I still missed some tabs, revised patch attached
On 03/08/2012 04:28 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
While working on ticket 271, I found that the code was almost
unreadable in repl5_inc_run(). The tabs and spacing were all over the
place. So wanted to get this code cleanup checked in before I
Config needs to ignore the new attributes...
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/302
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/302/0001-Config-changes-fail-because-of-unknown-attribute-int.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/191
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/191/0001-Ticket-191-Implement-SO_KEEPALIVE-in-network-calls.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/305
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/305/0001-Ticket-305-Certain-CMP-operations-hang-or-cause-ns-s.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/305
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/305/0001-Ticket-305-Certain-CMP-operations-hang-or-cause-ns-s.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
Hi Everyone,
I figured I'd send this out since we are looking to possibly add proxy
functionality to DS down the road. This came about because someone
asked if there was a way to convert gmt timestamps to local time.
Things like passwordexpiretime, modifierstimestamp, etc. A postop
plugin
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/291
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/291/0001-Ticket-291-cannot-use-in-a-sasl-map-search-filter.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Revised the Makefile changes(didn't run autogen previously)
Original Message
Subject: [389-devel] please review ticket #74 - Create schema for DNA
plugin
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:05:57 -0500
From: Mark Reynolds marey...@redhat.com
Reply-To: 389 Directory server
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/74
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/74/0001-Ticket-74-Add-schema-for-DNA-plugin-RFE.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Revised:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/0001-Ticket-211-dnaNextValue-gets-incremented-even-if-the.2.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/
On 02/23/2012 02:35 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [389-devel] please
Another revision
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/0001-Ticket-211-dnaNextValue-gets-incremented-even-if-the.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/
On 02/24/2012 12:31 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Revised:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211
Original Message
Subject: [389-devel] please review ticket #211 - dnaNextValue gets
incremented even if the user addition fails
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:32:52 -0500
From: Mark Reynolds marey...@redhat.com
Reply-To: 389 Directory server developer discussion.
389-de
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/211/0001-Ticket-211-dnaNextValue-gets-incremented-even-if-the.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 02/22/2012 11:21 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 02/16/2012 10:23 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Revised fix based on Rich's comments
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/111
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/111/0001-Ticket-111-ability-to-control-behavior-of-modifyTime.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/17
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17/0001-Ticket-17-Replication-optimizations.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
and if they are
not found in the templates just failover to the hardcoded values?
It will save some time on the script maintenance when the default
values are changed and/or added in the templates.
@+
2012/2/6 Mark Reynolds marey...@redhat.com mailto:marey...@redhat.com
Hi All
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17/0001-Ticket-17-replication-optimizations.patch
Found a few more minor optimizations.
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sorry had the wrong link to the patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17/0001-Ticket-17-new-replication-optimizations.patch
On 02/07/2012 03:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/17/0001
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/129
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/129/0001-Ticket-129-Should-only-update-modifyTimestamp-modifi.patch
This issue was previously fixed, I just expanded the fix a little.
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
if the the first two emails will actually go through.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Reynolds marey...@redhat.com
To: 389 Directory server developer discussion.
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 4:23:52 PM
Subject: [389-devel] please review ticket #129
I had a typo in part of the fix, but...
After looking at ticket #111, I think maybe we should add this flag to
memberOf, referint, and maybe some other plugins.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Mark
PS - having email issues again, so this is a duplicate
On 02/07/2012 04:28 PM, Mark Reynolds
Actually after looking at ticket #111, I think maybe we should add this
flag to memberOf, referint, and maybe some other plugins.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Mark
On 02/07/2012 04:23 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/129
https://fedorahosted.org/389
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175/0001-Ticket-175-logconv.pl-improvements.patch
There might be another duplicate email coming through. Having mail server
issues(again)...
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/175/0001-Ticket-175-logconv.pl-improvements.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi All,
This was a side project of mine for some time, and I just ported it to
DS 389. It basically parses the dse.ldif into a readable format. It
groups all the backend info together. So each backend lists its own
indexes, config, replication info, etc. It checks for non default
config
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/55
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/55/0001-Ticket-55-Limit-of-1024-characters-for-nsMatchingRul.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 02/01/2012 01:56 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 02/01/2012 04:28 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/01/2012 02:16 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Everyone,
There is an issue with the PAM plugin, that when it performs a
successful bind we actually return error 1 to plugins_call_func(),
which essentially causes the abort of the all plugin
Hi Everyone,
There is an issue with the PAM plugin, that when it performs a
successful bind we actually return error 1 to plugins_call_func(), which
essentially causes the abort of the all plugin processing: the rest of
pre-op, the backend call, and all of post-op. PAM has completed the
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/39
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/39/0001-Ticket-39-Account-Policy-Plugin-does-not-work-for-si.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
This fix is now correctly tested.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/55
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/55/0001-Ticket-55-Limit-of-1024-characters-for-nsMatchingRul.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/38
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/38/0001-Ticket-38-nisDomain-schema-is-incorrect.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/6
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/6/0001-Ticket-6-protocol-error-when-doing-a-proxied-auth.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/71
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/71/0001-Ticket-71-Unable-to-delete-managed-entry-config.patch
Thanks in advance,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
901 - 936 of 936 matches
Mail list logo
