I added the option --no-backup-if-mismatch to _default_patch_flags in
/usr/lib/macros in rawhide (rpm-4.13.0-0.rc1.31.fc25). If you need another
behavior of the %patch spec file directive then you can redefine the macro
_default_patch_flags with desired flags in your spec file.
This change was req
Hi,
I want to just to inform you that the new version of rpmbuild
(rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc24) that is available in rawhide terminates build
when a wrong version format is used in spec i. e. epoch is not unsigned integer
or mutilple separators are used.
Example of wrong versions:
Requires: pac
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps since the version
0.6.9 too thus rich deps work also in hawkey and dnf if the version 0.6.9 or
a newer version of libsolv is installed.
Lubos
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent:
The current behavior is right. Your install script insert files into buildroot
and these files are not listed in %files section.
Correctly you should replace this:
%files
%doc AUTHORS COPYING NEWS README
...
with this:
%files
%{_pkgdocdir}/AUTHORS
%{_pkgdocdir}/COPYNIG
%{_pkgdocdir}/NEWS
%{_pkg
We fixed this problem in rawhide in rpm-4.12.90-2.fc24
Lubos
- Original Message -
> From: "Remi Collet"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2015 11:18:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] rpm-4.12.90 in rawhide
>
> Le 24/07/2015 15:49, Florian Festi a écrit :
> > T
Now, I see that, the answer is in the second link.
- Original Message -
> From: "Lubos Kardos"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 10:52:37 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 22: cannot use rpmsign in scrip
Petr, do you know if "--passphrase-fd" should still work? Because that is
the way how rpm pass passphrase to gpg and it doesn't seem to work.
Lubos
- Original Message -
> From: "Petr Pisar"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 9:57:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedor
