Re: Looking for xorg-x11-* package co-maintainers

2014-10-22 Thread Matthieu Gautier
Le 22/10/2014 11:25, Hans de Goede a écrit : Hi All, As you probably know the graphics team always has more work to do then we've manpower. As the person taking care of various old xor-x11 apps / utilities and utility libraries I'm looking for co-maintainers to help with maintaining

New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

2012-11-06 Thread Matthieu Gautier
to maintain doesn't explode. - We can have versions more rough, simplifying dev and still allowing real user feedback. - External editors could base their products on stable versions and skip preview ones. What do you think about this ? Regards, Matthieu Gautier. -- devel mailing list devel

Re: New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

2012-11-06 Thread Matthieu Gautier
Le 06/11/2012 19:48, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : Hello All. 2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org: For example, if we start from Fedora20 at beginning of 2014: - Fedora20(jan 2014) is a stable release. (Fedora18 eol, actual way of doing) - Fedora21Preview(jul 2014

Re: New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

2012-11-06 Thread Matthieu Gautier
Le 06/11/2012 20:05, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : 2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier mgaut...@fedoraproject.org: So you not a maintainer but you still suggesting that we, maintainers, should do 2 times more job by supporting several simultaneous Fedora versions instead of 3 right now for more than two

Re: New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

2012-11-06 Thread Matthieu Gautier
Le 06/11/2012 20:19, Mark Bidewell a écrit : oddly this looks a lot like the Ubuntu release cycle if you replace stable with LTS Ubuntu LTS in about 5 years lifetime. Other releases have a lifetime of 18mo. For now, there is 5 maintained ubuntu versions at the same time (the older is from 2008)