Hello,
No rush on this I *just* posted it and sadly I don't have a lot of
time to swap reviews. I thought I would point out that I had posted a
review for php-pecl-cairo if anyone is interested in having it in fedora
so they could review it.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
fering the ownership of this package from
me to gnat, will ping him.
Sorry, had a few busy days and didn't for whatever reason think I had
reason to read the retiring packages... I took ownership.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
mal and vim-enhanced will now class in F17 due to the lack
of a separation between /usr and / so /bin/ex == /usr/bin/ex... Just
something to think about for this package it seems.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.14.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
- ajax
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Without getting into the specifics of whether the feature is useful or
not... Part of it could be. If fstab contains a /tmp mountpoint re-write
it to /var/tmp? I doubt that will make people stop talking about this
feature but just a thought.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing
c.rpm),
then have a comment in the .spec file which specifies the invocation of
the script that was used to generate the source tarball.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/12/2012 11:35 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 04/12/2012 11:53 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
So on Friday I used the netinstall to upgrade my baremetal F15 system
to F17. Went well and I'm enjoying F17 so far. However I noticed that
anaconda is um... too quiet?
[...]
very litt
the case of usrmove). Perhaps at the bottom of the screen some more
detailed messages for those that care could be 'hidden' and expanded
with an arrow or something.
Perhaps the level of detail is sufficient and I'm the only one who
wants to know what is happening?
Th
a bother to those who don't want to install Fedora from
the live media would be a win for all use cases I think.
How bout adding/changing the icon for installing? Can we not include
some text in the icon? "Install Fedora" somehow??
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
deve
On 03/04/2012 06:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hey folks,
A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review:
I'm curious what you mean by 'fedora videos review'... could you explain
more?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
On 03/02/2012 02:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 09:34 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 03/02/2012 06:59 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
I believe Fedora 17 has an add user to admin group checkbox when
adding the initial user, not sure if it is checked on or off by default
want my password, or root pw? Some dialogs do
clearly say, some don't.
+1*1
The number of times I wonder... which password do I enter here? Is
astounding.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Hello,
Just curious, when assigning the default applications I can select
other browsers, email clients etc, but only evolution for the calendar.
Is there something lightening doesn't do such that I can't select it as
the calendar app??
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.461
a bug if desired, but
I didn't know if there was a reason for the current setup...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e ownership if they so choose, but the base set of packages is
'maintained'...?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/19/2012 10:00 AM, Arun SAG wrote:
Hi,
I found this interesting http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q1/200 . I am
not able to reproduce this on my laptop. Any one able to reproduce it?
I'm not able to on an up-to-date F15.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
packagedb and I see there
are other co-maintainers with commit rights. Its funny since I think
I've been managing the package as if I were the sole maintainer.
Do I just sit and wait then?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
re-confirm that you have work
to do on it.
My 2cs
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
;t aware of it other than to start apps...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Just a thank you for allowing me to uncheck 'Use LVM'. Much simpler than
custom partitioning but still gets me what I need/wanted to use.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/12/2011 10:44 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Q: How do I generate a new ssh key? How do I use it for just Fedora
> hosts?
>
> A: See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cryptography and use a
> ~/.ssh/config file to match fedoraproject.org hosts for that key.
So just a message to say, thanks for the ins
On 10/12/2011 12:02 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I currently have my yubikey set up to do this (slot 1 is Fedora, slot 2 is
> for yubikey servers).
Hmm that's great. For some reason I thought the slots still used the
same keys...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel m
On 10/11/2011 08:38 PM, Nathan O. wrote:
> Curious to know, I am thinking about getting a Yubikey to use on FAS and
> other related logins. I seen you must burn the key. I am concidering
> getting the Yubikey with the Lasspass subscription included. The
> question is, if I burn the key first then i
ribing, but not the time. I do think that some of the
info in that thread was informative on this problem.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
o think that wheel has been invented already ...
Have you looked at smock? It somehow computes the order a set of rpms
need to be built in...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/07/2011 12:38 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hmmm... wonder if this is somehow related to glibc changing memcpy that
> caused problem in flash and squashfs?
I thought that happened in F14. so I would expect it to have been
discovered already if that was the case?
--
Nathanael d. No
>
> Why this difference?
