ess-regdb upgrade effort need a Feature page (or
similar) in Fedora?
Since crda is a "critical path" component, what special considerations
need to be accommodated in order to replace it with wireless-regdb?
Thoughts?
John
--
John W. Linville“The worst pain...to have i
t I dont have to throw the hardware switch
> back and forth on the laptop to recover.
>
> If there is more debug info I can get someone, let me know
>
> Paul
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
wireless drivers have been ported to mac80211 yet
> <http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers>.
Yes, sadly, that is correct.
John
--
John W. LinvilleThe truth will set you free, but first it will
linvi...@redhat.com make you miserable. -- James A. G
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:39:26PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:27:45AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > If I correctly interpret the data from smolt (which reports pci ids
> > in decimal? really?), it looks like the pci id for the device in
> &g
mal? really?), it looks like the pci id for the device in
question is 10EC:8172. Unfortunately, none of the current rtlwifi
sub-drivers claim that ID.
So 2.6.38 will not support that device and 2.6.39 probably won't
either. :-(
John
--
John W. LinvilleThe truth will s
hardware he is using is increasingly uncommon.
John
--
John W. LinvilleThe truth will set you free, but first it will
linvi...@redhat.com make you miserable. -- James A. Garfield
___
devel-announce mail
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:13:25AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > IIRC they require a firmware blob that has a license that we cannot
> > &
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:49:46AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:09:58 -0400,
> "John W. Linville" wrote:
> >
> > AIUI, they main technical reason that they were finally willing to
> > open-up was that they were able to add some
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:39:48PM -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 10:13 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:31:44PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >>>IIRC they require a fi
sed to indemnify and defend
> Broadcom from all related third-party lawsuits. They fixed that though,
> and I merged it.
Nevertheless, everyone I know that has reviewed the newly released
driver code is being treated for eye cancer. I wouldn't expect to
see it in F-14.
John
--
John W
ting as soon as possible.
Thanks, Felix. I have created the update.
Since I created the problem for the b44 people in kernel -90, I
wanted to be sure to get some positive test reports before pushing
the -94 update. I apologize for the extended delay over the weekend!
John
--
John W. Linville
i&n=downloads.
>
> Just a heads up that iwl5150-firmware has been reviewed at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558550 and built for F11,
> F12 and Rawhide. Thanks John for putting the package together so
> quickly after my initial request!
Heh...sorry for not realizing we
12 matches
Mail list logo
