Thanks for maintaining Node.js for so long and sharing its history.
Jonny
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.
-1
I have some packages using the %autorelease packages and I do not like
that workflow at all.
For me the git commit history is intended for maintainers, while the
%changelog is intended for users. With the separation, then it is very
explicit, when mixing them, then I need to figure out if ther
Thanks for the tool, I have never found dnf repoquery to be user
friendly. I will keep it in mind next time I need to query the
repositories.
Very nice that you included man pages and tab completion!
Jonny
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
How much waste is it to recompile all the packages?
The whole proposal sounds like a big hack from beginning to the end.
Fragile setup with $PATH, complicated SPEC files, complicate the %build part.
In order to reduce build time that have not been quantified.
--
___
Hello fellow packagers,
I'd like to ask your help for a handful of reviews.
Most of them are Lua dependencies for the SILE Typesetter,
any help is appreciated.
I offer my help in exchange for reviews, I have experience with Java, Python,
Lua, C and C++ packages.
Best regards,
Jonny Heg
JavaScript library
Sincerely
Jonny Heggheim
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/electrum
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
Hi Nico.
On 07/04/2018 03:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Yeah, but since it's many thousands of packages, I think maybe you
> didn't have to send the whole list?
I like that he sent the whole list, then I can search for my username
and check if I am on the list.
> It's been useful for legibil
On 03/22/2018 08:51 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> It is sad to hear, but world rolls on.
> I would like to thank you. You have pushed fedora and java FX to
> completely new level. Without your will and endurance, there would be
> nothing of this.
>
> The Fedora+FX as you you are started it is a workin
Hi,
I do not have time maintaining openjfx, it would be better if is
maintained by someone that can give it more love than me.
Jonny
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On 02/13/2018 11:05 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Just a small heads up, BuildRoot tag is not needed since RHEL6 (which
> is oldest
> supported one nowadays, it's been year or so after EL5 retirement). And we
> don't support EL5 anymore, so...
>
> I wanted to send this heads up before I actually did
On 01/09/2018 10:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jonny Heggheim wrote:
>> I think the best solution, based on my knowledge and available time, is
>> to upgrade Fedora 26 to the latest upstream.
> So please do that then. The sooner, the better.
I agree, pushed updates to bodhi yest
Hi Kevin, thanks for your feedback.
On 01/09/2018 11:36 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> … if you can't do the backport in a reasonable time frame (This
> vulnerability is very critical, since it allows remote money stealing!), the
> recommendation is to just upgrade to the latest upstream immediately
that. Will make users confused.
Any better options?
See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4978426286 for
details
Sincerely Jonny Heggheim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel
Hi, I started playing with the pass[1] unix password manager and finally
found workflow that makes my Kerberos workflow scriptable :)
Here is an example:
$ klist
klist: Credentials cache keyring 'persistent:1000:1000' not found
$ pass show fedoraproject.org | head -n1 | kinit jo...@fedoraproject
On 11/02/2017 10:31 AM, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i just took the old patch from okhttp2 and port it to okhttp3.
Then it makes sense, looks like Platform.java was splitted into several
smaller files.
> Now i have updated okio to 1.13.0 on my local machine and took your patch.
>
> the compilat
On 11/01/2017 11:51 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I don't think much of expiring either. But keys for prior releases
> should simply be removed, as part of the upgrade process, or on the
> first boot after a successfull upgrade.
>
> Now, if we go this way, we have to make sure we don't turn a bad
>
On 11/01/2017 09:46 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> It looks like your patch is corrupting AndroidPlatform.java, how/why did
> you create it? Or did you port it from okhttp2?
I think this patch would work better
https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/okhttp-3.9.0-rm-android-stuff.patch
Another iss
Hi Martin!
On 11/01/2017 07:22 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.6.1:compile
> (default-compile) on project okhttp: Compilation failure: Compilation failure:
> [ERROR]
> /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/okhttp-parent-3.9.0/
> On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 21:54, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
> Also, reading
> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOp...
> it should build on ARM, but has this in spec:
> ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64
> without any comments or bug references.
> openjfx is packaged incorrectly, installing files into
> /usr/lib/jvm/openjfx/rt/lib is wrong.
This has been discussed before the review and during the package review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673#c76
It doesn't make much sense here. Guys elaborated it and came up with s
> Hi,
>
> I maintain JOSM and want to update it.
>
> JOSM now use JavaFX, which is available over openjfx package.
>
> But in openjfx package, there is a second step that needs to performed
> manually. These steps are described in
> /usr/share/doc/openjfx/README.fedora.