>
>
Is the 1660 some how different than the 1710 in driver parlance? I have
a samsung ML-1710 that's been happily printing for years on my
continually upgraded Fedora box, without me installing anything in
particular.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875
pcworld.about.net/magazine/1903p198id38601.htm
>
> I think that TPC requires that PSN are enabled, but I can't think of why.
My guess is that it checks for that changing as part of its 'hash' if it
changes we know something moved... maybe we're no longer on original
hard
nss
> Build Tag Built by
>
>
> nss-3.12.10-5.fc16dist-f16 mschwendt
>
>
perhaps bodhi build override feature go amok
ate
usually means it got tagged as an update but hasn't made it to the repos
yet I think?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
VPN'd access so secured via
encryption and routing/firewall rules.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/14/2011 01:55 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet
> wrote:
>
>
>> Its worked super well for me (though less well with GNOME3's effects
>> etc)... Can you point me to what you mean by the usual info into
>> xorg.
On 06/14/2011 12:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:27:33AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>> On 06/14/2011 07:31 AM, seth vidal wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>> I've installed XFCE. I
On 06/14/2011 11:24 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 12:27 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>> On 06/14/2011 07:31 AM, seth vidal wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>> I've installed XFCE. It was easy to instal
enhance,imo,
> its operation.
Does it have anything like vino where you can share your current running
desktop via VNC? like in Gnome, that's probably my biggest check against
it as I have to often vnc to a remote users session to show them
something...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.
use it. The one trial with whatever
Fedora uses was unsatisfactory so I haven't switched. Also I can't
remember if the virtual system fedora provided could host windows??
Maybe I'm confusing Xen with whatever is in use now. Like I said I made
the switch and haven't seen much
On 06/03/2011 05:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version.
Just curious, why don't you require the version that doesn't require the
patch?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
ting for it to do something, and started to chat to people on
IRC, midway through it all of a sudden continued on. Have you waited
that long?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ided upstream with the patches but I'm not sure if they
were applied or not. Either way not sure if it will solve your problem.
If it does and you need/want the threaded patches let me know.
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
r it isn't the same environment as my live servers. So I test
locally, push to updates-testing and consume it on my production
machines. If good, then I usually add karma. I think its fairly rare for
me, and I can only think of one package where I do that...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.8
,2,3}, bc{1,2}, rc1 ?
>
> It does mean the name will change at each stage, but it should be more
> descriptive as to what stage we're in.
>
> Thoughts?
I like this as well. Seems clear, and then when the candidate
'graduates' it just becomes 'Alpha', &
On 04/04/2011 07:58 AM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
> * xournal
I use this so I've applied for "co-maintainership"...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
pdates.
So I've built my dependent package for dist-f15-mysql as well. Do I need
to do anything else on this? Will the update be pushed by someone else??
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
nt on the bug which will add you to the CC and then
when a build is made it will add a comment to that bug informing you of
a new build to test. Then you can upgrade to the test build and provide
karma for it via bodhi. (there will be links in the comments in bugzilla
when the build is mad
On 03/22/2011 03:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>> So I just got a broken dep mail. I don't mind rebuilding my package
>> however I'm wondering if I shouldn't just wait till you do a mass
>> rebuild of all dependent packages?? Or are you
On 03/22/2011 03:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Nathanael D. Noblet" writes:
>> On 03/22/2011 09:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> OK, I built mysql 5.5.10 in F-15, but I'm not too clear on the process
>>> for getting dependent packages rebuilt in that branch. Any
#x27;t just wait till you do a mass
rebuild of all dependent packages?? Or are you doing that? Or do I need
to wait for the rel-eng ticket so that your build is in the buildroots?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
etc. Ultimately the
initscript change was rejected as F15 is going to systemd making it
somewhat moot. Though I haven't looked at how systemd handles encrypted
partitions
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
administrator!"
In addition to the above... many people (in the windows world) are being
taught to setup their own 'Admin' user to do the installation /
management stuff so that virus' can't get additional rights etc... They
could transfer that same assumption...
