Re: (re)introducing - fedora-review - tool to help with package reviews

2011-11-21 Thread Nathan O.
Well there may be a chance this tool may eventually become officially adopted by QA after it gets tested and used long enough to consider it safe/stable. On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky < sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote: > Excerpts from "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"'s message of Mon

Re: Heads up: libpng bumped to 1.5.x in rawhide

2011-11-05 Thread Nathan O.
If it is a new version from upstream then the release will be 1 but if you are updating the SPEC file you would increment the release number. On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > This is my first time as a contributor to run into this. > > Do I simply need to increment by relea

Re: yubikey

2011-10-20 Thread Nathan O.
Thanks for the help, I will put this email in Saved so I will have it later. :-) On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Mario Ceresa wrote: > Hello all! > > I'm an happy possessor of a yubikey and I use it both for FAS > authentication and for ssh access. > > The configuration is the following: > > slo

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

2011-10-13 Thread Nathan O.
I think requiring a minium sized password that is pretty long, like maybe 15-20 or larger. The chance of somebody cracking those sized passwords would be smaller. Also I know there was a previous issue about the Yubikey as part of security. In my opinion requiring a 15-20 long password added with a

Re: Taking a two-week holiday

2011-10-13 Thread Nathan O.
Enjoy your two-week vacation :) On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:23 PM, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 21:19 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > just to let you know - I'm taking a two-week holiday starting > > tomorrow, during which time I probably won't have internet access. So,

yubikey

2011-10-11 Thread Nathan O.
Curious to know, I am thinking about getting a Yubikey to use on FAS and other related logins. I seen you must burn the key. I am concidering getting the Yubikey with the Lasspass subscription included. The question is, if I burn the key first then is it still usuable on Lastpass? I am assuming tha

Re: Upstream Release Monitor

2011-10-11 Thread Nathan O.
Thanks, and your welcome On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:07:11PM -0500, Nathan O. wrote: > > Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with > > URM, Till > > Thank you for the report. I dug a little

Re: Upstream Release Monitor

2011-10-11 Thread Nathan O.
Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with URM, Till On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote: > > I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package lis

Re: Upstream Release Monitor

2011-10-11 Thread Nathan O.
11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Nathan O. wrote: > > I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there > and > > currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. > Well > > I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now

Upstream Release Monitor

2011-10-11 Thread Nathan O.
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The problem is that the URM(Upstream release monitoring) keeps opening a ne

Re:

2011-10-10 Thread Nathan O.
Hmm seems like there is either a spammer or an non-spam account's user has got a virus or so. On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:49 PM, nayan kumar wrote: > .Do you want to be a sex-machine? > http://lelunapark.com/com.friend.php?xID=37si9 > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http

License

2011-08-25 Thread Nathan O.
I am looking at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text . It sounds to me that upstream must provide the COPYING file. I am reviewing pipebench at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731219 The issue with the one the upstream author provided contained some

Re: Not able to update

2011-08-23 Thread Nathan O.
file through git. The problem is getting bodhi to accept the package as an update for F16. On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:57 PM, John5342 wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 18:22, Nathan O. wrote: > > I am not able to submit packages as an update through bodhi web interface > > nor

Not able to update

2011-08-23 Thread Nathan O.
I am not able to submit packages as an update through bodhi web interface nor via fedpkg update. I have the package in F15, but I am trying to send it to F16 and both ways give me the error that "newlisp not tagged as an update candidate" Also I get a weird error for clex when I run fedpkg build "

Re: bodhi status

2011-08-22 Thread Nathan O.
Weird, I know I am submitting a f16 update to f16. So not sure why mine isn't going. I tried two different packages of mine and still gives me a problem. Though with one "clex", after I run fedpkg build, after koji finishes, it gives me: BuildError: package clex is blocked for tag f16-updates-can