WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (14:00 London, 15:00 Brno, 9:00 Boston,
22:00 Tokyo) in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
= Topic =
* how hhorak's idea about summary from each WG worked
* epel/epic proposal - chat with smoodge
* OpenFloor
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in
Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in
Fedora yet.
The whole statement can be found here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document
There is missing Atomic and/or Docke
There's not much to discuss. I'd like to cancel tomorrow's meeting.
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2014-05-20)
==
Meeting started by mmaslano at 15:03:40 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2014-05-20/env-and-stacks.2014
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2013-11-05)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 16:02:38 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-05/environment_and_stacks.2013
My apologies for the last minute agenda. We'll be holding our initial
WG meeting today at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode. We'll
cover the various items below. I will try and keep the meeting under
1 hour.
== Logistics ==
- communication channels
- mailing list(s) - env-and-stacks
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-10-09)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-10-09/fesco.2013-10-09-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 19:00 CET) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #986 F19 Feature: DualstackN
- Original Message -
> From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:50:48 AM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:56:04PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time,
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Miller"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:21:01 AM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > this proposal was rec
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:32:35 AM
> Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
>
> On 11/28/2012 08:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Hello,
> > this proposal was recently linked in v
- Original Message -
> From: "Orion Poplawski"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , yum-ow...@fedoraproject.org,
> yum-cron-ow...@fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:47:19 PM
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20121128 changes
>
> On 11/28/2012 06:32 AM
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-11-14)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-11-14/fesco.2012-11-14-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-07-30)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 17:00:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-07-30/fesco.2012-07-30-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= New business =
#topic #911 F18 Feature: Samba 4.0 -
https://
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Kratochvil"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:35:19 AM
> Subject: Re: redhat-rpm-config and rpm-build (fwd)
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:03:59 +0200, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > Well I tend to agree: it wo
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:57:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...
>
> On 11/22/2011 09:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 11/22/2011 04:51 AM, "J
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Howarth"
> To: "Fedora perl development team"
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:41:37 PM
> Subject: Re: News from rebuild
> On 06/24/2011 02:41 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> > 2011/6/24 Marcela Mašláňová:
> >>
> >> Another thing are filters. I suppose it isn'
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
mass rebuild.
dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created
one big update, so please don't file your own updates into bodhi.
List of all dependent packages:
repoquery --whatrequires 'li
- Original Message -
> From: "Nathanael D. Noblet"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:24:36 PM
> Subject: Re: libmysqlclient soname version bumped by upstream
> On 03/23/2011 08:03 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On 23/03/11 13:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Ja
- Original Message -
> From: "Robin 'cheese' Lee"
> To: perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:21:50 AM
> Subject: Manipulate Dev. release number properly
> Hi!
>
> RPM doen't generate proper version numbers for Dev. releases of
> modules. For
> exampl
- Original Message -
> From: "Bruno Wolff III"
> To: "Ralf Corsepius"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Tom Callaway"
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 6:51:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 18:3
- Original Message -
> From: "Ralf Corsepius"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:44:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
> On 02/16/2011 10:55 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Marcela Mašláňová
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Howarth"
> To: "Peter Robinson"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:43:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
> On 16/02/11 09:39, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kofler"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:55:26 AM
> Subject: Re: Procedure to push a package causing broken deps to f15?
> Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> > I completely agree.
> >
> > At least nag-mails about the
- "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" wrote:
> The Fedora Packaging Committee has an open seat. Are you interested
> in
> helping to decide the packaging standards and guidelines for Fedora?
> Are
> you familiar with the inner workings of RPM and its spec file magic?
> Do
> you make the wiki cry? Does t
- "Ralf Corsepius" wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 04:08 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > This is list of failed packages against dist-f14-perltest on
> 2010-05-14.
>
>
> Comments on some packages I had a look into interspersed:
>
> > perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
> rebuilt
>
> > perl-AutoClass
> false ne
Hello,
I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
perl-Acme-PlayCode
perl-Apache2-SOAP
perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
perl-Archive-RPM
perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope
perl-Calendar-Simple
perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView
perl-Catalyst-Authenti
Hello,
rpm automagically add some other requirements from your rpm, but
in this case I'm not sure from where. Also I didn't find
the correct 'indent' on cpan.
You can upload your srpm on web and ask on perl-devel list for help.
Maybe someone would know what's wrong with this package.
Best regard
- "Paul Howarth" wrote:
> On 16/03/10 16:33, Iain Arnell wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Marcela
> Maslanova wrote:
> >> - "Iain Arnell" wrote:
> >>> I
> >>> guess perl.spec needs a little more work up fron
- "Iain Arnell" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Marcela Maslanova
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I've decided fix my build failure of IO::Compress::* (#555420)
> > by updating to the latest version, which passed on my testing F-13.
> > P
- "Marcela Maslanova" wrote:
> - "Iain Arnell" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Paul Howarth
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:33:31 +0100
> > > Iain Arnell wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at
In perl we have to often update package to fix one thing, but
this update needs higher version of different package, so we
are forced to update package even in older releases.
Chris and Ralf explained our reasons well in previous posts.
There are more worthless updates, so you should send some gen
Hello,
I'd like to ask on your opinion on dual lived modules in
our distro. I knew that Mandriva has the main perl package
and also provide rpms of sub-packages, which are easier to
update. They are using patch that allows them override the
core modules. Also debian has perl core and sub-packages
a
- "Josh Boyer" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 08:14:13AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> >
> >- "Matthias Clasen" wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>
> >> I think ban
- "Matthias Clasen" wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> I think banning stable pushes is the right idea. None of your reasons
> is
> very convincing.
>
My packages are rarely tested and I forget them in testing phase for a
long time. Also fixing BR don't nee
36 matches
Mail list logo
