golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter seems to be unmaintained at this point.
There are a few open CVEs that have been corrected upstream in the last year
but not made it down to the fedora package.
In Feb I opened a maintainer check ticket :
Somehow I missed the orphaning of perl-Parse-EDID.
Anyway, I'd like to take over maintenance of this package as other packages I
maintain are dependent on it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Thanks for providing this information!
I'll confess my primary worry/complaint about Modularity/AppStream in RHEL8 is
one of lifecycle.
The default Stream in RHEL8 does not have the full 10 year lifecycle[1] present
in RHEL7. Folks doing a standard 'yum install ' get the default stream,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 9:48 AM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Daniel Mach writes:
>
> > Dne 12. 03. 20 v 19:26 Pat Riehecky napsal(a):
> >
> >> I realize I'm thinking about the Pie in the Sky, but:
> >>
> >> Would it be possible for 'microdnf' to b
I realize I'm thinking about the Pie in the Sky, but:
Would it be possible for 'microdnf' to become the base for 'dnf' so
that extra 'dnf' functionality is added via some kind of
modules/plugins/etc behaviour? Perhaps "somehow" it could (for
example) find out "oh I've got python, lets load those
_does not_ have to be part of a module for this
to work.)
What do you think?
I like it, but perhaps it is worth adding a note that EPEL8 packages
must not include an 'Obsoletes' that targets packages shipped in RHEL
itself.
--
Pat Riehecky
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
point.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.fedoraproject.org_archives_list_epel-2Ddevel-40lists.fedoraproject.org=DwIGaQ=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE=JREsJ1UsNfneo0dfASSv7aXJ636AuoNqrvjWCNarRXM=g0LPIxaoeIpqaiUcgHeXbgEP_xnRNTSRu1K5mzN3hHE=
--
Pat Riehecky
Fermi Nationa
On 1/30/20 9:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 30. 01. 20 16:44, Pat Riehecky wrote:
While I lack good answers, perhaps another question. What a the
thoughts on using python `.pth` files for python modules that work in
multiple interpreters?
In theory this would permit bit for bit identical
that work in
multiple interpreters?
In theory this would permit bit for bit identical libraries in multiple
interpreters at once?
Pat
--
Pat Riehecky
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org
___
epel-devel mailing li
-40lists.fedoraproject.org=DwIGaQ=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA=OAMtP0DWou0nlXG7Kmxo2enjXJfwb1DXS9fwcaESuTE=LjoA7RuRzR3C0cLyJ5t2BpQMDDK7LYiZUm7DpcdpeO0=ACx3GduD32EdnaHWij5g0VeFnaw09J0G5EBkAG8Cl-g=
--
Pat Riehecky
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
www.fnal.gov
www.scientificlinux.org
app. If every perl module becomes a Modularity Module,
then 'dnf module list' is going to have a nearly endless list of perl
packages, but if modules are only available for one stream, folks are
going to find cpan a bit more friendly.
Pat
--
Pat Riehecky
Fermi National Accelerator Lab
to take it over. I asked the
maintainers to retire it because they were closing things wontfix.
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 10:07, Pat Riehecky <mailto:riehe...@fnal.gov>> wrote:
These days cinnamon is my preferred desktop. Thanks for the patch!
Any chance for an epel-testin
=cfb06e44527f6d4fd6be1ef138ee29eb277e62fd
El 6/11/18 a las 17:27, Pablo Sebastián Greco escribió:
Here's the removal patch. It would be good to know if the reason is
technical or personal, to see if we can come up with a solution.
Pablo.
El 6/11/18 a las 17:00, Pat Riehecky escribió:
Looks like cinnamon needs some work
Looks like cinnamon needs some work for RHEL 7.6 and someone to do it...
Pat
Forwarded Message
Subject:[Bug 1647181] Cinnamon missing deps in 7.6
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:57:06 +
From: bugzi...@redhat.com
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed
ed
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Pat Riehecky
Fermi
understanding, EPEL7 should work in both
OSes.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
Fred
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Pat Riehecky
Fermi National
On 08/24/2016 04:58 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Orion Poplawski > wrote:
I have no idea if there is any interest in this or not. I managed
to get the
EPEL7 python34 package to build on EL6 with a few
On 01/12/2016 11:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/12/2016 08:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
'LibRaw-0.17.1-3.el7.x86_64 (epel-testing)' and
'LibRaw-0.14.8-5.el7.20120830git98d925.x86_64 (@base/$releasever)' are
conflicting
I think there is some confusion around this. It seems that it may
-devel
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
19 matches
Mail list logo