no time to fix, you will do "selinux=0
> dnssec=0"
Whoops.
Why "selinux=0"?
Do you think it would be better to tell people to set "enforcing=0" and
collect AVCs with a report instead of saying "selinux=0"?
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedorapro
as my next step.
Thx.
>
> Cheers!
>
> --alec
>
> [3] https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/issues/38
>
>
>
>
--
Miroslav Grepl
Senior Software Engineer, SELinux Solutions
Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
this support it is a completely uncontrolled IPC
mechanism.
Also some mails about the kdbus development plans and timing would
be helpful.
Thanks.
Mirek
Thanks a lot to everybody who already tested this!
Please test the new version, any feedback much appreciated!
Lennart
--
Miroslav Grepl
On 08/06/2015 01:47 PM, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
On 07/31/2015 08:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 30.07.15 19:57, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our
--
Miroslav Grepl
Senior Software Engineer, SELinux Solutions
Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
not?
Does this require changes in systemd? Does this require changes
anywhere in the core OS, outside of selinux' own userspace?
And so on...
Lennart
--
Miroslav Grepl
Senior Software Engineer, SELinux Solutions
Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
policy.
For example, we should do a better job for bugs like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098446
I will attach an upstream discussion related to this topic.
And of course we want to get real results/numbers once it is a part of
rawhide by default.
--
Miroslav Grepl
Senior
On 01/20/2014 06:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 12:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:10:29PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A simple yum -y update ; reboot ; Oh, everything seems to work has not
been enough this time. And it was an update with a
