[389-devel] please review ticket #308 - Automembership plugin deadlocks if data and config area mixed in the plugin configuration

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/308 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/308/0001-Ticket-308-Automembership-plugin-fails-if-data-and-c.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review ticket 292 - logconv.pl shows the incorrect search base and scope

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/292 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/292/0001-Ticket-292-logconv.pl-reporting-unindexed-search-wit.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review ticket #191 - Implement SO_KEEPALIVE on network calls

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/191 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/191/0001-Ticket-191-Implement-SO_KEEPALIVE-in-network-calls.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Revised: please review ticket #305 - Certain CMP operations hang or cause ns-slapd to crash

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/305 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/305/0001-Ticket-305-Certain-CMP-operations-hang-or-cause-ns-s.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-d

[389-devel] please review ticket #305 - Certain CMP operations hang or cause ns-slapd to crash

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/305 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/305/0001-Ticket-305-Certain-CMP-operations-hang-or-cause-ns-s.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review ticket #291 - cannot use & in sasl search filter mappings

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/291 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/291/0001-Ticket-291-cannot-use-in-a-sasl-map-search-filter.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review ticket #74 - Create schema for DNA plugin - revised Makefile changes

Revised the Makefile changes(didn't run autogen previously) Original Message Subject: [389-devel] please review ticket #74 - Create schema for DNA plugin Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:05:57 -0500 From: Mark Reynolds Reply-To: 389 Directory server developer discu

[389-devel] Revision #2: please review ticket #211 - dnaNextValue gets incremented even if the user addition fails

Another revision https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/0001-Ticket-211-dnaNextValue-gets-incremented-even-if-the.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/ On 02/24/2012 12:31 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: Revised: https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211

[389-devel] Revised: please review ticket #211 - dnaNextValue gets incremented even if the user addition fails

Revised: https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/0001-Ticket-211-dnaNextValue-gets-incremented-even-if-the.2.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/ On 02/23/2012 02:35 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: Original Message Subject: [389-devel] please

[389-devel] resent: please review ticket #211 - dnaNextValue gets incremented even if the user addition fails

Original Message Subject: [389-devel] please review ticket #211 - dnaNextValue gets incremented even if the user addition fails Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:32:52 -0500 From: Mark Reynolds Reply-To: 389 Directory server developer discussion. <389

Re: [389-devel] Please review: coverity 12559 Uninitialized pointer read

ack On 02/22/2012 11:21 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review ticket #211 - dnaNextValue gets incremented even if the user addition fails

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/ https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/0001-Ticket-211-dnaNextValue-gets-incremented-even-if-the.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review ticket #111 - ability to control behavior of modifyTimestamp/modifiersNa

Revised fix based on Rich's comments https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/111 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/111/0001-Ticket-111-ability-to-control-behavior-of-modifyTime.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: [389-devel] please review ticket #129 - Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops

Actually after looking at ticket #111, I think maybe we should add this flag to memberOf, referint, and maybe some other plugins. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Mark On 02/07/2012 04:23 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/129 https://fedorahosted.org/389

Re: [389-devel] please review ticket #129 - Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops

I had a typo in part of the fix, but... After looking at ticket #111, I think maybe we should add this flag to memberOf, referint, and maybe some other plugins. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Mark PS - having email issues again, so this is a duplicate On 02/07/2012 04:28 PM, Mark Reynolds

Re: [389-devel] please review ticket #129 - Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops

know if the the first two emails will actually go through. - Original Message - From: "Mark Reynolds" To: "389 Directory server developer discussion." <389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 4:23:52 PM Subject: [389-devel] please r

[389-devel] please review ticket #129 - Should only update modifyTimestamp/modifiersName on MODIFY ops

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/129 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/129/0001-Ticket-129-Should-only-update-modifyTimestamp-modifi.patch This issue was previously fixed, I just expanded the fix a little. Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedorap

[389-devel] please review ticket#17 - additional optimizations for replicated ops - updated link

Sorry had the wrong link to the patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17/0001-Ticket-17-new-replication-optimizations.patch On 02/07/2012 03:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17/0001

[389-devel] please review ticket#17 - additional optimizations for replicated ops

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17/0001-Ticket-17-replication-optimizations.patch Found a few more minor optimizations. Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: [389-devel] New Support Tool: dseconv.pl (dse.ldif file parser)

*.ldif and if they are not found in the templates just failover to the hardcoded values? It will save some time on the script maintenance when the default values are changed and/or added in the templates. @+ 2012/2/6 Mark Reynolds mailto:marey...@redhat.com>> Hi All, This was a

[389-devel] please review ticket #17 - Replication optimizations around adds and modifies

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/17 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17/0001-Ticket-17-Replication-optimizations.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] New Support Tool: dseconv.pl (dse.ldif file parser)

Hi All, This was a side project of mine for some time, and I just ported it to DS 389. It basically parses the dse.ldif into a readable format. It groups all the backend info together. So each backend lists its own indexes, config, replication info, etc. It checks for non default config s

[389-devel] please review ticket #175 - logconv.pl improvements

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175/0001-Ticket-175-logconv.pl-improvements.patch Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review ticket #175 - logconv.pl improvements (2)

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175/0001-Ticket-175-logconv.pl-improvements.patch There might be another duplicate email coming through. Having mail server issues(again)... Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.

Re: [389-devel] PAM plugin vs post op processing. New return code proposal...

On 02/01/2012 04:28 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/01/2012 02:16 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: Hi Everyone, There is an issue with the PAM plugin, that when it performs a successful bind we actually return error 1 to plugins_call_func(), which essentially causes the abort of the all plugin

Re: [389-devel] Please review: fix a couple of minor coverity issues

On 02/01/2012 01:56 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel ack -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] please review ticket 55 - Limit of 1024 chars in nsMatchingRule

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/55 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/55/0001-Ticket-55-Limit-of-1024-characters-for-nsMatchingRul.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[389-devel] Please review fix for ticket#71 - unable to delete managed entry config

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/71 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/71/0001-Ticket-71-Unable-to-delete-managed-entry-config.patch Thanks in advance, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

<    1   2