commit f463f99b22ca0ba0823f18602fc508d477c226b5
Author: Nathan Kinder
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:39:26 2012 -0800
Corrected upstream source URLs
perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec b/perl-Mozilla
ack.
On 08/27/2012 01:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 03/06/2012 09:30 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ACK
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 03/02/2012 08:41 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 02/27/2012 04:11 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/181
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/181/0001-ticket-181-Allow-PAM-passthru-plug-in-to-have-multip.patch
Here is a revised patch that avoids some unnecessary DN normalization as
well as addresses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744946
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=527335&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack to both.
On 10/10/2011 09:28 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743966
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=526727&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739172
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=523589&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
abase RUV?
> As far as I can tell, the only way to adjust the database RUV is to
> 1) dump data using db2ldif -r
> 2) manually edit the file to remove the obsolete RUV elements
> 3) reload the data using ldif2db
>
> Note that, due to
> /export1/share/ds/ds.git(master)>git s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735114
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=521730&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 08/31/2011 04:45 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Nathan Kinder wrote:
>> Here is a revised patch to address some review comments:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520694&action=edit
> Do we need to integrate these changes into the IPA winsync plugin?
Here is a revised patch to address some review comments:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520694&action=edit
On 08/30/2011 01:31 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722292
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=52068
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722292
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520685&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732541
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519679&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611438
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519321&action=edit
From 820c1c3f018c5fdb8e547740edb58bc1c0a558de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:25:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 611438 - Add Acc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517299&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713209
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511796&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719056
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511339&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 06/27/2011 09:55 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 06/27/2011 09:54 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706258
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=503567&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697961
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=498171&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703304
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497928&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702150
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497173&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497176&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497179&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700948
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495869&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495871&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=496388&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=496
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495832&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698428
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=493636&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693868
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=490067&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691574
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488262&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488270&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488279&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488
A re-run of Coverity uncovered another issue around cov#10709 that was
masked in the first run.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688341
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486862&action=edit
On 03/17/2011 03:11 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> https://bugzilla.red
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689537
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486665&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486849&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486857&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622436
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483026&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680558
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=482147&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678646
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480016&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654990
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479987&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668950
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477527&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477528&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477529&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583652
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477488&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 02/03/2011 08:19 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 12:08 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>> I have built the DS on Solaris 10 and I have updated the source to 1.2.7.5
>> (git).
>> Can You give me the bugid, so that I can compare the source code related to
>> this
ed.
> Thanks,
> Carsten
>
> - Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
> Von: Nathan Kinder
> Datum: Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, 16:40
>>> On 02/02/2011 02:10 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
>>>
>>> We synchronize AD user with the directory server.
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668862
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=476498&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Here's a revised patch that exposes if mozldap or openldap is used by
dirsrv.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=475007&action=edit
On 01/21/2011 11:14 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252249
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252249
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474667&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543633
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474097&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509897
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=473421&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659131
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=472121&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
tart function
Move the registration of your API (the slapi_apib_register() call) to
the test_winsync_plugin_init() function. That should cause the
callbacks to be registered prior to the Replication plug-in checking for
any regisered API.
Regards
Carsten
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: Na
On 12/13/2010 12:45 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
I found the reason: In winsync-plugin.h in the plugin config is defined a
dependenciy for multi-master plugin. This seems to be wrong, because a Winsync
plugin must already be registered when the multi-master plugin starts. I.e. the
dependency sho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588791
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=468061&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658309
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=464324&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656515
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=462466&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Please review these design notes for implementing one way AD sync. In
particular, I'm concerned about the possible inconsistencies that can
arise from directly modifying a synced entry on the DS side. Does using
access control seem sufficient for avoiding these inconsistencies?
If these notes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619633
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=455649&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619623
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=456094&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305131
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=454373&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/reviewboard/r/91/
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544321
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=452770&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631993
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=452403&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625335
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=451735&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630091
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=449474&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630097
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447549&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447566&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630097
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446995&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447038&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447061&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630094
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446084&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446087&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446093&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630093
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446014&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446023&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630096
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442982&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442983&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442988&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=442
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620927
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=439237&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=439237&action=diff
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
>From 9976cb340f9804456c9fb2179807b9c606fb01a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:05:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 594745 - Get rid of dirsrv_lib_t label
The dirsrv_lib_t label used to label the dirsrv libraries is causing
AVCs to occur from prelink.
>From 8137a2e8a917d0ddf0cc3d4826e88f0acfcdcff5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:16:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 594745 - Get rid of dirsrv_lib_t label
The dirsrv_lib_t label used to label the dirsrv libraries is causing
AVCs to occur from prelink.
On 07/20/2010 02:27 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Nathan Kinder wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389-devel mailing list
>> 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fe
>From 56824d9699ad2f471ac4ec30c24c0600735e42f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:18:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix perl URL parsing code to work with OpenLDAP.
When using PerLDAP built against OpenLDAP, the URL parsing works
a bit differently. This pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601433
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=422261&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=422261&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599732
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=419510&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=419510&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=415519&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=415519&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570912
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404068&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404068&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404069&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=40406
On 03/31/2010 10:04 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 03/31/2010 09:52 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
- "Nathan Kinder" wrote:
The admin server CGIs parse the start-slapd scripts to determine the
DS instance names. A recent format change to start-slapd caused this
parsin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434735
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=394796&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=394796&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460209
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=394380&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=394380&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
On 02/09/2010 12:48 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Nathan Kinder wrote:
>
>>
> ack
>
Thanks! Pushed to master.
Counting objects: 9, done.
Delta compression using 2 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done.
Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 663 bytes, done.
Total 5 (
On 01/22/2010 09:46 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536703
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=386207&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=386207&action=edit
Pushed to master. Thanks to Rich for his review!
Counting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536703
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=386207&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=386207&action=edit
>From 4d93699a71acb061c5787d2b8b61a0417ce02808 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder
Date:
On 01/19/2010 01:50 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Noriko Hosoi wrote:
>
>> Allow modrdn to move subtree and rename non-leaf node
>>
>> This patch includes
>> - replacing the entrydn index with the entryrdn index
>> - replacing a full DN in each entry in the DB with an RDN
>>
81 matches
Mail list logo