago when we started offerin

Fedora ID and HTTPS

real idea about how OpenID actually works, so link to the docs and "That's why" is considered a perfectly valid answer :) Preliminary thanks to anyone who takes the time to educate me on this! -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.

Re: [Sway] wlroots 0.15 update is coming to rawhide

Hi Aleksei, that's awesome news! Thanks for the continous work you do. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Orphaning python-bsddb3

As announced in the OP of this thread, I have now orphaned the package. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Orphaning python-bsddb3

nd to orphan it in a week or two, and your package will probably need changes. Best regards, -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.

Review swap: rust-clang-ast

that list is moderated and I do not know if anyone actually checks the queue :) If any Rust SIG members picks this one up, then I'm sorry for the double offer. -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Review swap: newsboat rust dependencies

Hi, Jerry James wrote: > I took them all. Thanks! Your OCaml packages should now be also reviewed, althoug Dan has beaten me to #1927441 :) -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signat

Review swap: newsboat rust dependencies

could begin. Thanks in advance to the brave soul(s) that are willing to pick this up :) [1]: https://newsboat.org -- Jan Staněk Software Engineer, Red Hat jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: Failure creating Fedora ID

Hello, I cannot help you with FAS, but if you could specify what problems do you have with the softwarecollections.org, I may be able to do something. Is this an issue with the website itself, or with a certain collections? Best regards, Jan -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer Red Hat

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (lot of nodejs deps will be retired next week)

On 29. 04. 19 18:44, Miro Hrončok wrote: > jstanek: nodejs-formatio, nodejs-sinon, nodejs-lolex, nodejs-util, > nodejs-samsam Claimed: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8317 -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek signatu

Re: Un-orphaned NodeJS packages upgrades in rawhide

hese issues to koschei. Only other option I can think of is going the Rust route (packages only in rawhide, anything depending on them must be a module), which I'm not a fan of. Best regards, -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com

Un-orphaned NodeJS packages upgrades in rawhide

-path-exists Keep in mind that the above list might expand in the near future, given the current situation with many nodejs-* orphans. -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers

ry* to keep them up to date with upstream; any bugs will likely go unfixed (unless included in upstream update, OFC). -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digita

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers

On 26. 04. 19 16:24, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote: > I'll take them. Already mine (announced in the js-jquery orphaning thread) ;) -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital s

Re: Orphaning js-jquery

have claimed the dependencies (all I could find): https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8309 The maintenance will be on best-effort basis, since I do not have any working knowledge of JavaScript. -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek

Re: sway SIG

thers, if there is interest? Good luck with the SIG process! [1]: "If nothing is going wrong, nothing needs to be said." -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek signature.asc Description: OpenPGP di

Re: I've orphaned spec2scl

I'm willing to take it over, as it may come handy for my work with SCLs in CentOS. Also I'm planning in the near future to play with it and see if there is any need for necromancy :) -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com I

Re: Review swap: newsboat

n the meantime, the review was done by ignatenkobrain -- thanks. -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel ma

Review swap: newsboat

]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677291 -- Jan Staněk Associate Software Engineer, Core Services Red Hat Czech jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Removing (or trying to) BerkeleyDB from Fedora

Hi guys, as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good - or at least trim down the list of packages dependent on it as much as possible.

BerkeleyDB 6 symbol versioning and associated problems

One of the planned parts of the F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 [1] is the introduction of downstream symbol versioning of both versions of the libraries (libdb with v6 and libdb5 with v5). This part is planned in order to not introduce bugs similar to [2]. However, if we introduce downstream

Re: F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6

Dne 24.4.2014 17:22, Jerry James napsal(a): > I need some advice on how to handle this for XEmacs, which is a GPLv3+ > package. Well, both GPLv3+ and AGPLv3+ have clause ([1], [2]) that allow code licensed under one of them link with code under the other one legally - only if you run the full pr

Re: F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6

Dne 23.4.2014 20:23, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a): > Hello, > 2014-04-11 13:18 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik : > >> = Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6 >> > > At the FESCo meeting, we were unclear what happens to packages that don't > get u

Re: F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6

Dne 16.4.2014 15:44, Petr Pisar napsal(a): > On 2014-04-11, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6 > [...] >> The BerkeleyDB, used between others by rpm [1], changed license between >> versions 5.* and 6.* to

Re: F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6

Dne 11.4.2014 16:59, Bill Nottingham napsal(a): > Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: >> == Scope == >> * Proposal owners: Create new set of packages and introduce proper >> versioning >> in order to not confuse the dynamic linker. > > Is this symbol versioning intended to be upstream?

Re: F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6

Dne 11.4.2014 14:57, Chris Adams napsal(a): > Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik said: >> Add BerkeleyDB v. 6, which changed license from previous releases (GPLv2+ to >> AGPLv3+), to Fedora while keeping the older version for packages which >> cannot >> use BerkeleyDB with the new license. > >

Re: F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6

Dne 11.4.2014 15:55, Florian Weimer napsal(a): > On 04/11/2014 01:18 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6 >> >> Change owner(s): Jan Staněk >> >> Add BerkeleyDB v.

Re: Packaging of libdb-6+

Dne 7.4.2014 17:47, Honza Horak napsal(a): > On 04/07/2014 05:31 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: ... snap ... >> Does libdb-6 have the same symbol names as libdb-5? If so, there's >> probably not a lot of packages that can be built with libdb-6 without >> the possibility of causing symbol conflicts with ot

Packaging of libdb-6+

Hello, as Oracle is unlikely to re-license the libdb6 back to GPL, I like to bring up the possibility of the libdb6 package. The idea is that the current libdb package would still provide the libdb-5+, which is still under GPL, and the new package would provide the newest, AGPL-ed libdb. I would l

Downstream .so versioning

Hi, What should one do if the SW he is trying to package produce only unversioned *.so files? I'm currently trying to package LMDB [1] as possible alternative for BerkeleyDB in Fedora, and the hand-written makefile produce only liblmdb.so. I'm trying to persuade the upstream to change it and star

Oracle considering DB6 license

Hello, some time back Oracle released new version of Berkeley DB under AGPL, which is incompatible with Fedora licensing politics. However, it turns out that Oracle might consider re-licensing it back: https://forums.oracle.com/message/11184885#11184885 If you are interested in DB6, consider