>
> These step create s
Hi Martin.
Martin Gansser:
> I am trying to compile MSearch, a program needed by Mediathekview.
> https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/MediathekView/MSearch.spec
>
> dependencies: openjfx, i compiled the src.rpm file from:
> https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/openjfx-8.0.152-3.b00.fc25.src.rpm
Tom Hughes:
> Yes there is:
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5224/17545224/build.log
>
> Looks like the source is missing - did you upload it to the lookaside
> cache?
Thanks, the sources file did not have the source tarball entry.
Jonny
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
or is there
something wrong with our infrastructure?
Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17545223
Sincerely Jonny Heggheim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list --
Hi Vít Ondruch:
> Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid
> certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to
> build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for example?
Will ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch help?
https://fedoraproject.
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugin-mpg123/
Typo:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mpg123/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ms Sanchez:
> Is it Fedora coming with MP3 decoders by default now? Does anyone has an
> official source for this?
Two MP3 packages just showed up in the package list:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gstreamer1-plugin-mpg123/
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms
On 25 October 2016 at 23:47, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
> On 25 October 2016 at 17:06, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>> That wouldn't really bother me, so I'm only curious, but why do you
>> find having a big changelog at the end of the file so annoying? It's at
>>
On 25 October 2016 at 17:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That wouldn't really bother me, so I'm only curious, but why do you
> find having a big changelog at the end of the file so annoying? It's at
> the end and you pretty much never have to look at it. Is it just
> because it tends to match searche
On 21 September 2016 at 13:38, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Are you in IRC? I may try to find you there and describe my system a
> little more.
No sorry, my schedule gives only time for async communication :(
Jonny
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro
I have not run into this issue on my T460s, using the latest BIOS on
Fedora 25. I can try to reproduce the error if you are able to give me
a more detailed walk-through.
Jonny Heggheim
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi Tobias.
On Jun 22, 2016 4:22 PM, wrote:
> Packaging
>
> I've found http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/intellij-idea.git/ - I
> guess I can base my work on the spec file there, which I'm currently trying
> to understand, update and build. I think the best option for me is to
Hi Rich.
On 9 June 2016 at 12:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I maintain a package which comes with some benchmarking tools. I
> would like to package these, but they have very generic names like
> "boot-benchmark", "analysis". Also the tools are very specialized --
> you would only want them
Hi Paul!
On 6 June 2016 at 16:53, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> paul@thinkpad:/tmp/test$ touch foo bar baz
> paul@thinkpad:/tmp/test$ touch "touch and go"
> paul@thinkpad:/tmp/test$ ls -l
> total 0
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 paul paul 0 Jun 6 11:48 bar
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 paul paul 0 Jun 6 11:48 baz
> -rw-rw-r--. 1
Hi Gil, your emails are being sent to the spam folder by Gmail, so it
might be that people don't see this message.
Jonny
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I have been running stable for an hour without the bug to appear, the
last thing I did was running dnf upgrade and do a reboot.
Here is a list of all the changes from dnf, I have a feeling it might
be the kernel upgrade that fixed it:
==
On 4 February 2016 at 17:22, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Which GPU is this with? How big are the displays you're using?
It is a Dell XPS 15 (2014 mod), with a single Intel display adapter.
The internal display is 15" and the external is 40+" something, both
full HD. The bug is always triggered on the in
Hi, my internal laptop screen turns on and off.
It happens both on Fedora 23 and Fedora rawhide. With Gnome 3 and
xmonad. The bug is triggered by most of the webpages. It have also
happend with other programs, but I have not been enabled to know what
triggerer the bug
It is hard to write a bug re
> % fedpkg update
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedpkg/cli.py:169: DeprecationWarning:
> Commands._hash_file is deprecated and will be removed eventually.
> Please use Commands.lookasidecache.hash_file instead.
> hash = self.cmd._hash_file('bodhi.template', 'sha1')
> Creating a new updat
Hi Jonathan!
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 22:28 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> You might consider contacting the Java special interest group:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java
>
> They have a mailing list and IRC channel, so you might find someone
> to review your packages there.
Thank
Jonny Heggheim
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 13 June 2015 at 16:41, gil wrote:
> wellcome!
> - gil
Thanks, I added a new package for review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231570
Jonny
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http:/
Hi!
My name is Jonny Heggheim, I work as a software developer at
http://www.vizrt.com where most of the code I write is deployed on
CentOS as RPM.
On my spare time I have a long term goal of getting MultiBit HD
https://beta.multibit.org/ packaged as a high quality package that end
up in the
43 matches
Mail list logo
