Kernel 3.7 in Fedora 18

2012-12-27 Thread M . M .
Is kernel 3.7 expected to be available for Fedora 18? If so, can you estimate how long it will take? Thank you. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Kernel 3.7 in Fedora 18

2012-12-27 Thread M . M .
Thank you. 2012/12/27 Thorsten Leemhuis > On 27.12.2012 10:34, M.M. wrote: > > Is kernel 3.7 expected to be available for Fedora 18? > > If so, can you estimate how long it will take? > > Thank you. > > See http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/46002.html > Quoting one part: > > """ > > Fedora 18: […]

Packaging software compatible with only one Fedora release

2012-08-25 Thread M . M .
Hi everyone. I'm packaging some themes for GNOME Shell, which are compatible with only GNOME 3.4 (i.e. can be installed with success only on Fedora 17). What do you think is the best way to act? Can I submit the package to the F17 branch only, excluding everyone else (also master, i.e. F19)? Or is

Re: Packaging software compatible with only one Fedora release

2012-08-25 Thread M . M .
Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hello M.M., > > As soon as you request the git repo, you will automatically get the > devel (F19) branch. > You could do two things: > 1. Just make no builds for any other branches, then it won't get in there. > 2. Request rel-eng to block the package for the devel branch

Re: Packaging software compatible with only one Fedora release

2012-08-26 Thread M . M .
OK, I've untagged the packages "zukini", "zukitwo" and "zukiwi" from "f18-updates-candidate" and "f19" through "koji-untag-pkg -v --all f<18-updates-candidate/19> " (I couldn't untag them from "f18" since admin privileges are needed for that). When a version compatible with i.e. Fedora 18 or 19 is

Re: Packaging software compatible with only one Fedora release

2012-08-26 Thread M . M .
OK, thank you. Just another question. When I'll be updating those packages, what should I do? Should I push the changes only to the f17 branch on Git? Or should I push them to all branches anyway and only avoid requesting builds on Koji for the f18/f19 branches? 2012/8/26 Patrick Uiterwijk : > Dea

Re: Packaging software compatible with only one Fedora release

2012-08-27 Thread M . M .
OK, here is the ticket I filed to rel-eng: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5307 Now, I'm unsure on how to deal with the branch "master": should I keep it up-to-date even if it's related to Fedora 19? Or, instead, when updating the package, should I update only the branch "f17", excluding e

Unblocking packages: new review needed?

2012-11-07 Thread M . M .
I have requested Release Engineering to unblock some packages, which previously had been blocked on some branches: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5387 I have been told that those packages must be reviewed again in order to be unblocked. I'm not 100% sure of what to do. Do I have to open a

Unblocking packages: new review needed?

2012-11-08 Thread M . M .
OK, thanks for your answers. I've submitted a new request for each package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874718 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874719 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874721 Regards, M.M. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht