On 02/25/2014 04:45 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 08:28 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 04:17 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 08:14 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 03:46 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 07:42 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 0
ts of 389-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size (Rich Megginson)
2. Re: RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size (Ludwig Krispenz)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 10 Sep
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47521
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47521/0001-Ticket-47521-Complex-filter-in-a-search-request-doen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47591
I have two versions of a fix, one correcting the calls to
PL_strncasecmp, one replacing them by PL_strcasecmp, which I think is
safe in str2entry_fast.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47591/0001-Ticket-47591-v1-entries-with-empty-object
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47527
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47527/0001-Ticket-47527-Allow-referential-integrity-suffixes-to.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
-ldapmodify-operation-time.patch
On 04/19/2013 04:57 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/346
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/346/0001-Ticket-346-version-3-Slow-ldapmodify-operation-time-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/510
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/510/0001-Fix-for-ticket-510.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi,
why do you want to keep the old rw locks in ifdefs ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 11/15/2012 07:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/507
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/507/0001-Ticket-507-use-mutex-for-FrontendConfig-lock-instead.patch
--
389-devel
o "cn=user
two,dc=example,dc=com" would require to normalize the two cn parts by
applying the directory string match.
Regards,
Ludwig
On 11/29/2012 02:27 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 06:06 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hello,
i would like to get comments on
Hi,
On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that
the comparison
Hi Mark,
for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the
backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these are
better here ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 12/07/2012 05:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
https://fedorahosted.org
Hi,
On 12/07/2012 05:56 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Ludwig,
In Ticket 507, that change did not help after all, and will probably
be removed.
As far as I can tell, this is the only option we have for ticket 509.
yes, but the subject says lock free. So if we cannot make it lock free
is it
Ludwig
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
