rhel 8 beta mock configs and EOLed mock configs

Hi, I just released [1] new mock-core-config package which include new rhelbeta-8-* configs. This will allows you to build packages on top of RHEL 8 Beta. This is temporary config. I put them there so you can experiment with your builds and prepare for EPEL 8 once it will be available. This config

`best=1` in new Mock

Hi, I just released new version of Mock. And I want to quote one important change from the release notes so everyone is aware of it: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.3.3 All chroot (but rawhide) configs now contains best=1. This way DNF will always try to insta

15 thousands python3-* packages for Fedora

Hi, I just finished packaging of 15 634 python3-* packages for Fedora. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/copr/PyPI3/ You can click on Builds and Monitoring tab. But be aware that those pages are HUGE (40MB) and they are loading and rendering several minutes. Tab "Packages" is timeouting

Copr ppc builds are stopped temporary

We have temporary problems with ppc builders so I stopped ppc builds for now. This does not affect i386 and x86_64 queue. I anticipate that tomorrow I may start it again. Mirek Suchy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: Copr cannot download SRPM - no space on device

Dne 19.4.2016 v 13:57 Robert Mayr napsal(a): > Err...ok, I saw there is a limit of 1GB, so I cleaned up the repo a bit > and it's running now. > Sorry for the noise. Nope, there was really full storage. I cleaned it up, so that is reason why subsequent build passed. Mirek -- devel mailing list de

SLA of Copr and changes in future

We are discussing in Fedora Infrastructure about level of SLA of some services. And mainly because of Copr. There are some other services e.g. Jenkins, Taiga. However Copr is probably most popular. Copr service was from begging meant as somehow beta version and did not pass all the requirements Fed

copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org is no more

copr.fedoraproject.org or copr.fedorainfracloud.org The second one is preferred for now. Miroslav Suchy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2016-02-11 08:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2016-02-11 08:00 UTC, which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-02-11 08:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We need to reprovision Copr servers.

Copr GPG keys

Hi, I just released new version of distribution-gpg-keys package: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1a7ed2ffe8 It now includes GPG keys of all Copr projects. Thanks to clime for writing the script which retrieve all those keys. I plan to upgrade those data regularly. Although I

Re: COPR: Fedora 21 is still available as chroot

Dne 23.1.2016 v 13:03 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > Looks like a bug in COPR. Miro? > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016, 12:33 PM Heiko Adams > wrote: > > FYI: Fedora 21 is still available as chroot on COPR. https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel%40lists.fedor

Re: Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2016-01-19 20:00 UTC

Dne 18.1.2016 v 15:28 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > > Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2016-01-19 20:00 UTC > > There will be an outage starting at 2016-01-19 20:00 UTC, which will last > approximately 1 hours. > > During the outage backend will stop processing new task and they will be > queued i

Re: COPR repo in mock?

Dne 19.1.2016 v 06:51 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich napsal(a): > Like any others. Provide information about repo to /etc/mock/YOURCONFIG.cfg > In most cases in would be: /etc/mock/default.cfg > > You could find details for your particular copr repo in file with > corresponding name in /etc/yum.repos.d dir

COPR infrastructure issues caused build failures

Hi, Throughout the day of November 24th, 2015 there have been multiple build failures in COPR because of problems with the COPR infrastructure. If your build failed with only a mockchain.log.gz file which contains the following line: "Failed to obtain srpm from dist-git", or something alike that,

New package distribution-gpg-keys

Hi, I created new project distribution-gpg-keys: https://github.com/xsuchy/distribution-gpg-keys There are various GPG keys used to sign RPM packages. Right now: * centos * epel * fedora * redhat * rpmfusion In future I will try to add all Copr gpg keys. If you find it useful too, yo

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

Dne 14.9.2015 v 23:10 Brendan Conoboy napsal(a): >> /Then/ we could start thinking about /truly minimal/ concepts, >> perhaps “container minimal” = “the minimal set needed to start and >> run an executable dependent on Fedora ABI” (e.g. kernel version >> requirement +glibc+locale data+Python 3 int

New version of Copr (includes dist-git)

It is my pleasure to announce that we just upgraded https://copr.fedoraproject.org It includes several major improvements: * UI converted to PatternFly [1]. Most visible change is that tables (e.g. list of builds) can be sorted using any column and you can filter visible rows using any value.

New architecture in Copr: PPC64LE

Hi, I just enabled new architecture in Copr - PowerPC 64 LE (little endian). There are those chroots available: * fedora-21-ppc64le * fedora-22-ppc64le * fedora-rawhide-ppc64le This happened as co-operation of Red Hat, Brno University of Technology and IBM. I would like to thanks D, Horak and

Failing rawhide builds in Copr

I have been approached by some of you, who already found out that rawhide builds in Copr are failing with: DEBUG util.py:388: rpmlib(ScriptletExpansion) <= 4.9.0-1 is needed by glibc-common-2.21.90-5.fc23.x86_64 This is caused by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=156477 Unless t

Mock, Rawhide and DNF

Hi, I just released mock-1.2.7. It have - beside one small bug and new F22 configs - one important change. The rawhide configs have this one line included: config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' which means that Mock will use DNF for building packages for rawhide targets. There are two conse