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/03/2011 12:42 PM, Will Woods wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:55 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
>> expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
>
> One-line reproducer:
>
> case x"" in x) echo matches x;; x?) echo
On 03/03/2011 10:18 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 11:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
>> expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On 03/02/2011 11:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I'd say, report this as a bug and see where it leads. It's certainly not
> expected behaviour even if it is intentional.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681940
as well I submitted to bash upstream with bashbug which submits to a
ma
On 03/02/2011 04:23 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 04:03 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>> Hello while trying to build a package of mine on F15 I ran into
>> configure issues. They stem from a change in how bash evaluates case
>> statements. My test script: h
On 03/02/2011 04:03 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Hello while trying to build a package of mine on F15 I ran into
> configure issues. They stem from a change in how bash evaluates case
> statements. My test script: http://fpaste.org/6zuv/
>
> F14:
>
> -Z!!!
> = x
> X1
Hello while trying to build a package of mine on F15 I ran into
configure issues. They stem from a change in how bash evaluates case
statements. My test script: http://fpaste.org/6zuv/
F14:
-Z!!!
= x
X1
X1.1 <--- evaluates to No Match for F15
xyes2
xyes3
F15:
-Z!!!
= x
X1
No match1.1
On 01/27/2011 04:10 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hoping to be wrong.
>
> Today I was working on my package after a long time,
> I upgraded from version 2.1-320 to 2.1-400.
>
> I didn't "fedpkg new-sources" and only updated
> the spec file to be 2.1-400 (sou
On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
>> years and it is working just fine).
>> tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it is
>> *not* a dumping
On 01/09/2011 05:52 PM, bradb...@seanet.com wrote:
> I am trying to update the cppad package using a new version of the
> upstream source following the instructions on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo
>
> I used the command
> fedpkg new-sources cppad-20110101.
On 01/07/2011 11:56 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> What is the process for taking over packages that haven't been
> maintained in a long time?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I think that is the procedure.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ld they be,
if so where do they go etc... are there any guidelines for this?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 12/01/2010 04:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:53 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>> On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
>>> also have s
On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't really see any reason why *everyone* who's a packager shouldn't
> also have signed up to be a proven tester by now. I'd like to ask if
> anyone has a perception that it's a hard process to get involved in, or
> if they got the impression that
Hello,
My aunt has F13 installed.. I got the following from her. Is this a
known bug ?? I can't make heads or tails of the error message or what to
tell her to do to resolve it.
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
perl-libs = 4:5.10.1-112.fc13 is needed by perl-4:5.10.1-112.fc13.i686
per
On 11/24/2010 08:00 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 23.11.10 16:56, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote:
>
>>> Imho there should be a packaging guideline to make it clear what needs
>>> to be done in which cases. E.g. when to %ghost files and when not.
&
On 11/23/2010 03:02 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:48:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> I hereby want to let everybody know that in the next days I will turn
>> on
>> /var/run and /var/lock on tmpfs on Rawhide/F15. This is in accordance
>> with the following accepted F15
Just a followup thought... I wonder if abrt could be made smarter /
changed to allow for a preference setting to report on updates-testing
or all updates... I know awhile back I made suggestions on what it would
take in my mind to increase user testing [1]. I see abrt as another way
to help increas
On 11/03/2010 11:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:58 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 11/3/2010 7:02 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>> Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
>>> that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
On 10/26/2010 04:07 AM, nodata wrote:
> Imagine that you want to login to the computer, your username is oiang.
> I want to login too. My username is nodata. Now, I can only login to my
> account and look at my files because only I know my password. You can
> only login to your account because only
om a user session that's one thing and can
easily make it user only accessible with a checkbox I guess. I'm
wondering though, when you plug in a USB thumbdrive... don't all users
have access? What's the difference here? Are we talking about system
wide mounts like mine where
On 10/25/2010 04:40 PM, nodata wrote:
>> Wouldn't they be restricted based on the contents of the encrypted volume?
>
> Yes. Once the volume is mounted it will be treated with normal UNIX
> permissions. So you would have to create a sub-directory on the volume
> where the permissions were strict a
On 10/25/2010 04:28 PM, nodata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes.
>
> The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase
> in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know the
> passphrase, you get to mount the volu
h the /sbin/grub and broken pipe. However
grub.conf has the upgrade to F14 in it. Something to be concerned with?
Seems benign but wondering about why its there. Worth a bug report?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
s moved
to .cert
Thoughts?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638691
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES
> encryption key for disk encryption. I'd prefer the disk crypto key to
> not be on the disk at all, protected by just a passphrase. It would be
> nice to have it on a yubikey instead
One more success.
