On 01/19/2016 07:32 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm writing an article on 6 most popular email clients in Fedora for
> Fedora Magazine. For each client I'd like to have a quote from a Fedora
> contributor why he/she is using that particular client.
> I'm missing representatives of Alpine and
On 02/17/2015 02:19 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
There are some packages I don't use anymore, feel free to take them:
libntlm
python-durus
barry
spambayes
rblcheck
tokyocabinet
jaxodraw
flterm
libquvi
libquvi-scripts
quvi
python-django-socialregistration
dayplanner
gengetopt
On 01/20/2015 08:01 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi everybody,
Just heads up that Ruby 2.2 landed in Rawhide. We tried to rebuild every
package which depends on ruby-devel and libruby.so so most of you should
be fine already. Nevertheless, there are still some packages remaining,
usually due to
On 11/12/2014 08:30 AM, Corey Sheldon wrote:
figured out my issue ---systemd and luksCrypt related
Corey W Sheldon
Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Dimitris Glaros dimitrisgla...@gmail.com
On 11/12/2014 12:32 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 12.11.2014 19:12, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also using luksCrypt! So this is the crucial info! How did you
resolv your issue? Is there a quick fix for now and what needs to be
fixed in Fedora so that Fedora 21 has this issue
On 11/12/2014 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:59:16 +0100
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote:
Oh yes!
Accidentally, we didn't solve this earlier.
The plan, discussed with jomara was, Jason Rist (FAS: jrist) should
take over these packages (and probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/2014 10:23 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for this
package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
interested in