Copr outage

Hi, we experienced outage of Copr backend from 2015-02-09 20:00 to 2015-02-10 01:00 UTC. I had to re-install backend. All data are preserved and Copr is up and running now. However during this period some builds were processed before all chain was ready. Therefore some packages build in thi

Re: top in Rawhide

On 10/21/2014 03:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in Rawhide? It is in F21 too. Type: tttmmVbz1W and you get original look and feel. For discussion see bug 1153049. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken deps in rawhide (coreutils)

Today I got report that there are failed builds in Copr for rawhide chroots. [1] After investigation I find that coreutils are installed too late, so they are not available to previous postcripts: Installing : crypto-policies-20140905-1.git4649b7d.fc22.noarch

Re: civil discussion on fedora lists

On 10/17/2014 08:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: You can say something like "I'm not sure I understand the point you are making. Particularly, I don't see how __ follows. Can you explain that in more depth?" And conversely, if you feel like your position isn't being listened to, try "I gues

Wallpapers in portrait orientation

Hi, I'm thinking can we ship for Fedora 22 some wallpapers in portrait orientation? We always shipped wallpapers in landscape mode. But I - and quite people around me - have monitors rotated by 90°, which I personally find much better for development. Right now I have cropped wallpapers, and it wo

New Copr release

r-cli' which I just sent to updates-testing. I wish you happy building. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of C

New version of Copr

Hi, I just deployed new version of Copr. Changes: * copr-cli has been build for epel6 (no planned build for el5 due dependency on python-requests) * you should see less internal server errors. Especially when deleting tasks with multiple srpm * All packages produced by Copr now have as vendor "

New release of Copr

Hi, I just deployed new version of Copr to https://copr.fedoraproject.org/ I deployed it mostly to get rig of few tracebacks we get regularly. But there is some enhancements as well: * https is available. Self signed certificate right now. Final certificate is on the way. * no need to enter

Re: Fedora 18 End of Life

On 01/16/2014 09:05 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote: I'm still unsure what it will mean for existing Fedora 18 repository. I you want to discuss it, you are welcome to copr-devel@ mailing list. So in 3 months I had to come with some solution what to do with old repositories. Options which com

Re: Fedora 18 End of Life

On 01/14/2014 10:31 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: As of 14th January 2014, Fedora 18 has reached its end of life for updates and support. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 18. A previous reminder was sent on December 18th [0]. How does this affect Copr? I

New version of Copr

I just deployed new version of Copr at: http://copr.fedoraproject.org It have only one feature: you can now build in epel-7-x86_64! To be precise - the name "epel" is little bit misleading, because it is right now based on RHEL 7 Beta and does not include EPEL repo, because it does not exist

Re: dnf-0.4.11

On 01/12/2014 11:23 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: Well, IMHO the docs are actually quite clear on that 'all' refers to all metadata rather than all repositories. That said, perhaps enough people has been confused by this to make some kind of improvement motivated. Let leave yum as is, but let try to

Re: dnf-0.4.11

On 01/12/2014 08:27 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: "dnf clean all" without "dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing clean all" does exactly*nothing* in case of "updates-testing", the same for YUM simply because folders of non-enabled repos are not relevant for any operation And is this correct behavior? (a

Why authconfig create -ac files

I just wonder why `authconfig` creates: /etc/pam.d/system-auth -> system-auth-ac /etc/pam.d/postlogin -> postlogin-ac /etc/pam.d/password-auth -> password-auth-ac etc. Why those links and why -ac suffix? Why it does not modify original files directly? Is there some story behind? Mirek

COPR - conclusion

Hi, based on your feedback I decided to go with current code and integrate Koji as backend for Copr later. I see three main reasons: * A lot of you disagree with OBS. And no one is really excited from OBS. * I'm the only full time developer of Copr; there is no community around OBS in Fedora

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

On 08/22/2013 06:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Well, I noticed the rebuild was running only some times. I assume when they were there to launch the builds in that batch? Is there any way all the builds could be listed and just fired off and queued all at once? Peter queue honor build requires (Den

Re: F18, koji and IPv6

On 10.8.2012 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Just as a side note, even if this was applied to our koji, there is currently no ipv6 connectivity at the datacenter it's at, so you would still be unable to connect to it with ipv6. ;( You can be in IPv6 only network and connect via IPv6-IPv4 Proxy, which

Re: As we develop SELinux we are adding new labels to homedir content

On 31.5.2012 21:44, Daniel J Walsh wrote: A third option would be to run "restorecon -R -v $HOME" in background in an profile script the first time you login on a new OS Version. This would seem to be the least time consuming, but could be subject to race conditions, you hit the mislabeled file

Re: Fedora 18 Release name voting and Poll for whether to continue naming releases

On 25.4.2012 15:05, Peter Jones wrote: On 04/24/2012 05:14 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: I can keep only 3-5last releases in my poor head. Then just *don't*. F14 is the past. Let it go. Tell it to Mythdora which is based on Fedora Cambridge. Or RaspberryPi remix which is based on Fedora Laughl