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon 2100
With AMD 64 X2 CPU
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 08/13/2010 12:20 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Ven 13 août 2010 16:01, Nathanael D. Noblet a écrit :
>
>> There was however a kernel issue from dmesg, should this be filed?
>>
>> ===
>> [ INFO: suspici
Just an idea, without _fully_ understanding the infrastructure, man
power etc ramifications.
Since the move to git, would it not be easier to allow features to
branch rawhide, get their individual bits together (syncing with 'trunk'
periodically)... Then like the kernel does, merge back the wor
On 08/13/2010 09:08 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> It would hurt all sides - it would hurt Fedora, the new distribution, our
>> work in Red Hat, users and so on. And I don't understand why we can't work
>> under one roof - to make Fedora the best OS. Maybe more autonomy for SIG
So with RC4. I have one success and one failure.
Works: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV730
PRO [Radeon HD 4650]
Fails: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV730XT
[Radeon HD 4670]
I've also got one more to test against later today
01:05.0 VGA comp
On 08/12/2010 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
> status is unclear:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> Two reporters in the bug - John Reiser and Mike Chambers - and one
> reporter from the list - Rui
Hello,
I recently acquired a Toshiba L655 laptop, fairly new stuff (both
network card drivers have yet to be merged into the mainline kernel). I
had issues getting Fedora installed, it had massive kernel panics
related to ACPI, but installed with acpi=off. Doing so removed some
advanced features
On 08/06/2010 11:32 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with an IBM point-of-sale system with an Intel 82Q35
> graphics chipset that does not work in RHEL6/F13, but that does work
> fine on SLED 11 !!! That system has a 15" display attached and also
> a VGA port for a second display (to
On 08/02/2010 02:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:17:43 -0600, Nathanael wrote:
>
>> On 08/02/2010 09:32 AM, Branched Report wrote:
>>> Compose started at Mon Aug 2 13:15:11 UTC 2010
>>>
>>> Broken deps for x86_64
>>> -
On 08/02/2010 09:32 AM, Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Mon Aug 2 13:15:11 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> barry-0.17-0.1.20100329git.fc14.x86_64 requires
> libboost_serialization.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
Barry is my
On 05/31/2010 12:03 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Looking at the build logs
>
> In file included from BackupWindow.cc:22:
> BackupWindow.h:22:19: error: gtkmm.h: No such file or directory
> BackupWindow.h:23:24: error: libglademm.h: No such file or directory
>
> It see
On 05/31/2010 11:44 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for i386
> using rawhide from 2010-05-27
>
> This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The
> builders all have Fedora 13 installed.
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRe
On 05/26/2010 06:57 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Ola Thoresen [26/05/2010 14:39] :
>>
>> Would it not be more fruitful to discuss _why_ you (we?) need to edit
>> the initscripts? Describe what functionality is missing or wrong in the
>> default ones?
>
> Editing environnement variables and indic
On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> And so what ?
>
> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/03/2010 05:24 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> You mean the system would download updates while I'm working but I would have
> to wait while it installs them? That's of course a little better than waiting
> while it downloads them too, but in my experience the installation phase
> usually takes lon
On 03/02/2010 06:06 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 01:34 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
>>> Kevin Kofler wrote:
Even bugfix releases of KDE require a session restart to fully work.
>>>
>>> I consider that a serious design flaw in KDE and a strong argument
On 01/14/2010 02:09 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 14.01.10 14:06, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote:
>
>>>> When I advance to the next song in rhythmbox I get odd sound behaviour,
>>>> *after* I've received mail, *if* thunderbird is configu
On 01/15/2010 11:33 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 05:41 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>> This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
>>> Something wrong?
>>> abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
>>>
>>
>> What is it you're tryi
On 01/14/2010 02:09 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 14.01.10 14:06, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote:
>
>>>> When I advance to the next song in rhythmbox I get odd sound behaviour,
>>>> *after* I've received mail, *if* thunderbird is configu
On 01/14/2010 02:02 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 14.01.10 13:58, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote:
>
>>> You can fix this issue by disabling flat-volumes by setting
>>> flat-volumes=no in daemon.conf. Ideally however those drivers should
>>&
On 01/14/2010 01:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 07.01.10 10:42, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>First off, not trying to bash or otherwise start a war about pulseaudio.
>>
>>Just checking if anyone else is ex
101 - 195 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
