On Fri, Apr 8, 2022, 11:52 Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 11:47 AM Jared Dominguez wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 19:46 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/7/22 14:51, Jared Dominguez wrote:
> >> &g
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 19:46 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/7/22 14:51, Jared Dominguez wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:49 PM Samuel Sieb > <mailto:sam...@sieb.net>> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/7/22 08:02, Jared Dominguez wrote:
> > > This is a proposal.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022, 00:48 Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > The pull request to delete the code for BIOS support in lorax means
> > that we can't produce media with BIOS support at all once that's
> > merged. They've tied dropping syslinux to
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:49 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/7/22 08:02, Jared Dominguez wrote:
> > This is a proposal. Nothing has changed yet. The choice is now whether
> > to go forward with it or come together with a cohesive
> > alternative, including one of the two l
eard of cases where you cannot at all
disable secure boot.
> Thanks,
> Florian
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Jared Dominguez (he/him)
Software Engineering Manag
List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Jared Dominguez (he/him)
Software Engineering Manager
New Platform Technologies Enablement team
RHEL
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:36 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:03 AM Jared Dominguez wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 4:51 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On We
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 4:51 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 06 April 2022 at 21:35, Jared Dominguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 2:26 PM Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 6 2022 at 01:57:
edoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Jared Dominguez (he/him)
Software Engineering Manager
New Platform Technologies Enablement team
RHEL Workstation Engineering
___
devel mailin
in the bootloader space doesn't have capacity for
continuing support for legacy x86 boot anyway. We're attempting to
communicate boundaries and available commitment and work in the community
on a workable plan. This proposal includes a call for community assistance
if there's sufficient desire to maintain the st
ling list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> htt
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 7:39 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jared Dominguez wrote:
>
> > The security of UEFI systems is immeasurably better. Standardized
> firmware updates, support for modern secure TPMs, OS protection from
> firmware (SMM mitigati
email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 11:15 Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:54 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecateLegacyBIOS
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Make UEFI a hardware requirement for new Fedora installations on
> > platforms that support it (x86_64).
an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists
d, as is in Fedora 32 today (version
1.9.1 from December) doesn't have dptfxtract (nor do later versions bundle
it) and results in an improvement in thermal behavior on supported systems
without any thermal tables in /etc/thermald.
--
Jared Dominguez (he/him)
Laptop/Desktop Hardware Enablement
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:10 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 30.06.2020 17:57, Jared Dominguez wrote:
> > Something that needs to be cleared up here: thermald has existed for the
> > better part of a decade and long before dptfxtract
a thermald branch, we may
not need dptfxtract for any use cases soon.
--
Jared Dominguez (he/him)
Laptop/Desktop Hardware Enablement Manager
RHEL Workstation Engineering
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:25 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
> On 5/1/20 6:19 AM, Jared Dominguez wrote:
> > First post here for me too. I'm chiming in both as a newly minted Red
> > Hat guy and as a former Dell Linux person. :) I'm always a Li
First post here for me too. I'm chiming in both as a newly minted Red Hat
guy and as a former Dell Linux person. :) I'm always a Linux person though
and work with Mark as well as folks at other OEMs.
On Fri, May 1, 2020, 08:54 Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi Vitaly
> > From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
21 matches
Mail list logo
