On 05/23/2017 11:42 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 22.05.17 19:36, Nikolai Kondrashov (nikolai.kondras...@redhat.com)
wrote:
I'm talking about logins on console now, so I assume the service in question,
technically, is systemd-logind. However, I found out that it's working OK
On 05/22/2017 04:46 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 22.05.17 14:11, Nikolai Kondrashov (nikolai.kondras...@redhat.com)
wrote:
I'm trying to solve a problem of supplying locale settings to non-shell
programs acting as login shells in Fedora and RHEL, as described
below.
Which services
systemd can help here?
Thank you.
Nick
On 04/04/2017 06:06 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Hi everyone,
At the moment users logging into Fedora on a text terminal (console, SSH,
etc.) get their locale environment variables (LANG, LC_ALL, etc.) set up by
the shell they use. I.e. the shell
On 05/22/2017 01:30 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:46 +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Do you think the below could be done, from PoV of PAM/authconfig?
I do not have any problem with this if the locale.conf file is really
in format that is accepted by pam_env.
It seems
Hi Tomas,
Do you think the below could be done, from PoV of PAM/authconfig?
On 04/04/2017 06:06 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
At the moment users logging into Fedora on a text terminal (console, SSH,
etc.) get their locale environment variables (LANG, LC_ALL, etc.) set up by
the shell they use
Hi everyone,
At the moment users logging into Fedora on a text terminal (console, SSH,
etc.) get their locale environment variables (LANG, LC_ALL, etc.) set up by
the shell they use. I.e. the shell ultimately sources the /etc/locale.conf
file. This works fine in most cases.
However, if the user
On 03/29/2017 04:52 PM, Tomasz Kloczko wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 12:26 +0000, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> I would say using env in the shebang line is useful. Particularly for
>> portability. As a developer, I wouldn't like removing it from my programs.
>
> Portab
On 03/29/2017 04:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 02:26 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> I would say using env in the shebang line is useful. Particularly for
>> portability. As a developer, I wouldn't like removing it from my programs.
>
> FPC repeated discusse
I would say using env in the shebang line is useful. Particularly for
portability. As a developer, I wouldn't like removing it from my programs.
Moreover, if your PATH is compromised, you're most likely screwed.
I understand, that env use in scripts makes is inconvenient in some cases,
but I
